Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Spgb Circular 1973 03 Camden Economic Org

Spgb Circular 1973 03 Camden Economic Org

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2 |Likes:
Published by Wirral Socialists
Spgb Circular 1973 03 Camden Economic Org
Spgb Circular 1973 03 Camden Economic Org

More info:

Published by: Wirral Socialists on May 01, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





March, 1973Camden Branch Statement on Conference Resolution on “The Socialist Party and EconomicOrganisation”.(1)It is not in dispute that the Party always supported the class conscious organisation of the workerson both the Political and the Economic field.Discussion took place in the Party about the application of this to the existing organisations of theworkers in view of the fact that a trade union which limited its membership to socialists would not be able to function effectively while socialists are only a small minority of the workers.Haringey Branch Conference Resolution refers to articles in the SS in July, 1915, November, 1937and May, 1966. The article in July, 1915 was the second part of an article by A.B. Jacomb of whichthe first part appeared in April, 1915- If all four articles are considered it will be seen that all threewriters opposed the SLP conception of industrial unions, which were not based on class-consciousworkers. All three writers emphasised that before Socialism can be established the working classwill be overwhelmingly socialist and that this will show itself both in the Socialist politicalorganisation and in the Economic organisation; with Eaowever the difference that Jacomb wrote of "Economic Organisation"5 Reynolds (SS November 1937) wrote of the "existing unions" andMelvin (May 1966) wrote of "organisations".All three writers opposed, as Reynolds put it, the SLP concept of industrial unions as "the basis of the economic organisation for the establishment of Socialism, or to use their own phrase 'Industrialunionism is the embryo, the un-developed form of future society'". (Reynolds, November 1937) .All three writers dealt with the need for socialists to be prepared for the running of industry at the point at which political control of the machinery of government has just been achieved. ("At thevery moment that the worker§ have gained control of the State machine". Reynolds November,1937; "The Running of industry in the newborn Socialist Society'' Melvin May, I966)Jacomb and Reynolds explicitly stated the Party case that control under Socialism will be social notindustrial. (Melvin May 1966 opposed the SLP concept that "these unions would then form theframework of socialist society and become its permanent administration".)(2) Article in SS May 1972In opposition to the Party case and in contradiction to all three writers the May 1972 SS containedthe statement that "Socialism can only be established by a conscious participating working classorganised not only politically to capture and destroy the State machine but also, outside Parliamentready to take over and run industry and society generally", (our italics)The EC issued a statement repudiating the statement in the SS. (EC 15 August 1972) pointing outthat our Declaration of Principles holds that socialist society will be based on"common ownership and democratic control by and inthe interest of the whole community"; not on "independent, sectional decisions in each industry bythe people who happen to work in it".Haringey Branch had written to the EC asking why the EC objected to the statement in the May SS.Haringey conference resolution does not specify the function of the economic organisationand it would seem that they have in mind the kind of economic organisation referred to in the MaySS, 1972 "to take over and run industry and society generally".(3) Jacomb's ArticleOf the three writers only Jacomb dealt in detail with the place of the economic organisation in theestablishment of Socialism.In the first part of his article (SS April 1915) Jacomb wrote:-"The armed forces of the State are to becontrolled, through the conquest of the machinery of government, and used for the overthrow of thecapitalist system. So far from true is it that the "only conceivable source of power" with which theworkers can back up the ballot is that to be found in economic organisation, that it is the economicorganisation which will need the backing of the organised military force - controlled by the politically triumphant proletariat - to enable it to perform its penultimate function, the placing of the

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->