US - Joint Strike Fighter Selected Acquisition Report (F-35 - SAR - 31 DEC 2011)

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)
RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-198
F-35
As of December 31, 2011
Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR)
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
December 31, 2011 SAR
Table of Contents
Program Information Responsible Office References Mission and Description Executive Summary Threshold Breaches Schedule Performance Track To Budget Cost and Funding Low Rate Initial Production Nuclear Cost Foreign Military Sales Unit Cost Cost Variance Contracts Deliveries and Expenditures Operating and Support Cost
3 3 3 4 5 7 8 11 16 20 59 60 60 61 67 74 83 84
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
Program Information
Designation And Nomenclature (Popular Name) F-35 Joint Strike Fighter DoD Component DoD Joint Participants United States Navy (USN); United States Air Force (USAF); Canada; The Netherlands; Italy; Turkey; Australia; United States Marine Corps (USMC); Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA); United Kingdom; Denmark; Norway The F-35 Program is a joint DoD program for which Service Acquisition Executive (SAE) Authority alternates between the Department of the Navy and the Department of the Air Force, and currently resides with the Air Force.
Responsible Office
Responsible Office VADM David Venlet F-35 Lightning II Program Office 200 12th St South Suite 600 Arlington, VA 22202-5402 david.venlet@jsf.mil
Phone Fax DSN Phone DSN Fax
703-601-5504 703-602-7649 329-5504 --
Date Assigned May 1, 2010
References F-35 Aircraft

SAR Baseline (Development Estimate) Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated October 26, 2001 Approved APB Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
F-35 Engine
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate) Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated October 26, 2001 Approved APB Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
Mission and Description

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program will develop and field an affordable, highly common family of nextgeneration strike aircraft for the United States Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and allies. The three variants are the F-35A Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL); F-35B Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (STOVL); and the F-35C Aircraft Carrier suitable Variant (CV). The CTOL will be a stealthy multi-role aircraft, primary air-to-ground for the Air Force to replace the F-16 and A-10 and complement the F-22. The STOVL variant will be a multi-role strike fighter aircraft to replace the AV-8B and F/A-18A/C/D for the Marine Corps, and replace the AV-8 currently employed by the Italian Navy. The CV will provide the Navy a multi-role, stealthy strike fighter aircraft to complement the F/A-18E/F and replace the Sea Harrier and GR 7 for the United Kingdom.
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
Executive Summary
This SAR complies with the statutory requirement to create subprograms (aircraft and engine) for the F-35 program; therefore program costs are no longer reflected in aggregate. Comparisons to previous aggregate SAR cost elements require the addition of both aircraft and engine subprogram cost elements. Additionally, the costs in this SAR are in Base Year (BY) 2012 dollars. The F-35 remains the DoD's largest cooperative acquisition program, with eight International Partners participating with the US under Memorandums of Understanding for System Development and Demonstration (SDD) and Production, Sustainment and Follow-on Development. The F-35 Program has completed over 10 years of SDD and is currently executing Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) 5. In December 2011, the development program restructure was completed and is now being executed in accordance with the new performance measurement baseline. Key activities that supported the restructure include development of a new Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), execution of a Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA), and completion the Integrated Baseline Review (IBR). Under these efforts, the DoD revised flight test rates, established longer software development spans, increased emphasis on systems engineering discipline and processes and established new performance measures. In January 2011, the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) placed the F-35B Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (STOVL) variant on probationary status due to significant, unique technical issues. F-35B testing was decoupled from the other two variants, allowing the program to increase focus on F-35B-specific development issues while testing on the other variants progressed. While all three variants demonstrated improved testing performance in 2011, the F-35B successfully completed more flights and test points than planned in addition to the first successful ship trials. Based on the results to date, the SECDEF determined the F-35B was demonstrating development, test, and production maturity comparable to and not substantially different from the other F-35 variants. As a result, the SECDEF made the decision on January 20, 2012 to remove the F-35B from probationary status. The SDD flight test program has accumulated 2,698 total flight test hours through March 24, 2012. In CY 2011, the flight test program exceeded test point and flight targets for all variants. In CY 2011 aboard the USS WASP, the F35B test program accomplished the first F-35 ship-board operations and the first F-35C ship suitability testing. This testing included Jet Blast Deflector, nominal and steam ingestion catapult tests, and compatibility tests with the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. As of March 24, 2012, the F135 engine development program has completed 2,698 flight hours over 1,681 flights, with a total of 20,315 hours of engine testing encompassing all three variants of F-35 aircraft. The Milestone B (MS B) Recertification Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) was conducted in two parts. The first part, held on January 17, 2012 reviewed the programs progress and issues in development, production, and sustainment. The second session, held on February 21, 2012, focused on 2366b certification and other regulatory/statutory requirements for the MS B DAB. The Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM), which will recertify MS B will be signed in March 2012. Software risk remains one of the top development issues for the program. Block 1B and 2A development/integration challenges are impacting capacity for delivery of Block 2B. The development program restructure built capacity for discovery in Blocks 2 and 3 development. In 2011, the results of independent software assessments highlighted known risk areas and endorsed on-going process improvements. As a result, the program is continuing to develop and refine processes to proactively make decisions on capability development and delivery, and mitigation strategies. The program continues to make positive strides in the production program. The first Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) lot has been completely delivered. As of March 22, 2012, nine production aircraft have been delivered to Eglin Air Force Base. 17 aircraft are on the Fort Worth, TX flight line preparing for delivery. There are also 17 aircraft in assembly build (three LRIP 3 and 14 LRIP 4 aircraft) and 49 aircraft in component assembly. The F135
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
propulsion contractor has delivered 25 production propulsion systems to-date. On April 25, 2011, a notice of termination for convenience was issued by the F-35 Primary Contracting Officer to the General Electric/Rolls Royce Fighter Engine Team, Limited Liability Company on the F136 SDD contract. Sustainment costs continue to be a significant area of focus. The Department is undertaking proactive management of the sustainment effort so that we have a clear understanding of life cycle Operations and Support (O&S) costs. The program is in the midst of a two-year should cost effort on the O&S cost. This effort will continue through 2012. Over the next 12 months, the program will complete an F-35 Business Case Analysis (BCA) and the results from the BCA will assist the Program Executive Officer in refining the current F-35 support strategy. The BCA will also identify the best mix of existing Service/Partner Organic capabilities with that of the Industry team to develop the optimum long term best value F-35 support solution. The Services, working in concert with the program office, will continue to analyze options outside of the program offices purview to reduce operating costs; such as reviewing basing options and the sequencing of those actions, unit level manpower/squadron size and discrete sustainment requirements. In addition, the program has identified a number of Affordability Initiatives to help drive down sustainment costs. The US Services have requested, with the support of the Department, to delay establishing Initial Operational Capability (IOC) dates. The US Services require more definition in the program schedule regarding IOC requirements, to include operational test dates, before targeting a timeline. They are pleased with the progress they have witnessed over the past year, but wish to observe additional results during 2012. The program anticipates the Services will identify their IOC dates in 2013. On February 14, 2012, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) met and made some important decisions regarding the F-35 Key Performance Parameters (KPPs). The impetus for these changes was guidance from the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who chairs the JROC. The VCJCS asked programs to examine portfolios for KPPs that could potentially be modified based on observed performance or changes in concepts of operation with minimal or no impact on the warfighter that could substantially reduce the cost of a program. This effort is in keeping with the JROCs statutory requirement to consider cost, schedule and performance. Agreement was reached to modify the following: a) revise a Ground Rule and Assumption (GR&A) for the F-35A Combat Radius. The GR&As underpinning the KPP were updated to reflect the aircraft optimum airspeed and altitude, values that have been obtained through testing. Once these values were applied to the mission profile, the performance of the aircraft exceeded the original, unchanged KPP value, and b) approved a change to the F-35B Short Takeoff distance KPP from 550ft to 600ft. The STOVL variant (F-35B) 550ft short takeoff KPP was based on a four-ship simultaneous launch concept, formerly planned for use by the AV-8B. This concept is no longer in use. Planned F35B operations (and the way AV-8Bs currently operate) are for a maximum of two aircraft to depart from the ship, and increase the length of useable flight deck. This increased distance facilitated the addition of 50ft to the original, no-longer-relevant 550ft requirement, resulting in significant savings to the taxpayer. Attempting to achieve the original requirement would have required significant resources (e.g. more engine thrust or significant weight reductions), and would have resulted in excessive cost growth. The JROC Memorandum (040-12) that approved these changes was signed on March 16, 2012. Current estimates for all KPP are now within threshold requirements. In December 2011, Japan selected the F-35 as their next generation fighter aircraft. Upon the signing of the Letter of Offer and Acceptance, Japan will become the second F-35 Foreign Military Sales (FMS) customer along with Israel.
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
Threshold Breaches
F-35 Aircraft APB Breaches Schedule Performance Cost RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M Unit Cost PAUC APUC Nunn-McCurdy Breaches Current UCR Baseline PAUC None APUC None Original UCR Baseline PAUC None APUC None
F-35 Engine APB Breaches Schedule Performance Cost RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M Unit Cost PAUC APUC Nunn-McCurdy Breaches Current UCR Baseline PAUC None APUC None Original UCR Baseline PAUC None APUC None
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
Schedule
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
F-35 Aircraft Milestones
SAR Baseline Dev Est NOV 1996 NOV 2010 OCT 2001 APR 2003 OCT 2005 MAY 2006 JAN 2007 JAN 2006 JUL 2006 JAN 2007 MAR 2008 MAY 2010 DEC 2010 N/A N/A APR 2016 N/A APR 2016 DEC 2012 APR 2016 APR 2016
Concept Demonstration Contract Award Milestone B EMD Contract Award Preliminary Design Review Critical Design Review CDR (CTOL&Common) CDR (STOVL&Common) CDR (CV&Common) DAE (IPR 1) 1st Flt CTOL DAE (IPR 2) 1st Flt STOVL 1st Flt CV 1st Production Aircraft Delivered Block 2B Fleet Release Block 3F Fleet Release Completed IOT&E Full Rate Production Decision DAB Milestone C USMC IOC USAF IOC USN IOC
Current APB Development Objective/Threshold NOV 1996 MAY 1997 NOV 2011 MAY 2012 OCT 2001 APR 2002 APR 2003 OCT 2003 OCT 2005 MAY 2006 JAN 2007 JAN 2006 JUL 2006 JAN 2007 MAR 2008 MAY 2010 DEC 2010 MAR 2015 AUG 2017 FEB 2019 APR 2019 APR 2019 TBD TBD TBD APR 2006 NOV 2006 JUL 2007 JUL 2006 JAN 2007 JUL 2007 SEP 2008 NOV 2010 JUN 2011 SEP 2015 FEB 2018 AUG 2019 OCT 2019 OCT 2019 TBD TBD TBD
Current Estimate NOV 1996 OCT 2001 OCT 2001 APR 2003 FEB 2006 FEB 2006 JUN 2007 MAR 2006 DEC 2006 APR 2007 JUN 2008 JUN 2010 MAY 2011 MAR 2015 AUG 2017 FEB 2019 APR 2019 APR 2019 TBD TBD TBD
(Ch-1) (Ch-2) (Ch-2) (Ch-3) (Ch-2) (Ch-4)
Acronyms And Abbreviations APB - Acquisition Program Baseline CDR - Critical Design Review CTOL - Conventional Takeoff and Landing CV - Aircraft Carrier Suitable Variant DAB - Defense Acquisition Board DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development Flt - Flight IOC - Initial Operational Capability IOT&E - Initial Operational Test and Evaluation IPR - Interim Progress Review STOVL - Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing USAF - United States Air Force USMC - United States Marine Corps USN - United States Navy Change Explanations (Ch-1) 1st Production Aircraft Delivered changed from October 2010 to May 2011 as a result of manufacturing
UNCLASSIFIED
F-35
delays. (Ch-2) Schedule event added to reflect March 2012 APB. (Ch-3) Completed IOT&E changed from TBD to FEB 2019 incorporating changes in the program that are reflected in the March 2012 APB. (Ch-4) DAB Milestone C changed from TBD to APR 2019 incorporating changes in the program that are reflected in the March 2012 APB. Memo 1/ Original Milestone B rescinded in June 2010 due to Nunn-McCurdy breach. Milestone B Approval completed March 2012. 2/ IOT&E completion is Program Office estimate based on 2011 program structure, it will be revised as necessary to reflect approved Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) revision 4 data. 3/ Service IOC dates have not been established pending further service assessment. 4/ Full Rate Production Decision will replace the DAB Milestone C. Also, the June 2010 Nunn-McCurdy Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) directs that Full Rate Production will be Milestone C for this program.
F-35 Engine Milestones
SAR Baseline Dev Est N/A
See Note
Current APB Development Objective/Threshold N/A N/A
Current Estimate N/A
Change Explanations None Memo Schedule milestones for the F-35 Engine subprogram (F135 and F136) are captured as part of the system-level schedule milestones reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.
UNCLASSIFIED
10
F-35
Performance
F-35 Aircraft Characteristics
SAR Baseline Dev Est Execute 550 ft STO with 4 JDAM (2 external & 2 internal), 2 AIM-120 (internal), fuel to fly 550nm
STOVL Mission Performance - STO Distance Flat Deck
Combat Radius NM CTOL Variant Combat Radius NM STOVL Variant Combat Radius NM -
690 550 730
Current APB Development Objective/Threshold With four With two 1000# 1000# JDAMs and JDAMs and two internal two internal AIM-120s, AIM-120s, full full expendables, expendables, execute a execute a 600 foot 600 foot (450 UK (450 UK STOVL) STOVL) STO from STO from LHA, LHD, LHA, LHD, and aircraft and aircraft carriers (sea carriers (sea level, tropical level, tropical day, 10 kts day, 10 kts operational operational WOD) and WOD) and with a with a combat combat radius of radius of 550 nm 450 nm (STOVL (STOVL profile). Also profile). Also must must perform perform STOVL STOVL vertical vertical landing with landing with two 1000# two 1000# JDAMs and JDAMs and two internal two internal AIM-120s, AIM-120s, full full expendables, expendables, and fuel to fly and fuel to fly the STOVL the STOVL Recovery Recovery profile. profile. 690 590 550 730 450 600
Demonstrated Current Performance Estimate TBD Execute 544 ft. STO with 2 JDAM (internal), 2 AIM-120 (internal), fuel to fly 450nm
TBD TBD TBD
584 469 615
UNCLASSIFIED
11
F-35
CV Variant Internal Weapons Carriage - CTOL Variant
Sufficient bay volume to load, carry & employ objective Annex A weapons Sufficient bay volume to load, carry & employ objective Annex A weapons Sufficient bay volume to load, carry & employ objective Annex A weapons See Classified Extract Less than or equal to 6 C17 equivalent loads Less than or equal to 4 C17 equivalent loads Less than or equal to 34,000 cu ft, 183 Short Tons 4/day initial surge; 3/day sustained surge; 2/day Wartime Sustained based on ASD of 2.5
N/A
N/A
TBD
Internal Weapons Carriage - STOVL Variant
N/A
N/A
TBD
Internal Weapons Carriage - CV Variant
N/A
N/A
TBD
Radio Frequency (RF) Signature Logistic Footprint CTOL Variant
N/A
N/A
TBD
Sufficient bay volume to load, carry & employ threshold Annex A weapons Sufficient bay volume to load, carry & employ threshold Annex A weapons Sufficient bay volume to load, carry & employ threshold Annex A weapons Classified
N/A
N/A
TBD
Logistic Footprint STOVL Variant
N/A
N/A
TBD
Logistic Footprint -CV Variant
N/A
N/A
TBD
Sortie Generation Rate - CTOL Variant
N/A
N/A
TBD
Less than or equal to 6.67 C-17 equivalent loads Less than or equal to 5.22 C-17 equivalent loads Less than or equal to 29,407 cu ft, 164.4 Short Tons 3.55/day initial surge; 3.30/day sustained surge; 1/day Wartime Sustained based on
UNCLASSIFIED
12
F-35
Sortie Generation Rate - CV Variant
4/day initial surge; 3/day sustained surge; 1/day Wartime Sustained based on ASD of 1.8
N/A
N/A
TBD
Sortie Generation Rate - STOVL Variant
6/day initial surge; 4/day sustained surge; 2/day Wartime Sustained based on ASD of 1.1
N/A
N/A
TBD
Interoperability
100% of all N/A top level IERs
N/A
TBD
Mission Reliability
98% for all variants at ASD's listed in Table 13
N/A
N/A
TBD
CV Recovery Performance, Approach Speed
Max approach speed (Vpa) at RCLW of less than 140 kts
N/A
N/A
TBD
Force Protection - All Variants
N/A
Net Ready (NR) - All
N/A
See Classified Annex in the ORD 100% of all
See Classified Annex in the ORD 100% of
TBD
TBD
ASD of 2.5 3.90/day initial surge; 2.88/day sustained surge; 1/day Wartime Sustained based on ASD of 1.8 6.10/day initial surge; 5.55/day sustained surge; 1/day Wartime sustained based on ASD of 1.1 Less than 100% of critical top level IERs 98.4% for CV, 98.0% for STOVL & 97.1% for CTOL at ASD's listed in Table 13 Max approach speed (Vpa) at RCLW of less than approximately 144.6 kts w/15 kts WOD at RCLW See Classified Annex in the ORD 100% of
UNCLASSIFIED
13
F-35
Variants
top-level OEIEs. N/A See Classified Annex in the ORD See Classified Annex in the ORD 98% 98% 98% Less than or equal to 6 C17 equivalents
critical toplevel OEIEs. See Classified Annex in the ORD See Classified Annex in the ORD 93% 95% 95% TBD
Survivability - All Variants
RF Signature (A component of the Survivability KPP) - All Variants Mission Reliability CTOL Variant Mission Reliability - CV Variant Mission Reliability STOVL Variant Logistics Footprint CTOL Variant
N/A
TBD
N/A N/A N/A N/A
TBD TBD TBD TBD
all toplevel OEIEs. See Classified Annex in the ORD See Classified Annex in the ORD 98% 98% 98% Less than or equal to 6 C-17 equivalents Less than or equal to 34,000 cu ft., 183 ST Less than or equal to 4 C-17 equivalents Less than or equal to 15,000 cu ft, 104 ST 4.0/3.0/2.0 2.5 ASD 4.0/3.0/1.0 1.8 ASD 6.0/4.0/2.0 1.1 ASD Vpa. Maximum approach speed (Vpa) at required carrier landing weight (RCLW) of
Logistics Footprint - CV N/A Variant
Logistics Footprint STOVL Variant
N/A
Logistics Footprint STOVL Variant LClass Sortie Generation Rates - CTOL Variant Sortie Generation Rates - CV Variant Sortie Generation Rates - STOVL Variant (USMC) CV Recovery Performance (Vpa)
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
Less than or equal to 8 C17 equivalent loads Less than or Less than or equal to equal to 34,000 cu ft., 46,000 cu ft., 183 ST 243 ST Less than or Less than or equal to 4 C- equal to 8 C17 17 equivalents equivalent loads Less than or Less than or equal to equal to 15,000 cu ft, 21,000 cu ft, 104 ST 136 ST 4.0/3.0/2.0 3.0/2.0/1.0 2.5 ASD 2.5 ASD 4.0/3.0/1.0 3.0/2.0/1.0 1.8 ASD 1.8 ASD 6.0/4.0/2.0 4.0/3.0/1.0 1.1 ASD 1.1 ASD Vpa. Maximum approach speed (Vpa) at required carrier landing weight (RCLW) of less than
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD TBD TBD
N/A
Vpa. TBD Maximum approach speed (Vpa) at required carrier landing weight (RCLW) of less than
UNCLASSIFIED
14
F-35
140 knots.
145 knots.
less than 140 knots.
Requirements Source: The Joint Strike Fighter Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Change 3, dated August 19, 2008. Objective/Threshold change approved by Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) 040-12 dated March 16, 2012.
Acronyms And Abbreviations ASD - Average Sortie Duration CTOL - Conventional Takeoff and Landing CU FT - Cubic Feet CV - Aircraft Carrier Suitable Variant IER - Information Exchange Requirement JDAM - Joint Direct Attack Munitions KTS - Knots NM - Nautical Miles RCLW - Required Carrier Landing Weight STO - Short Takeoff STOVL - Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing TBD - To be determined Vpa - Max Approach Speed WOD - Wind Over the Deck Change Explanations None F-35 Engine Characteristics
SAR Baseline Dev Est N/A
See Note
Current APB Demonstrated Current Development Performance Estimate Objective/Threshold N/A N/A TBD N/A
Requirements Source: The Joint Strike Fighter Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Change 3, dated August 19, 2008 Objective/Threshold change approved by Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) 040-12 dated March 16, 2012.
Change Explanations None
UNCLASSIFIED
15
F-35
Track To Budget F-35 Aircraft

General Memo F-35 is DoD's largest cooperative development program. In addition to the above DoD funding lines, eight other International Partners are providing funding in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) Phase under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): United Kingdom, Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. All but Turkey and Australia were partners in the prior phase. Associated financial contributions are reflected in the Annual Funding section as Appropriation 9999, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Non-Treasury Funds. RDT&E APPN 1319 BA 04 PE 0603800N RDT&E, Navy CDP APPN 1319 BA 05 Project 2262 APPN 1319 BA 05 Project 2261 Project 3194 Project 9999 PE 0604800M RDT&E, Marine Corps PE 0604800N RDT&E, Navy EMD/JSF RDT&E, Navy EMD/Joint Reprogramming Center RDT&E, Navy EMD/Congressional Adds PE 0603800F RDT&E, Air Force CDP APPN 3600 BA 05 Project 3831 PE 0604800F RDT&E, Air Force EMD/Joint Strike Fighter Quantity of RDT&E Articles PE 0603800E RDT&E, DARPA (DoD) (Sunk) (Air Force) (Navy) (Shared) (Navy) (Shared) (Shared) (Sunk) (Navy) (Sunk)
APPN 3600
BA 04
(Air Force) (Sunk)
APPN 0400
BA 03
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation cost excludes Follow-On Development Funding. Procurement
UNCLASSIFIED
16
F-35
APPN 1506
BA 01 ICN 0147
PE 0204146N JSF (Navy) PE 0204146M JSF (Marine Corps) PE 0204146N Initial Spares (Navy) PE 0204146M Initial Spares (Marine Corps) PE 0207142F Initial Spares (Air Force) PE 0207142F JSF (Air Force) PE 0207142F Mods (Air Force)
(Navy)
APPN 1506
BA 01 ICN 0152
(Navy)
APPN 1506
BA 06 ICN 0605
(Navy) (Shared) (Navy) (Shared) (Air Force) (Shared) (Air Force)
APPN 1506
BA 06 ICN 0605
APPN 3010
BA 06 ICN 000999
APPN 3010
BA 01 ICN ATA000
APPN 3010
BA 05 ICN F03500
(Air Force) (Sunk)
MILCON
APPN 1205
BA 01
PE 0212576N
(Navy) (Sunk) (Navy)
Project N1000248 MILCON, USN APPN 1205 BA 01 Project 601694 APPN 1205 BA 01 PE 0216496N MILCON, USN PE 0816376N (Navy)
Project N0700091 MILCON, USN APPN 3300 PE 0207142F MILCON, AF (Air Force)
(Sunk)
UNCLASSIFIED
17
F-35
Track To Budget F-35 Engine

General Memo F-35 is DoD's largest cooperative development program. In addition to the above DoD funding lines, eight other International Partners are providing funding in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) Phase under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): United Kingdom, Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. All but Turkey and Australia were partners in the prior phase. Associated financial contributions are reflected in the Annual Funding section as Appropriation 9999, Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Non-Treasury Funds. RDT&E APPN 1319 BA 04 PE 0603800N RDT&E, Navy CDP APPN 1319 BA 05 Project 2262 APPN 1319 BA 05 Project 2261 Project 3194 Project 9999 PE 0604800M RDT&E, Marine Corps PE 0604800N RDT&E, Navy EMD/JSF RDT&E, Navy EMD/Joint Reprogramming Center RDT&E, Navy EMD/Congressional Adds PE 0603800F RDT&E, Air Force CDP APPN 3600 BA 05 Project 3831 PE 0604800F RDT&E, Air Force EMD/Joint Strike Fighter Quantity of RDT&E Articles PE 0603800E RDT&E, DARPA (DoD) (Sunk) (Air Force) (Navy) (Shared) (Navy) (Shared) (Shared) (Sunk) (Navy) (Sunk)
APPN 3600
BA 04
(Air Force) (Sunk)
APPN 0400
BA 03
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation cost excludes Follow-On Development Funding. Procurement
UNCLASSIFIED
18
F-35
APPN 1506
BA 01 ICN 0147
PE 0204146N JSF (Navy) PE 0204146M JSF (Marine Corps) PE 0204146N Initial Spares (Navy) PE 0204146M Initial Spares (Marine Corps) PE 0207142F Initial Spares (Air Force) PE 0207142F JSF (Air Force) PE 0207142F Mods (Air Force)
(Navy)
APPN 1506
BA 01 ICN 0152
(Navy)
APPN 1506
BA 06 ICN 0605
(Navy) (Shared) (Navy) (Shared) (Air Force) (Shared) (Air Force)
APPN 1506
BA 06 ICN 0605
APPN 3010
BA 06 ICN 000999
APPN 3010
BA 01 ICN ATA000
APPN 3010
BA 05 ICN F03500
(Air Force) (Sunk)
UNCLASSIFIED
19
F-35
Cost and Funding Cost Summary - Total Program

Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity - Total Program BY2012 $M Appropriation RDT&E Procurement Flyaway Recurring Non Recurring Support Other Support Initial Spares MILCON Acq O&M Total BY2012 $M TY $M SAR Current APB Current Baseline Development Estimate Dev Est Objective 34400.0 55233.8 55233.8 196600.0 335680.7 335680.7 166349.7 -- 290938.0 159390.4 -- 260071.4 6959.3 -- 30866.6 30250.3 -- 44742.7 21109.3 -- 24068.0 9141.0 -- 20674.7 2000.0 4797.3 4797.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 233000.0 395711.8 395711.8
SAR Current APB Current Baseline Development Estimate Dev Est Objective/Threshold 32300.0 59677.3 -59677.3 143300.0 266665.8 -- 266665.8 121215.6 --- 229571.3 116073.3 --- 203995.2 5142.3 --25576.1 22084.4 --37094.5 15403.4 --20686.4 6681.0 --16408.1 1500.0 4168.0 -4168.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 177100.0 330511.1 N/A 330511.1
UNCLASSIFIED
20
F-35
Cost and Funding Cost Summary - F-35 Aircraft

Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity - F-35 Aircraft BY2012 $M Appropriation RDT&E Procurement Flyaway Recurring Non Recurring Support Other Support Initial Spares MILCON Acq O&M Total BY2012 $M TY $M SAR Current APB Current Baseline Development Estimate Dev Est Objective 28685.7 44410.1 44410.1 163666.0 282647.8 282647.8 137304.4 -- 246537.6 131618.3 -- 219233.1 5686.1 -- 27304.5 26361.6 -- 36110.2 18368.8 -- 21661.0 7992.8 -- 14449.2 2000.0 4797.3 4797.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 194351.7 331855.2 331855.2
SAR Current APB Current Baseline Development Estimate Dev Est Objective/Threshold 32488.7 47982.1 52780.9 47982.1 144179.9 224332.9 246767.1 224332.9 120956.6 --- 194241.7 115938.0 --- 171769.6 5018.6 --22472.1 23223.3 --30091.2 16178.3 --18617.5 7045.0 --11473.7 1810.1 4168.0 4582.5 4168.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 178478.7 276483.0 N/A 276483.0
The Base Year for the program has been updated from FY 2002 to FY 2012 using a deflator of 1.221082. The development effort is 80% complete. The Service Cost Position for Research Development Test & Evaluation is within 1% of the CAPEs estimate. 25 F-35 aircraft have been delivered to date. These actuals were used to update the Service Cost Position for procurement which is within 2% of the CAPEs estimate. This estimate, like all previous Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) and Cost Assessment Program Evaluation (CAPE) estimates, is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure; is based on historical actual cost information to the maximum extent possible; and, most importantly, is based on conservative assumptions that are consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series of acquisition programs in which the Department has been successful. It is difficult to calculate mathematically the precise confidence levels associated with life-cycle cost estimates prepared for Major Defense Acquisition program (MDAP) programs. Based on the rigor in methods used in building estimates, the strong adherence to the collection and use of historical cost information, and the review of applied assumptions, we project that it is about equally likely that the estimates will prove too low or too high for execution of the program described. The F-35 Aircraft MILCON and O&S data contains both aircraft and engine data and is not broken out.
Quantity RDT&E Procurement Total
SAR Baseline Dev Est 14 2852 2866
Current APB Development 14 2443 2457
Current Estimate 14 2443 2457
UNCLASSIFIED
21
F-35
Cost Summary - F-35 Engine

Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity - F-35 Engine BY2012 $M Appropriation RDT&E Procurement Flyaway Recurring Non Recurring Support Other Support Initial Spares MILCON Acq O&M Total BY2012 $M TY $M SAR Current APB Current Baseline Development Estimate Dev Est Objective 5714.3 10823.7 10823.7 32934.0 53032.9 53032.9 29045.3 -- 44400.4 27772.1 -- 40838.3 1273.2 -- 3562.1 3888.7 -- 8632.5 2740.5 -- 2407.0 1148.2 -- 6225.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38648.3 63856.6 63856.6
SAR Current APB Current Baseline Development Estimate Dev Est Objective/Threshold 6488.0 11695.2 12741.9 11695.2 28741.5 42332.9 46566.2 42332.9 25315.6 --35329.6 24129.7 --32225.6 1185.9 --3104.0 3425.9 --7003.3 2408.9 --2068.9 1017.0 --4934.4 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 35229.5 54028.1 N/A 54028.1
The Base Year for the program has been updated from FY 2002 to FY 2012 using a deflator of 1.221082. The development effort is 80% complete. The Service Cost Position for Research Development Test & Evaluation is within 1% of the CAPEs estimate. 25 F-35 engines have been delivered to date. These actuals were used to update the Service Cost Position for procurement which is within 2% of the CAPEs estimate. This estimate, like all previous Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) and Cost Assessment Program Evaluation (CAPE) estimates, is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure; is based on historical actual cost information to the maximum extent possible; and, most importantly, is based on conservative assumptions that are consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series of acquisition programs in which the Department has been successful. It is difficult to calculate mathematically the precise confidence levels associated with life-cycle cost estimates prepared for Major Defense Acquisition program (MDAP) programs. Based on the rigor in methods used in building estimates, the strong adherence to the collection and use of historical cost information, and the review of applied assumptions, we project that it is about equally likely that the estimates will prove too low or too high for execution of the program described. The F-35 Engine subprogram contains both F135 and F136 data. The F-35 Engine subprogram sunk cost includes approximately $2.8B of development cost for the F136 engine. The USD (AT&L) directed termination of the F136 System Development and Demonstration contract for convenience of the Government in an Acquisition Decision Memorandum dated April 25, 2011. Termination costs are to be determined and will be updated when the termination is finalized with the contractor. The engine program includes the efforts to develop and procure a core engine for all three variants. It also includes the effort to develop and procure the STOVL lift fan nozzles (applies to STOVL aircraft only), and
UNCLASSIFIED
22
F-35
other hardware (e.g. STOVL roll post) required for full engine functionality and integration into the aircraft. It does not include the efforts of the prime contractor to integrate engine hardware with the aircraft; this effort is captured in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.
Quantity RDT&E Procurement Total
SAR Baseline Dev Est 14 2852 2866
Current APB Development 14 2443 2457
Current Estimate 14 2443 2457
UNCLASSIFIED
23
F-35
Cost and Funding Funding Summary - Total Program

Appropriation and Quantity Summary - Total Program FY2013 President's Budget / December 2011 SAR (TY$ M) Appropriation RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M PB 2013 Total PB 2012 Total Delta Prior 43824.3 21499.5 947.5 0.0 66271.3 65990.0 281.3 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 2850.6 2809.1 2251.4 1625.4 1102.3 6537.8 6471.7 6720.8 8276.1 10494.8 199.5 131.1 269.0 398.3 231.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9587.9 9411.9 9241.2 10299.8 11828.4 9743.2 10588.8 12093.2 13510.6 15523.2 -155.3 -1176.9 -2852.0 -3210.8 -3694.8 To Total Complete 615.7 155.0 55233.8 11791.8 263888.2 335680.7 158.7 2461.9 4797.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 12566.2 266505.1 395711.8 16626.1 235317.7 379392.8 -4059.9 31187.4 16319.0
UNCLASSIFIED
24
F-35
Cost and Funding Funding Summary - F-35 Aircraft

Appropriation and Quantity Summary - F-35 Aircraft FY2013 President's Budget / December 2011 SAR (TY$ M) Appropriation RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M PB 2013 Total PB 2012 Total Delta Quantity Development Production PB 2013 Total PB 2012 Total Delta Prior FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 To Total Complete 495.0 124.6 44410.1 9965.5 221893.2 282647.8 158.7 2461.9 4797.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10619.2 224479.7 331855.2 16626.1 235317.7 379392.8 -6006.9 -10838.0 -47537.6 To Complete 0 0 76 2078 76 2078 130 1898 -54 180 Total 14 2443 2457 2457 0
35236.6 2291.9 2258.6 1810.2 1306.9 886.3 18181.9 5624.6 5455.0 5683.4 6982.0 8862.2 947.5 199.5 131.1 269.0 398.3 231.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54366.0 8116.0 7844.7 7762.6 8687.2 9979.8 65990.0 9743.2 10588.8 12093.2 13510.6 15523.2 -11624.0 -1627.2 -2744.1 -4330.6 -4823.4 -5543.4
Undistributed Prior FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 14 0 14 14 0 0 90 90 90 0 0 31 31 32 -1 0 29 29 42 -13 0 29 29 62 -33 0 44 44 81 -37 0 66 66 108 -42
UNCLASSIFIED
25
F-35
Funding Summary - F-35 Engine

Appropriation and Quantity Summary - F-35 Engine FY2013 President's Budget / December 2011 SAR (TY$ M) Appropriation RDT&E Procurement MILCON Acq O&M PB 2013 Total PB 2012 Total Delta Quantity Development Production PB 2013 Total PB 2012 Total Delta Prior 8587.7 3317.6 0.0 0.0 11905.3 -0.0 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 558.7 913.2 0.0 0.0 1471.9 -0.0 550.5 1016.7 0.0 0.0 1567.2 -0.0 441.2 1037.4 0.0 0.0 1478.6 -0.0 318.5 1294.1 0.0 0.0 1612.6 -0.0 216.0 1632.6 0.0 0.0 1848.6 -0.0 To Complete 120.7 30.4 1826.3 41995.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1947.0 42025.4 --0.0 0.0 Total 10823.7 53032.9 0.0 0.0 63856.6 0.0 63856.6 Total 14 2443 2457 0 2457
Undistributed Prior FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 14 0 14 0 14 0 90 90 0 90 0 31 31 0 31 0 29 29 0 29 0 29 29 0 29 0 44 44 0 44 0 66 66 0 66
To Complete 0 0 76 2078 76 2078 0 0 76 2078
UNCLASSIFIED
26
F-35
Cost and Funding Annual Funding By Appropriation - F-35 Aircraft

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 1994 ------23.7 1995 ------79.0 1996 ------64.6 1997 ------195.6 1998 ------360.4 1999 ------378.9 2000 ------191.7 2001 ------274.3 2002 ------580.0 2003 ------1319.4 2004 ------1673.5 2005 ------1675.5 2006 ------1758.4 2007 ------1696.0 2008 ------1486.6 2009 ------1370.3 2010 ------1516.6 2011 ------1010.1 2012 ------1053.5 2013 ------1183.9 2014 ------1015.9 2015 ------822.3 2016 ------598.7 2017 ------369.9 2018 ------61.9 Subtotal 9 -----20760.7
UNCLASSIFIED
27
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1994 ------31.9 1995 ------104.4 1996 ------84.0 1997 ------251.2 1998 ------459.0 1999 ------477.0 2000 ------237.8 2001 ------335.7 2002 ------702.7 2003 ------1575.5 2004 ------1944.1 2005 ------1896.5 2006 ------1930.2 2007 ------1817.2 2008 ------1564.3 2009 ------1423.6 2010 ------1552.1 2011 ------1014.3 2012 ------1039.5 2013 ------1149.1 2014 ------969.3 2015 ------770.7 2016 ------551.2 2017 ------334.6 2018 ------55.0 Subtotal 9 -----22270.9
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation cost excludes Follow-On Development Funding.
UNCLASSIFIED
28
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 1995 ------67.4 1996 ------65.4 1997 ------202.3 1998 ------357.2 1999 ------366.7 2000 ------200.3 2001 ------274.3 2002 ------572.8 2003 ------1295.0 2004 ------1624.1 2005 ------1672.5 2006 ------1821.0 2007 ------1667.6 2008 ------1571.9 2009 ------1400.7 2010 ------1635.0 2011 ------749.1 2012 ------1115.9 2013 ------958.8 2014 ------792.0 2015 ------484.6 2016 ------287.6 2017 ------125.1 2018 ------62.7 Subtotal 5 -----19370.0
UNCLASSIFIED
29
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1995 ------89.1 1996 ------85.0 1997 ------259.8 1998 ------454.9 1999 ------461.6 2000 ------248.5 2001 ------335.7 2002 ------694.0 2003 ------1546.4 2004 ------1886.7 2005 ------1893.1 2006 ------1998.9 2007 ------1786.8 2008 ------1654.0 2009 ------1455.1 2010 ------1673.2 2011 ------752.2 2012 ------1101.1 2013 ------930.7 2014 ------755.7 2015 ------454.2 2016 ------264.8 2017 ------113.1 2018 ------55.7 Subtotal 5 -----20950.3
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation cost excludes Follow-On Development Funding.
UNCLASSIFIED
30
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 1996 ------23.2 1997 ------54.8 1998 ------16.9 Subtotal ------94.9
UNCLASSIFIED
31
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1996 ------30.1 1997 ------70.3 1998 ------21.5 Subtotal ------121.9
UNCLASSIFIED
32
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds Fiscal Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Subtotal End Item Recurring Flyaway TY $M --------------------Non End Item Recurring Flyaway TY $M --------------------Non Recurring Flyaway TY $M --------------------Total Flyaway TY $M --------------------Total Support TY $M --------------------Total Program TY $M 11.3 57.1 62.1 44.0 27.7 2.0 246.4 342.4 416.3 609.6 645.4 571.1 444.4 206.9 107.6 149.5 122.5 115.9 2.3 4184.5
Quantity
---------------------
UNCLASSIFIED
33
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1996 ------14.7 1997 ------73.3 1998 ------79.1 1999 ------55.4 2000 ------34.4 2001 ------2.4 2002 ------298.5 2003 ------408.9 2004 ------483.6 2005 ------690.0 2006 ------708.5 2007 ------611.9 2008 ------467.6 2009 ------214.9 2010 ------110.1 2011 ------150.1 2012 ------120.9 2013 ------112.5 2014 ------2.2 Subtotal ------4639.0
UNCLASSIFIED
34
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 2007 -97.1 --97.1 -97.1 2008 6 925.4 -38.7 964.1 10.7 974.8 2009 7 1067.1 -182.8 1249.9 207.1 1457.0 2010 20 2737.8 -310.8 3048.6 572.7 3621.3 2011 10 1707.9 -287.5 1995.4 493.4 2488.8 2012 13 1398.7 -315.3 1714.0 706.8 2420.8 2013 10 1161.2 -347.6 1508.8 695.5 2204.3 2014 10 1161.1 -391.2 1552.3 915.6 2467.9 2015 12 1260.7 -629.6 1890.3 726.6 2616.9 2016 18 1738.6 -689.7 2428.3 797.5 3225.8 2017 28 2409.8 -788.2 3198.0 1184.8 4382.8 2018 50 4345.9 -624.6 4970.5 927.7 5898.2 2019 50 4084.9 -653.7 4738.6 899.9 5638.5 2020 50 4104.0 -492.4 4596.4 1133.1 5729.5 2021 50 4157.9 -501.4 4659.3 1313.8 5973.1 2022 50 4220.4 -499.8 4720.2 915.8 5636.0 2023 50 4205.6 -504.8 4710.4 906.8 5617.2 2024 50 4314.8 -512.3 4827.1 824.8 5651.9 2025 50 4393.6 -522.4 4916.0 905.8 5821.8 2026 50 4472.5 -525.3 4997.8 813.7 5811.5 2027 50 4448.0 -478.0 4926.0 423.3 5349.3 2028 36 3138.6 -324.3 3462.9 288.4 3751.3 2029 10 958.9 -95.8 1054.7 125.9 1180.6 Subtotal 680 62510.5 -9716.2 72226.7 15789.7 88016.4
UNCLASSIFIED
35
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 2007 -102.6 --102.6 -102.6 2008 6 963.7 -40.4 1004.1 11.1 1015.2 2009 7 1095.8 -187.7 1283.5 212.7 1496.2 2010 20 2760.2 -313.3 3073.5 577.4 3650.9 2011 10 1691.2 -284.7 1975.9 488.6 2464.5 2012 13 1361.7 -307.0 1668.7 688.1 2356.8 2013 10 1111.5 -332.7 1444.2 665.7 2109.9 2014 10 1092.0 -367.9 1459.9 861.2 2321.1 2015 12 1164.7 -581.7 1746.4 671.3 2417.7 2016 18 1577.8 -626.0 2203.8 723.7 2927.5 2017 28 2148.3 -702.7 2851.0 1056.2 3907.2 2018 50 3805.8 -546.9 4352.7 812.5 5165.2 2019 50 3514.0 -562.3 4076.3 774.2 4850.5 2020 50 3468.0 -416.1 3884.1 957.5 4841.6 2021 50 3451.4 -416.2 3867.6 1090.6 4958.2 2022 50 3441.4 -407.5 3848.9 746.8 4595.7 2023 50 3368.7 -404.2 3772.9 726.4 4499.3 2024 50 3395.0 -403.2 3798.2 648.9 4447.1 2025 50 3395.9 -403.8 3799.7 700.1 4499.8 2026 50 3395.7 -398.9 3794.6 617.8 4412.4 2027 50 3317.4 -356.4 3673.8 315.8 3989.6 2028 36 2299.5 -237.5 2537.0 211.3 2748.3 2029 10 690.1 -69.0 759.1 90.6 849.7 Subtotal 680 52612.4 -8366.1 60978.5 13648.5 74627.0
UNCLASSIFIED
36
F-35
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Aircraft 1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy End Item Recurring Flyaway Fiscal (Aligned Quantity Year with Quantity) BY 2012 $M 2007 --2008 6 963.7 2009 7 1095.8 2010 20 2760.2 2011 10 1691.2 2012 13 1361.7 2013 10 1111.5 2014 10 1092.0 2015 12 1164.7 2016 18 1577.8 2017 28 2148.3 2018 50 3805.8 2019 50 3514.0 2020 50 3468.0 2021 50 3451.4 2022 50 3441.4 2023 50 3368.7 2024 50 3395.0 2025 50 3415.9 2026 50 3415.7 2027 50 3347.4 2028 36 2329.5 2029 10 692.7 Subtotal 680 52612.4
UNCLASSIFIED
37
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 2006 -107.2 --107.2 -107.2 2007 2 428.5 -80.5 509.0 91.1 600.1 2008 6 983.1 -171.9 1155.0 131.5 1286.5 2009 7 1009.2 -276.8 1286.0 175.8 1461.8 2010 10 1471.2 -355.7 1826.9 277.7 2104.6 2011 22 2751.2 -551.9 3303.1 679.6 3982.7 2012 18 2041.5 -369.3 2410.8 793.0 3203.8 2013 19 2052.4 -588.2 2640.6 610.1 3250.7 2014 19 2026.6 -641.3 2667.9 547.6 3215.5 2015 32 2996.7 -743.2 3739.9 625.2 4365.1 2016 48 3887.0 -942.4 4829.4 807.0 5636.4 2017 48 3792.3 -937.9 4730.2 852.5 5582.7 2018 60 4262.7 -613.4 4876.1 761.5 5637.6 2019 60 4296.3 -411.3 4707.6 660.6 5368.2 2020 60 4467.6 -461.6 4929.2 915.3 5844.5 2021 80 5806.3 -533.7 6340.0 980.4 7320.4 2022 80 5946.1 -544.3 6490.4 1016.0 7506.4 2023 80 6014.3 -551.2 6565.5 903.4 7468.9 2024 80 6186.3 -566.5 6752.8 966.6 7719.4 2025 80 6337.8 -576.1 6913.9 861.7 7775.6 2026 80 6478.9 -589.5 7068.4 895.4 7963.8 2027 80 6633.1 -605.3 7238.4 907.0 8145.4 2028 80 6899.1 -625.3 7524.4 739.0 8263.4 2029 80 7200.2 -650.8 7851.0 778.7 8629.7 2030 80 7442.8 -671.1 8113.9 843.2 8957.1 2031 80 7643.5 -688.4 8331.9 930.2 9262.1 2032 80 7855.8 -698.0 8553.8 650.6 9204.4 2033 80 8074.3 -711.8 8786.1 517.0 9303.1 2034 80 8294.2 -723.2 9017.4 382.0 9399.4 2035 80 8426.4 -727.2 9153.6 390.1 9543.7 2036 80 8219.3 -626.8 8846.1 324.3 9170.4 2037 72 6690.7 -353.7 7044.4 306.4 7350.8 Subtotal 1763 156722.6 -17588.3 174310.9 20320.5 194631.4
UNCLASSIFIED
38
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 2006 -116.0 --116.0 -116.0 2007 2 453.0 -85.1 538.1 96.3 634.4 2008 6 1023.8 -179.1 1202.9 136.9 1339.8 2009 7 1036.3 -284.3 1320.6 180.5 1501.1 2010 10 1478.1 -357.4 1835.5 279.0 2114.5 2011 22 2715.0 -544.8 3259.8 670.6 3930.4 2012 18 1980.5 -358.3 2338.8 769.3 3108.1 2013 19 1957.5 -561.0 2518.5 581.9 3100.4 2014 19 1899.2 -601.0 2500.2 513.2 3013.4 2015 32 2758.7 -684.2 3442.9 575.5 4018.4 2016 48 3515.0 -852.2 4367.2 729.8 5097.0 2017 48 3368.7 -833.2 4201.9 757.2 4959.1 2018 60 3719.6 -535.4 4255.0 664.4 4919.4 2019 60 3682.7 -352.6 4035.3 566.2 4601.5 2020 60 3761.8 -388.7 4150.5 770.6 4921.1 2021 80 4802.5 -441.4 5243.9 811.0 6054.9 2022 80 4831.2 -442.2 5273.4 825.6 6099.0 2023 80 4800.2 -440.0 5240.2 721.0 5961.2 2024 80 4850.2 -444.1 5294.3 757.9 6052.2 2025 80 4881.1 -443.7 5324.8 663.6 5988.4 2026 80 4901.6 -445.9 5347.5 677.4 6024.9 2027 80 4929.5 -449.9 5379.4 674.0 6053.4 2028 80 5036.5 -456.5 5493.0 539.5 6032.5 2029 80 5163.4 -466.7 5630.1 558.4 6188.5 2030 80 5243.0 -472.7 5715.7 594.0 6309.7 2031 80 5289.1 -476.4 5765.5 643.7 6409.2 2032 80 5339.9 -474.4 5814.3 442.3 6256.6 2033 80 5391.4 -475.3 5866.7 345.2 6211.9 2034 80 5440.3 -474.3 5914.6 250.6 6165.2 2035 80 5429.3 -468.6 5897.9 251.3 6149.2 2036 80 5202.2 -396.7 5598.9 205.3 5804.2 2037 72 4159.9 -219.9 4379.8 190.5 4570.3 Subtotal 1763 119157.2 -14106.0 133263.2 16442.7 149705.9
UNCLASSIFIED
39
F-35
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Aircraft 3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force End Item Recurring Flyaway Fiscal (Aligned Quantity Year with Quantity) BY 2012 $M 2006 --2007 2 453.0 2008 6 1023.8 2009 7 1036.3 2010 10 1478.1 2011 22 2715.0 2012 18 1980.5 2013 19 1957.5 2014 19 1899.2 2015 32 2758.7 2016 48 3515.0 2017 48 3368.7 2018 60 3719.6 2019 60 3682.7 2020 60 3761.8 2021 80 4802.5 2022 80 4831.2 2023 80 4800.2 2024 80 4850.2 2025 80 4881.1 2026 80 4901.6 2027 80 4929.5 2028 80 5036.5 2029 80 5163.4 2030 80 5243.0 2031 80 5289.1 2032 80 5359.9 2033 80 5431.4 2034 80 5480.3 2035 80 5449.3 2036 80 5228.2 2037 72 4129.9 Subtotal 1763 119157.2
UNCLASSIFIED
40
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Total Fiscal Program Year TY $M 2004 24.4 2005 -2006 0.1 2007 -2008 0.2 2009 0.7 2010 34.1 2011 377.9 2012 144.4 2013 117.6 2014 209.0 2015 320.5 2016 151.7 2017 48.1 2018 -2019 169.7 2020 175.8 2021 105.2 2022 79.8 2023 -2024 300.1 Subtotal 2259.3
UNCLASSIFIED
41
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps Total Fiscal Program Year BY 2012 $M 2004 27.8 2005 -2006 0.1 2007 -2008 0.2 2009 0.7 2010 34.1 2011 371.4 2012 139.5 2013 111.7 2014 195.0 2015 293.7 2016 136.6 2017 42.5 2018 -2019 144.8 2020 147.4 2021 86.6 2022 64.6 2023 -2024 234.2 Subtotal 2030.9
UNCLASSIFIED
42
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Aircraft 3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air Force Total Fiscal Program Year TY $M 2004 19.1 2005 10.0 2006 -2007 -2008 100.3 2009 116.0 2010 125.1 2011 139.6 2012 55.1 2013 13.5 2014 60.0 2015 77.8 2016 79.6 2017 110.6 2018 77.1 2019 91.5 2020 134.6 2021 66.6 2022 73.1 2023 167.0 2024 142.3 2025 122.1 2026 118.4 2027 129.9 2028 101.8 2029 102.7 2030 94.6 2031 71.7 2032 71.2 2033 37.5 2034 24.8 2035 4.4 Subtotal 2538.0
UNCLASSIFIED
43
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Aircraft 3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air Force Total Fiscal Program Year BY 2012 $M 2004 21.7 2005 11.1 2006 -2007 -2008 104.4 2009 119.0 2010 125.7 2011 137.6 2012 53.4 2013 12.9 2014 56.2 2015 71.5 2016 71.9 2017 98.1 2018 67.2 2019 78.3 2020 113.2 2021 55.0 2022 59.3 2023 133.1 2024 111.4 2025 93.9 2026 89.5 2027 96.4 2028 74.2 2029 73.6 2030 66.6 2031 49.6 2032 48.3 2033 25.0 2034 16.2 2035 2.8 Subtotal 2137.1
UNCLASSIFIED
44
F-35
Annual Funding By Appropriation - F-35 Engine

Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine 3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 1995 ------16.4 1996 ------15.9 1997 ------49.3 1998 ------87.1 1999 ------89.4 2000 ------48.8 2001 ------66.9 2002 ------139.6 2003 ------315.6 2004 ------395.8 2005 ------407.6 2006 ------443.8 2007 ------406.4 2008 ------383.1 2009 ------341.4 2010 ------398.5 2011 ------182.5 2012 ------272.0 2013 ------233.7 2014 ------193.0 2015 ------118.1 2016 ------70.1 2017 ------30.5 2018 ------15.3 Subtotal 5 -----4720.8
UNCLASSIFIED
45
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine 3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1995 ------21.7 1996 ------20.7 1997 ------63.3 1998 ------110.9 1999 ------112.5 2000 ------60.5 2001 ------81.9 2002 ------169.1 2003 ------376.9 2004 ------459.8 2005 ------461.4 2006 ------487.2 2007 ------435.4 2008 ------403.1 2009 ------354.7 2010 ------407.8 2011 ------183.3 2012 ------268.4 2013 ------226.8 2014 ------184.2 2015 ------110.7 2016 ------64.5 2017 ------27.6 2018 ------13.6 Subtotal 5 -----5106.0
UNCLASSIFIED
46
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine 1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 1994 ------5.8 1995 ------19.3 1996 ------15.8 1997 ------47.7 1998 ------87.8 1999 ------92.4 2000 ------46.7 2001 ------66.9 2002 ------141.3 2003 ------321.5 2004 ------407.9 2005 ------408.3 2006 ------428.5 2007 ------413.4 2008 ------362.3 2009 ------334.0 2010 ------369.6 2011 ------246.2 2012 ------256.8 2013 ------288.5 2014 ------247.6 2015 ------200.4 2016 ------145.9 2017 ------90.2 2018 ------15.1 Subtotal 9 -----5059.9
UNCLASSIFIED
47
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine 1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1994 ------7.8 1995 ------25.5 1996 ------20.5 1997 ------61.3 1998 ------111.8 1999 ------116.3 2000 ------57.9 2001 ------81.9 2002 ------171.2 2003 ------383.9 2004 ------473.9 2005 ------462.2 2006 ------470.4 2007 ------442.9 2008 ------381.2 2009 ------347.0 2010 ------378.2 2011 ------247.2 2012 ------253.4 2013 ------280.0 2014 ------236.3 2015 ------187.8 2016 ------134.3 2017 ------81.6 2018 ------13.4 Subtotal 9 -----5427.9
UNCLASSIFIED
48
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine 9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds Fiscal Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Subtotal End Item Recurring Flyaway TY $M --------------------Non End Item Recurring Flyaway TY $M --------------------Non Recurring Flyaway TY $M --------------------Total Flyaway TY $M --------------------Total Support TY $M --------------------Total Program TY $M 2.7 13.9 15.1 10.7 6.8 0.5 60.0 83.4 101.5 148.6 157.3 139.2 108.3 50.4 26.2 36.4 29.9 28.3 0.6 1019.8
Quantity
---------------------
UNCLASSIFIED
49
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine 9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1996 ------3.5 1997 ------17.8 1998 ------19.2 1999 ------13.5 2000 ------8.4 2001 ------0.6 2002 ------72.7 2003 ------99.6 2004 ------117.9 2005 ------168.2 2006 ------172.7 2007 ------149.1 2008 ------114.0 2009 ------52.4 2010 ------26.8 2011 ------36.6 2012 ------29.5 2013 ------27.5 2014 ------0.6 Subtotal ------1130.6
UNCLASSIFIED
50
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine 0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 1994 ------5.7 1995 ------13.4 1996 ------4.1 Subtotal ------23.2
UNCLASSIFIED
51
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine 0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 1994 ------7.7 1995 ------17.7 1996 ------5.3 Subtotal ------30.7
UNCLASSIFIED
52
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine 3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 2006 -9.8 --9.8 -9.8 2007 2 47.5 -6.9 54.4 27.7 82.1 2008 6 123.6 -35.0 158.6 30.9 189.5 2009 7 127.0 -63.9 190.9 33.3 224.2 2010 10 176.7 -72.6 249.3 59.1 308.4 2011 22 353.2 -91.6 444.8 136.6 581.4 2012 18 275.3 -66.0 341.3 123.0 464.3 2013 19 288.0 -98.5 386.5 110.3 496.8 2014 19 291.9 -98.8 390.7 107.0 497.7 2015 32 448.5 -113.1 561.6 131.5 693.1 2016 48 595.4 -138.8 734.2 153.7 887.9 2017 48 596.7 -130.0 726.7 156.4 883.1 2018 60 725.0 -75.7 800.7 168.9 969.6 2019 60 740.9 -35.5 776.4 174.9 951.3 2020 60 773.8 -42.7 816.5 187.2 1003.7 2021 80 1007.3 -42.6 1049.9 248.7 1298.6 2022 80 1025.4 -42.8 1068.2 225.9 1294.1 2023 80 1032.7 -43.5 1076.2 253.0 1329.2 2024 80 1053.3 -44.2 1097.5 250.9 1348.4 2025 80 1070.1 -44.3 1114.4 208.3 1322.7 2026 80 1086.4 -45.1 1131.5 254.8 1386.3 2027 80 1104.0 -46.4 1150.4 260.3 1410.7 2028 80 1136.6 -47.0 1183.6 209.5 1393.1 2029 80 1173.8 -48.0 1221.8 244.6 1466.4 2030 80 1202.4 -48.9 1251.3 273.8 1525.1 2031 80 1222.1 -49.9 1272.0 288.9 1560.9 2032 80 1242.3 -49.5 1291.8 194.9 1486.7 2033 80 1263.3 -49.8 1313.1 183.0 1496.1 2034 80 1283.9 -49.7 1333.6 171.4 1505.0 2035 80 1302.1 -48.8 1350.9 175.3 1526.2 2036 80 1317.1 -26.9 1344.0 145.7 1489.7 2037 72 1066.5 --1066.5 137.7 1204.2 Subtotal 1763 25162.6 -1796.5 26959.1 5327.2 32286.3
UNCLASSIFIED
53
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine 3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 2006 -10.6 --10.6 -10.6 2007 2 50.2 -7.3 57.5 29.3 86.8 2008 6 128.7 -36.5 165.2 32.2 197.4 2009 7 130.4 -65.6 196.0 34.2 230.2 2010 10 177.5 -73.0 250.5 59.4 309.9 2011 22 348.6 -90.4 439.0 134.8 573.8 2012 18 267.1 -64.0 331.1 119.3 450.4 2013 19 274.7 -93.9 368.6 105.2 473.8 2014 19 273.6 -92.6 366.2 100.2 466.4 2015 32 412.9 -104.0 516.9 121.1 638.0 2016 48 538.4 -125.5 663.9 139.0 802.9 2017 48 530.1 -115.4 645.5 139.0 784.5 2018 60 632.6 -66.1 698.7 147.4 846.1 2019 60 635.1 -30.4 665.5 149.9 815.4 2020 60 651.6 -36.0 687.6 157.5 845.1 2021 80 833.2 -35.2 868.4 205.7 1074.1 2022 80 833.1 -34.8 867.9 183.6 1051.5 2023 80 824.2 -34.7 858.9 202.0 1060.9 2024 80 825.8 -34.7 860.5 196.7 1057.2 2025 80 824.1 -34.1 858.2 160.5 1018.7 2026 80 821.9 -34.1 856.0 192.8 1048.8 2027 80 820.5 -34.5 855.0 193.4 1048.4 2028 80 829.7 -34.3 864.0 153.0 1017.0 2029 80 841.7 -34.4 876.1 175.5 1051.6 2030 80 847.0 -34.4 881.4 192.9 1074.3 2031 80 845.7 -34.5 880.2 199.9 1080.1 2032 80 844.4 -33.6 878.0 132.6 1010.6 2033 80 843.5 -33.3 876.8 122.2 999.0 2034 80 842.1 -32.6 874.7 112.5 987.2 2035 80 839.0 -31.4 870.4 113.0 983.4 2036 80 833.6 -17.0 850.6 92.3 942.9 2037 72 663.1 --663.1 85.6 748.7 Subtotal 1763 19074.7 -1528.3 20603.0 4182.7 24785.7
UNCLASSIFIED
54
F-35
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Engine 3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force End Item Recurring Flyaway Fiscal (Aligned Quantity Year with Quantity) BY 2012 $M 2006 --2007 2 50.3 2008 6 128.7 2009 7 130.0 2010 10 177.4 2011 22 348.5 2012 18 267.1 2013 19 274.7 2014 19 273.5 2015 32 412.8 2016 48 538.4 2017 48 530.0 2018 60 632.6 2019 60 635.0 2020 60 651.5 2021 80 833.1 2022 80 833.1 2023 80 824.2 2024 80 825.7 2025 80 824.1 2026 80 821.8 2027 80 820.4 2028 80 829.7 2029 80 841.7 2030 80 846.9 2031 80 845.6 2032 80 844.4 2033 80 843.5 2034 80 846.1 2035 80 840.9 2036 80 837.6 2037 72 665.4 Subtotal 1763 19074.7
UNCLASSIFIED
55
F-35
Annual Funding TY$ - F-35 Engine 1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M TY $M 2007 -27.4 --27.4 -27.4 2008 6 246.1 -1.3 247.4 1.2 248.6 2009 7 298.0 -54.3 352.3 65.6 417.9 2010 20 557.7 -110.3 668.0 118.8 786.8 2011 10 278.3 -78.2 356.5 85.0 441.5 2012 13 276.2 -83.3 359.5 89.4 448.9 2013 10 295.3 -117.7 413.0 106.9 519.9 2014 10 284.4 -108.7 393.1 146.6 539.7 2015 12 306.3 -168.0 474.3 126.7 601.0 2016 18 421.0 -174.8 595.8 148.9 744.7 2017 28 579.2 -166.7 745.9 197.3 943.2 2018 50 1109.7 -97.2 1206.9 198.0 1404.9 2019 50 1068.3 -105.8 1174.1 179.5 1353.6 2020 50 1094.9 -60.0 1154.9 244.0 1398.9 2021 50 1115.7 -61.8 1177.5 298.8 1476.3 2022 50 1131.3 -59.8 1191.1 193.9 1385.0 2023 50 1129.7 -60.8 1190.5 235.4 1425.9 2024 50 1152.2 -60.7 1212.9 209.1 1422.0 2025 50 1164.6 -61.5 1226.1 233.9 1460.0 2026 50 1177.1 -60.4 1237.5 206.0 1443.5 2027 50 1159.6 -46.1 1205.7 114.2 1319.9 2028 36 666.3 -22.6 688.9 78.8 767.7 2029 10 136.4 -5.6 142.0 27.3 169.3 Subtotal 680 15675.7 -1765.6 17441.3 3305.3 20746.6
UNCLASSIFIED
56
F-35
Annual Funding BY$ - F-35 Engine 1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy Non End End Item Non Item Total Total Total Fiscal Recurring Recurring Quantity Recurring Flyaway Support Program Year Flyaway Flyaway Flyaway BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M BY 2012 $M 2007 -29.0 --29.0 -29.0 2008 6 256.3 -1.4 257.7 1.2 258.9 2009 7 306.0 -55.8 361.8 67.3 429.1 2010 20 562.3 -111.1 673.4 119.8 793.2 2011 10 275.6 -77.4 353.0 84.2 437.2 2012 13 268.9 -81.1 350.0 87.0 437.0 2013 10 282.7 -112.5 395.2 102.4 497.6 2014 10 267.5 -102.3 369.8 137.8 507.6 2015 12 283.0 -155.1 438.1 117.1 555.2 2016 18 382.1 -158.5 540.6 135.2 675.8 2017 28 516.3 -148.7 665.0 175.9 840.9 2018 50 971.8 -85.1 1056.9 173.4 1230.3 2019 50 919.0 -91.0 1010.0 154.4 1164.4 2020 50 925.2 -50.7 975.9 206.2 1182.1 2021 50 926.1 -51.3 977.4 248.1 1225.5 2022 50 922.5 -48.8 971.3 158.0 1129.3 2023 50 904.9 -48.7 953.6 188.5 1142.1 2024 50 906.6 -47.8 954.4 164.5 1118.9 2025 50 900.1 -47.5 947.6 180.9 1128.5 2026 50 893.7 -45.9 939.6 156.4 1096.0 2027 50 864.9 -34.4 899.3 85.1 984.4 2028 36 488.2 -16.6 504.8 57.6 562.4 2029 10 98.2 -4.0 102.2 19.6 121.8 Subtotal 680 13150.9 -1575.7 14726.6 2820.6 17547.2
UNCLASSIFIED
57
F-35
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Engine 1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy End Item Recurring Flyaway Fiscal (Aligned Quantity Year with Quantity) BY 2012 $M 2007 --2008 6 256.3 2009 7 306.0 2010 20 562.3 2011 10 275.6 2012 13 268.9 2013 10 282.7 2014 10 267.5 2015 12 283.0 2016 18 382.1 2017 28 516.3 2018 50 971.8 2019 50 919.0 2020 50 925.2 2021 50 926.1 2022 50 922.5 2023 50 904.9 2024 50 906.6 2025 50 900.1 2026 50 893.7 2027 50 874.9 2028 36 498.2 2029 10 107.2 Subtotal 680 13150.9
UNCLASSIFIED
58
F-35
Low Rate Initial Production F-35 Aircraft

Initial LRIP Decision 10/26/2001 465 Original MS B ADM 2006 2015 Current Total LRIP 2/24/2010 365 Restructure ADM 2006 2018
Approval Date Approved Quantity Reference Start Year End Year
The Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) approved the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) quantity of 465 (in six LRIP lots) in the original Milestone B Acquisition Decision Memorandum dated October 26, 2001. The current total LRIP quantity is more than 10% of the current production quantity which is necessary to prevent a break in production and to ramp up to full rate production. The LRIP quantity has been revised to 365 (in 11 LRIP lots) based on Department decisions and the FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act and the FY 2013 President's Budget. The current LRIP quantity also exceeds 10% for the reasons cited above.
Low Rate Initial Production F-35 Engine

Initial LRIP Decision 10/26/2001 465 Original MS B ADM 2006 2015 Current Total LRIP 2/24/2010 365 Restructure ADM 2006 2018
Approval Date Approved Quantity Reference Start Year End Year
The Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) approved the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) quantity of 465 engine installs to support LRIP aircraft production (in six LRIP lots) in the original Milestone B Acquisition Decision Memorandum dated October 26, 2001. The current total LRIP quantity is more than 10% of the current production quantity which is necessary to prevent a break in production and to ramp up to full rate production. The LRIP quantity has been revised to 365 engine installs to support LRIP aircract production (in 11 LRIP lots) based on Department decisions and the FY 2012 National Defense Authorization Act and the FY 2013 President's Budget. The current LRIP quantity also exceeds 10% for the reasons cited above.
UNCLASSIFIED
59
F-35
Foreign Military Sales F-35 Aircraft

Country Israel Date of Total Quantity Memo Sale Cost $M 10/7/2010 19 2750.0 All 19 aircraft will be Conventional Take Off and Landing (CTOL) variant.
Foreign Military Sales F-35 Engine

Foreign Military Sales information for the F-35 Engine subprogram are reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.
Nuclear Cost
F-35 Aircraft None F-35 Engine None
UNCLASSIFIED
60
F-35
Unit Cost F-35 Aircraft Unit Cost Report
Unit Cost Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) Cost Quantity Unit Cost Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC) Cost Quantity Unit Cost
BY2012 $M Current UCR Baseline (MAR 2012 APB) 276482.2 2458 112.483 224333.7 2443 91.827 BY2012 $M Revised Original UCR Baseline (MAR 2012 APB) 276482.2 2458 112.483 224333.7 2443 91.827
BY2012 $M Current Estimate (DEC 2011 SAR) 276483.0 2457 112.529 224332.9 2443 91.827 BY2012 $M Current Estimate (DEC 2011 SAR) BY % Change BY % Change
+0.04
0.00
276483.0 2457 112.529 224332.9 2443 91.827
+0.04
0.00
The DoD average F-35 Aircraft Unit Recurring Flyaway (URF) Cost consists of the Hardware (Airframe, Vehicle Systems, Mission Systems, and Engineering Change Order) costs over the life of the program. The URF assumes the quantity benefits of 19 Foreign Military Sales aircraft and 697 International Partner aircraft. F-35A (Conventional Takeoff and Landing) URF - $67.8 M (BY 2012) F-35B (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) URF - $78.8 M (BY 2012) F-35C (Carrier Variant) URF - $76.1 M (BY 2012)
UNCLASSIFIED
61
F-35
F-35 Aircraft Unit Cost History
Original APB APB as of January 2006 Revised Original APB Prior APB Current APB Prior Annual SAR Current Estimate
Date OCT 2001 MAR 2004 MAR 2012 MAR 2007 MAR 2012 DEC 2010 DEC 2011
BY2012 $M PAUC APUC 74.567 60.632 94.837 73.845 112.483 91.827 104.363 83.467 112.483 91.827 132.900 109.536 112.529 91.827
TY $M PAUC APUC 81.298 68.934 100.407 81.826 135.010 115.697 113.318 94.857 135.010 115.697 154.413 132.806 135.065 115.697
SAR Unit Cost History
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M) Initial PAUC Dev Est 67.813 Changes Eng Est 4.365 44.276 PAUC Current Est 135.065
Econ -1.421
Qty 2.585
Sch 14.022
Oth 0.000
Spt 3.425
Total 67.252
UNCLASSIFIED
62
F-35
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M) Initial APUC Dev Est 57.386 Changes Eng Est 3.259 40.906 APUC Current Est 115.697
Econ -1.615
Qty 0.803
Sch 11.513
Oth 0.000
Spt 3.445
Total 58.311
SAR Baseline History SAR Planning Estimate (PE) N/A MAR 2001 TBD TBD 24800.0 N/A N/A SAR Development Estimate (DE) NOV 1996 NOV 2010 APR 2016 DEC 2012 194351.7 2866 67.813 SAR Production Estimate (PdE) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current Estimate NOV 1996 OCT 2001 APR 2019 TBD 331855.2 2457 135.065
Item/Event Milestone I Milestone B Milestone C IOC Total Cost (TY $M) Total Quantity Prog. Acq. Unit Cost (PAUC)
Pursuant to section 2433, title 10, United States Code, the SAR Planning Estimate reflected Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation cost only. The Services are currently reviewing their Initial Operational Capabilities (IOC) based on the restructured F-35 Program. The IOCs are determined by the Services based on both the program's performance and how the Services define IOC. Each Service has a somewhat different definition, depending on what capabilities they intend to have at IOC, their operational test and training requirements, and the number of aircraft they require for IOC. The Services have requested, with the support of the Department, waiting to establish an Initial Operational Capability (IOC) date. The US Services require more definition in the program schedule regarding IOC requirements, to include operational test dates, before targeting a timeline. They are pleased with the progress they have witnessed over the past year, but wish to observe additional results during 2012. The program anticipates the Services will identify their IOC dates in 2013.
UNCLASSIFIED
63
F-35
F-35 Engine Unit Cost Report
BY2012 $M Current UCR Baseline (MAR 2012 APB) 53916.4 2458 21.935 42332.9 2443 17.328 BY2012 $M Original UCR Baseline (MAR 2012 APB) 53916.4 2458 21.935 42332.9 2443 17.328
BY2012 $M Current Estimate (DEC 2011 SAR) 54028.1 2457 21.989 42332.9 2443 17.328 BY2012 $M Current Estimate (DEC 2011 SAR) 54028.1 2457 21.989 42332.9 2443 17.328 BY % Change BY % Change
+0.25
0.00
+0.25
0.00
The DoD average F-35 Engine Unit Recurring Flyaway (URF) Cost consists of the Hardware (Propulsion and Engineering Change Order) costs over the life of the program. The URF assumes the quantity benefits of 19 Foreign Military Sales engines and 697 International Partner engines. F-35A (Conventional Takeoff and Landing) URF - $10.9 M (BY 2012) F-35B (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) URF - $27.7 M (BY 2012) F-35C (Carrier Variant) URF - $10.9 M (BY 2012)
UNCLASSIFIED
64
F-35
F-35 Engine Unit Cost History
Original APB APB as of January 2006 Revised Original APB Prior APB Current APB Prior Annual SAR Current Estimate
Date MAR 2012 N/A N/A N/A MAR 2012 DEC 2010 DEC 2011
BY2012 $M PAUC APUC 21.981 17.328 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 21.981 17.328 N/A N/A 21.989 17.328
TY $M PAUC APUC 25.979 21.708 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 25.979 21.708 N/A N/A 25.990 21.708
SAR Unit Cost History
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M) Initial PAUC Dev Est 13.485 Changes Eng Est 0.840 6.614 PAUC Current Est 25.990
Econ -0.197
Qty 0.661
Sch 2.728
Oth 0.000
Spt 1.859
Total 12.505
UNCLASSIFIED
65
F-35
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M) Initial APUC Dev Est 11.548 Changes Eng Est 0.595 5.578 APUC Current Est 21.708
Econ -0.321
Qty 0.327
Sch 2.112
Oth 0.000
Spt 1.869
Total 10.160
SAR Baseline History SAR Planning Estimate (PE) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SAR Development Estimate (DE) N/A N/A N/A N/A 38648.3 2852 13.551 SAR Production Estimate (PdE) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current Estimate N/A N/A N/A N/A 63856.6 2457 25.990
Item/Event Milestone A Milestone B Milestone C IOC Total Cost (TY $M) Total Quantity Prog. Acq. Unit Cost (PAUC)
UNCLASSIFIED
66
F-35
Cost Variance F-35 Aircraft Cost Variance Summary

Summary Then Year $M RDT&E Proc 28685.7 163666.0 +825.1 +126.2 +6325.0 +2510.5 +5264.5 --+15051.3 -366.4 ---+1039.5 --+673.1 +15724.4 44410.1 44410.1 -7613.7 -21509.5 +22872.4 +7961.1 +93896.9 -+17614.3 +113221.5 +3668.6 -+5254.8 -+6035.5 --9198.6 +5760.3 +118981.8 282647.8 282647.8
SAR Baseline (Dev Est) Previous Changes Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Subtotal Current Changes Economic Quantity Schedule Engineering Estimating Other Support Subtotal Total Changes CE - Cost Variance CE - Cost & Funding
MILCON 2000.0 -4.9 --+252.8 -1696.7 ---1448.8 ----+4246.1 --+4246.1 +2797.3 4797.3 4797.3
Total 194351.7 -6793.5 -21383.3 +29197.4 +10724.4 +97464.7 -+17614.3 +126824.0 +3302.2 -+5254.8 -+11321.1 --9198.6 +10679.5 +137503.5 331855.2 331855.2
UNCLASSIFIED
67
F-35
Summary Base Year 2012 $M RDT&E Proc 32488.7 144179.9 -+126.7 +6577.3 +2730.7 +4947.4 --+14382.1 ----+1111.3 --+1111.3 +15493.4 47982.1 47982.1 --16581.9 +2059.0 +6780.9 +76795.6 -+15043.7 +84097.3 ----+4231.5 --8175.8 -3944.3 +80153.0 224332.9 224332.9
MILCON 1810.1 ---+274.3 -1532.5 ---1258.2 ----+3616.1 --+3616.1 +2357.9 4168.0 4168.0
Total 178478.7 --16455.2 +8636.3 +9785.9 +80210.5 -+15043.7 +97221.2 ----+8958.9 --8175.8 +783.1 +98004.3 276483.0 276483.0
Previous Estimate: September 2011 Cost Variance Memo The allocation of spares between aircraft and engine was not consistent from SAR-10 to SAR-11. The allocation will be consistent in SAR 12. Using consistent allocation results in the following SAR-11 values: Aircraft DoN spares increased by ~$850M; Aircraft USAF spares reduced by ~$2B Engine DoN spares increased by ~$90M; Engine USAF spares reduced by ~$200M.
UNCLASSIFIED
68
F-35
RDT&E Current Change Explanations Revised escalation indices. (Economic) Increase due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Navy). (Estimating) Increase due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Air Force). (Estimating) Increase due to incorporating International Partner Transfer funds associated with Partially Common Follow-On Development. (Estimating) Decrease due to Department of Navy (DoN) re-alignment of program funding , Congressional Marks, and Actual Funding Investment (Navy). (Estimating) Decrease due to Air Force (AF) re-alignment of program funding , Congressional Marks, and Actual Funding Investment (Air Force). (Estimating) Refined estimate. (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) RDT&E Subtotal Procurement Current Change Explanations Revised escalation indices. (Economic) Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate and procurement completion extended two years to FY 2029 (Navy). (Schedule) Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate and procurement completion extended two years to FY 2037 (Air Force). (Schedule) Increase due to higher than forecast contractor labor hours (Air Force) (Estimating) Increase due to higher than forecast contractor labor hours (Navy) (Estimating) Increase due to revised, slower International procurement quantity profile (Air Force) (Estimating) Increase due to revised, slower International procurement quantity profile (Navy) (Estimating) Increase due to higher than expected material burdens placed on subcontractors by prime contractor (Air Force) (Estimating) Increase due to higher than expected material burdens placed on subcontractors by prime contractor (Navy) (Estimating) Decrease due to lower than forecast prime contractor settlement costs with subcontractors (Air Force) (Estimating) Decrease due to lower than forecast prime contractor settlement costs with subcontractors (Navy) (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Navy). (Support) Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Air Force). (Support) Decrease in Initial Spares due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Navy). (Support)
$M Base Then Year Year N/A -366.4 +541.6 +548.5 +424.7 +408.9 +318.4 -318.6 -272.6 +0.1 +417.7 +1111.3 $M Base Year N/A 0.0 0.0 +1511.7 +1284.4 +228.6 +360.8 +637.1 +612.6 -378.0 -54.3 +28.6 -1.9 -1264.6 Then Year +3668.6 +1261.9 +3992.9 +2310.6 +1710.9 +351.7 +480.9 +952.3 +816.2 -540.4 -72.7 +26.0 -2.3 -1265.9 +321.9 -328.5 -283.7 +0.1 +372.3 +673.1
-2208.7 -625.6
-2343.4 -594.7
UNCLASSIFIED
69
F-35
Decrease in Initial Spares due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Air Force). (Support) Procurement Subtotal MILCON Current Change Explanations Increase due to revised estimate of MILCON requirements (Navy). (Estimating) Increase due to revised estimate of MILCON requirements (Air Force). (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) MILCON Subtotal
-4075.0 -3944.3 $M Base Year +2000.1 +1615.5 +0.5 +3616.1
-4992.3 +5760.3
Then Year +2231.9 +2013.7 +0.5 +4246.1
UNCLASSIFIED
70
F-35
F-35 Engine Cost Variance Summary

Summary Then Year $M RDT&E Proc 5714.3 32934.0 +201.1 +30.8 +1541.9 +612.0 +2559.6 --+4945.4 +99.2 ---+64.8 --+164.0 +5109.4 10823.7 10823.7 -1389.4 -3925.4 +4174.1 +1452.9 +13343.3 -+967.9 +14623.4 +606.2 -+986.5 -+283.9 -+3598.9 +5475.5 +20098.9 53032.9 53032.9
MILCON ---------------------
Total 38648.3 -1188.3 -3894.6 +5716.0 +2064.9 +15902.9 -+967.9 +19568.8 +705.4 -+986.5 -+348.7 -+3598.9 +5639.5 +25208.3 63856.6 63856.6
UNCLASSIFIED
71
F-35
Summary Base Year 2012 $M RDT&E Proc 6488.0 28741.5 -+30.9 +1603.5 +665.7 +2728.7 --+5028.8 ----+178.4 --+178.4 +5207.2 11695.2 11695.2 --3026.1 +375.8 +1237.5 +11163.4 -+826.4 +10577.0 ----+263.4 -+2751.0 +3014.4 +13591.4 42332.9 42332.9
MILCON ---------------------
Total 35229.5 --2995.2 +1979.3 +1903.2 +13892.1 -+826.4 +15605.8 ----+441.8 -+2751.0 +3192.8 +18798.6 54028.1 54028.1
Previous Estimate: September 2011 Cost Variance Memo The allocation of spares between aircraft and engine was not consistent from SAR-10 to SAR-11. The allocation will be consistent in SAR 12. Using consistent allocation results in the following SAR-11 values: Aircraft DoN spares increased by ~$850M; Aircraft USAF spares reduced by ~$2B Engine DoN spares increased by ~$90M; Engine USAF spares reduced by ~$200M.
UNCLASSIFIED
72
F-35
RDT&E Current Change Explanations Revised escalation indices. (Economic) Increase due to revised estimate of required risk funding based (Navy). (Estimating) Increase due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Air Force). (Estimating) Decrease due to Department of Navy (DoN) re-alignment of program funding , Congressional Marks, and Actual Funding Investment (Navy). (Estimating) Decrease due to DoN re-alignment of program funding , Congressional Marks, and Actual Funding Investment (Air Force). (Estimating) Increase due to incorporating International Partner Transfer funds associated with Partially Common Follow-On Development. (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) RDT&E Subtotal Procurement Current Change Explanations Revised escalation indices. (Economic) Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate and procurement completion extended two years to FY 2029 (Navy). (Schedule) Increase for revised DoD procurement profile (i.e. lower near-term ramp rate and procurement completion extended two years to FY 2037 (Air Force). (Schedule) Decrease due to incorporation of latest actual costs from early LRIP lots (Air Force). (Estimating) Decrease due to incorporation of latest actual costs from early LRIP lots (Navy). (Estimating) Increase due allocating non-recurring costs such as tooling, modifications, and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) to the engine previously booked against the total aircraft (Air Force). (Estimating) Increase due allocating non-recurring costs such as tooling, modifications, and Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) to the engine previously booked against the total aircraft (Navy). (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Air Force). (Support) Decrease in Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Navy). (Support) Increase in Initial Spares due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Air Force). (Support) Increase in Initial Spares due to revised estimate of required risk funding (Navy). (Support) Procurement Subtotal
$M Base Then Year Year N/A +99.2 +346.3 +324.7 +265.1 +238.7 -253.1 -186.3 +58.5 -52.1 +178.4 -271.4 -200.4 +29.2 -56.0 +164.0
$M Base Then Year Year N/A +606.2 0.0 0.0 -558.8 -383.4 +537.5 +234.8 +751.7 -683.6 -438.4 +580.3
+661.6 +6.5 -0.2 -245.3
+819.6 +6.0 -0.1 -260.1
-140.5 +1902.3 +1234.7 +3014.4
-140.4 +2514.6 +1484.9 +5475.5
UNCLASSIFIED
73
F-35
Contracts
Appropriation: RDT&E Contract Name Contractor Contractor Location Contract Number, Type Award Date Definitization Date Initial Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 18981.9 N/A 14
JSF Air System SDD Lockheed Martin Fort Worth, TX 76101 N00019-02-C-3002, CPAF October 26, 2001 October 26, 2001 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 27430.5 N/A 14 Cost Variance -219.7 -998.8 +779.1 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 31190.5 31762.7 Schedule Variance -113.4 -391.5 +278.1
Variance Cumulative Variances To Date (12/25/2011) Previous Cumulative Variances Net Change
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to formal approval and implementation of an Over Target Baseline (OTB) during 2011. The OTB was based on the 2010 Technical Baseline Review (TBR) which was performed to assess the schedule and funding necessary to complete the work of planned scope, additional effort required to de-risk the balance of SDD, and funding necessary to maintain an appropriate level of management reserve. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to formal approval and implementation of an Over Target Baseline (OTB) during 2011. The OTB was based on the 2010 Technical Baseline Review. Contract Comments The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to schedule extensions and cost overruns associated with the approved program restructure that were executed in 2005 and 2009, both of which incorporated OTBs. In addition, the contract price has also been impacted by the execution of contract modifications that adjusted tasks, estimated cost and available fee; and the removal of unearned award fee. The contract price increased since award primarily due to schedule extensions and cost overruns associated with the approved program restructures that were executed in 2005 and 2009, both of which incorporated OTBs. The Estimated Price at Completion reflects the revised program schedule and content following the TBR that was conducted in 2010. The TBR recommendations are the basis of a program replan which will result in implementation of an OTB and an OTS in 2012. A Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) and Review (IBR) were conducted in the fourth quarter of CY 2011. The Estimated Price at Completion may be adjusted as impacts of the program restructure and TBR are finalized.
UNCLASSIFIED
74
F-35
JSF Propulsion F135 SDD Pratt and Whitney East Hartford, CT 06108 N00019-02-C-3003, CPAF October 26, 2001 October 26, 2001 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 6807.5 N/A 30 Cost Variance -19.6 -77.2 +57.6 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 7664.6 8334.8 Schedule Variance -13.6 -50.5 +36.9
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to over-target baseline (OTB); driven primarily by unsatisfactory performance in the Rolls Royce Lift Fan, Rolls Royce Industrial Management, Nozzle and the Engine Fan. Both overtarget schedule (OTS) and OTB variances were reset to zero; the cost variance amount reset was $116.97M. Since OTB, cumulative cost variance degraded primarily due to unfavorable 2010 and 2011 General and Administrative rate adjustments totaling $13.5M and unfavorable performance of $6.1M in the Engine Fan. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to OTS driven primarily by unsatisfactory performance in the Rolls Royce Lift Fan, Rolls Royce Industrial Management, Nozzle and the Engine Fan. OTS variances were reset to zero and the schedule variance amount reset was $49.34M. Since OTS, cumulative schedule variance degraded due primarily to schedule delays in the Rolls Royce Lift Fan, Rolls Royce 3 Bearing Swivel Module and Turbine Exhaust Case components. Contract Comments This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract. The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to a combination of the following actions: modifications adding workscope and associated cost and fee increases, providing over target costs in 2009, and decreases in fee to remove unearned award fee. Specific actions added in 2011 include Partner Safety Case, Alternate Fuel Study, Low Observable Health Assessment System integration, procurement of one additional spare CTOL and STOVL spare engine authorized by the Technical Baseline Review (TBR) and execution of a Undefinitized Contract Action to allow 16 time-critical tasks to be started per the TBR. The contract price increased since award primarily due to schedule extension and added scope in accordance with the approved program restructure that was definitized in 2005, as well as, funding for affordability tasks. The Estimated Price at Completion reflects the revised program schedule and contentfollowing the TBR conducted in 2010. The TBR recommendations are thebasis of the program restructure which will result in implementation of an OTB and OTS in 2012. The Program Manager's Estimate at Completion is currently being re-assessed and will be updated after the Integrated Baseline Review scheduled for May 2012.
UNCLASSIFIED
75
F-35
JSF Propulsion F136 SDD GE/Rolls-Royce Cincinnati, OH 45215 N00019-04-C-0093, CPAF August 19, 2005 August 19, 2005 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 2418.9 N/A 6 Cost Variance -142.4 -140.5 -1.9 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 3055.3 2433.7 Schedule Variance -46.4 -47.0 +0.6
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to higher costs than planned in the Rolls Royce Lift Fan, Rolls Royce 3 Bearing Swivel Module, Nozzle and Rolls Royce Industrial Engineering support. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the recovery of prior months schedule. Contract Comments The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to contract termination. This is the final report for this contract. On April 25, 2011, a notice of termination for convenience was issued by the F-35 Primary Contracting Officer (PCO) to the General Electric/Rolls Royce Fighter Engine Team, Limited Liability Company on the F136 System Development and Demonstration contract.
UNCLASSIFIED
76
F-35
Appropriation: Procurement Contract Name Contractor Contractor Location Contract Number, Type Award Date Definitization Date Initial Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 2208.0 N/A 12
JSF Air System LRIP 2 Lockheed Martin Fort Worth, TX 76101 N00019-07-C-0097, CPIF/CPAF July 27, 2007 May 08, 2008 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 2619.9 N/A 12 Cost Variance -251.0 -250.9 -0.1 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 2546.8 2594.8 Schedule Variance -18.0 -130.1 +112.1
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to higher than planned airframe related efforts: wing out-ofstation work, rework and delays in assembly. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the Over Target Schedule which incorporated the replanned schedule in May 2011 and due to the completion of Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) 2 Conventional Takeoff and Landing aircraft during this period. Contract Comments This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract. The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to addition of Diminishing Manufacturing Sources scope as well as added scope from the LRIP 2 modifications.
UNCLASSIFIED
77
F-35
JSF Propulsion F135 LRIP 2 Pratt & Whitney East Hartford, CT 06108 N00019-07-C-0098, CPAF/CPIF August 24, 2007 August 23, 2008 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 547.7 N/A 16 Cost Variance -63.8 -36.7 -27.1 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 526.4 554.9 Schedule Variance -9.0 -29.8 +20.8
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to higher costs than planned in the Rolls Royce Lift Fan, Rolls Royce 3 Bearing Swivel Module, Nozzle and Rolls Royce Industrial Engineering support. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the recovery of prior months schedule. Contract Comments This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract. The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to a combination of the following actions: modifications adding workscope and associated cost and fee increases and decreases in fee to remove unearned award fee. Specific actions added in 2011 include Laser Measurement and providing over target cost funding of $36.1M. The contract price has increased since the initial award due to the exercise of the Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing variant Option (established to meet the "fly before you buy" requirement), the exercise of the proposal preparation option and the additional spare fan Follow-On Development kit procurement. The estimated price at completion contains the identified contract price changes as well as activities costing more than originally planned, rate changes and the estimated cost of future risks.
UNCLASSIFIED
78
F-35
JSF Air System LRIP 3 Lockheed Martin Fort Worth, TX 76101 N00019-08-C-0028, CPIF/CPAF May 14, 2008 June 02, 2009 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 2781.8 N/A 17 Cost Variance -315.0 -163.5 -151.5 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 3464.5 3602.4 Schedule Variance -65.0 -136.5 +71.5
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to higher than planned airframe-related efforts. Drivers include wing material as a result of increased Bill of Materials (BOM) due to supplier settlements, scrap, and material allocations and wing labor due to overtime required for out-of-station work and workarounds. Additional drivers include Recurring Manufacturing Support and recurring engineering support as well as Low Rate Initial Production 5 (LRIP) proposal prep activities and the impacts of foreign exchange rates. Unfavorable performance is also due to earlier part shortages in mate and rework parts in vehicle systems. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the Over Target Schedule restructure effort. Contract Comments The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to proposal prep over-target costs, and the Government share of over-target costs
UNCLASSIFIED
79
F-35
Propulsion JSF F135 LRIP 3 Pratt and Whitney East Hartford, CT 06108 N00019-08-C-0033, CPIF/CPAF August 02, 2008 July 15, 2009 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 699.3 N/A 21 Cost Variance -44.4 -11.8 -32.6 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 725.5 739.6 Schedule Variance -28.7 -108.3 +79.6
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to higher costs than planned in the Rolls Royce Lift Fan, Engine Assembly, Rolls Royce Industrial Engineering support. The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the recovery of prior months schedule. Contract Comments This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract. The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to a combination of the following actions: modifications adding workscope, associated cost & fee increases and decreases in fee to remove unearned award fee. Specific actions added in 2011 include Laser Measurement and providing over target cost funding of $34.1M. The contract price increased since award due to exercise of Tooling Option and procurement of additional Conventional Takeoff and Landing spare parts. The Estimated Price at Completion reflects the identified contract price changes as well as activities costing more than originally planned, rate changes and the estimated cost of future risks.
UNCLASSIFIED
80
F-35
Appropriation: Procurement Contract Name Contractor Contractor Location Contract Number, Type Award Date Definitization Date Initial Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 3783.1 4026.4 31
JSF Air System LRIP 4 Lockheed Martin Ft. Worth, TX 76101 N00019-09-C-0010, FPIF March 11, 2009 November 19, 2010 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 3899.2 4273.5 32 Cost Variance -131.4 0.0 -131.4 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 4925.6 5003.3 Schedule Variance -130.6 0.0 -130.6
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to early part shortages driving Out-of-Station inefficiencies, quality issues driving repair/rework and an increase in overtime spending to mitigate future schedule impacts. In addition, Wing inefficiencies continue to drive higher than anticipated costs for Recurring Manufacturing and Recurring Engineering Support labor. The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to production delays for supplier BAE due to unreliable tooling availability, quality issues driving repair/rework and late part deliveries. In addition, Wing-related assembly delays are driving Schedule Variances for subsystem material that cannot be issued to the aircraft as originally planned. Contract Comments The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to exercising options to purchase a Netherlands CTOL aircraft and Anciliary Mission Equipment/Pilot Flight Equipment for The Netherlands.
UNCLASSIFIED
81
F-35
JSF Propulsion F135 LRIP 4 Pratt and Whitney East Hartford, CT 06108 N00019-09-C-0015, CPIF/FPIF August 02, 2008 July 15, 2009 Current Contract Price ($M) Target Ceiling Qty 1154.2 N/A 32 Cost Variance -26.5 --26.5 Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Contractor Program Manager 1178.8 1154.2 Schedule Variance -118.1 --118.1
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable cumulative cost variance is due to the Rolls Royce Lift fan, Materials Management Services, Low Pressure Turbine and Turbine Exhaust Case and Augmentor module. The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to delays in Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) 3 that carried over into LRIP 4. Contract Comments The difference between the initial contract price target and the current contract price target is due to definitization of the contract that was the initial contract price, the execution of The Netherlands option for one Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) propulsion system and adding a requirement for engine and lift system laser measurement effort. This is the first time this contract is being reported.
UNCLASSIFIED
82
F-35
Deliveries and Expenditures F-35 Aircraft

Deliveries To Date Development Production Total Program Quantities Delivered Plan To Date 14 17 31 Actual To Date 14 11 25 Total Quantity 14 2443 2457 Percent Delivered 100.00% 0.45% 1.02%
Total Acquisition Cost Expenditures To Date Percent Expended Total Funding Years
Expenditures and Appropriations (TY $M) 331855.2 Years Appropriated 43202.1 Percent Years Appropriated 13.02% Appropriated to Date 44 Percent Appropriated
19 43.18% 62482.0 18.83%
F-35 Engine
Deliveries To Date Development Production Total Program Quantities Delivered Plan To Date 14 17 31 Actual To Date 14 11 25 Total Quantity 14 2443 2457 Percent Delivered 100.00% 0.45% 1.02%
Total Acquisition Cost Expenditures To Date Percent Expended Total Funding Years
Expenditures and Appropriations (TY $M) 63856.6 Years Appropriated 12033.6 Percent Years Appropriated 18.84% Appropriated to Date 44 Percent Appropriated
19 43.18% 13377.2 20.95%
As part of the development program restructure, the Secretary of Defense directed that one production aircraft (CF5) be used as an additional flight test asset to ensure the program had the additional capacity necessary to handle Carrier Variant testing. Although the purchase was made via the LRIP 4 contract, the aircraft is considered an RDT&E-funded SDD asset.
UNCLASSIFIED
83
F-35
Operating and Support Cost F-35 Aircraft

Assumptions And Ground Rules The Department's Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation (CAPE) office updated its Operating and Support (O&S) cost estimate for the Milestone B DAB review held in February 2012. The F-35 family of aircraft variants will replace or augment five current aircraft: F-16C/D, F-15C/D, A-10, F/A-18C/D, and AV-8B. The F-35 O&S estimate is based on legacy fleet history when F-35 specific data is not available. F-35 O&S costs shown in comparison with actual costs of an antecedent system reflect estimated cost-per-flyinghour for the F-35 Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) variant only. The CTOL variant will make up the majority of the F-35 aircraft DoD buy, 1,763 of the 2,443 total. The O&S differences between F-35 CTOL and F16C/D are representative of comparisons across legacy fleets. The F-16 costs have been developed in a joint effort with the Air Force Cost Analysis Agency and have been normalized to reflect the cost of fuel and annual number of flight hours in the F-35 estimate. The F-35 cost-per-flying-hour assumes full funding of the programs requirements; the F-16 cost-per-flying-hour reflects actual FY11 expenditures. Given the significant increase in capability, it is not unreasonable that the F-35 costs more to operate and sustain than certain legacy aircraft. Total O&S Cost ($ in Millions) below reflects total O&S costs for all three U.S. variants based on an estimated 30 year service life and predicted attrition and usage rates, and are not a simple extrapolation of CTOL costs shown in the upper table. The F-35 usage rates in terms of aircraft flight hours per year differ across variants as follows: CTOL @ 250, STOVL @ 302 and CV @ 316. The Total O&S Costs are adjusted for cost growth above inflation. A comparable number for antecedent systems is not available. Costs BY2012 $K F-35 Aircraft Cost per Flying Hour ($) 8.434 7.830 8.729 3.508 3.422 0.000 0.000 31.923
Cost Element Unit-Level Manpower Unit Operations Maintenance Sustaining Support Continuing System Improvements Indirect Support Other Total Unitized Cost (Base Year 2012 $)
F-16C/D Cost per Flying Hour ($) 8.968 5.256 5.724 1.342 1.180 0.000 0.000 22.470
Total O&S Costs $M Base Year Then Year
F-35 Aircraft 617014.4 1113273.0
F-16C/D ---
UNCLASSIFIED
84
F-35
F-35 Engine
Assumptions And Ground Rules Costs BY2012 $K F-35 Engine ---------
Cost Element Unit-Level Manpower Unit Operations Maintenance Sustaining Support Continuing System Improvements Indirect Support Other Total Unitized Cost (Base Year 2012 $)
No Antecedent ---------
Total O&S Costs $M Base Year Then Year
F-35 Engine ---
No Antecedent ---
Operating and Support (O&S) costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Air System subprogram.
UNCLASSIFIED
85

US - Joint Strike Fighter Selected Acquisition Report (F-35 - SAR - 31 DEC 2011)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

US - Joint Strike Fighter Selected Acquisition Report (F-35 - SAR - 31 DEC 2011)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval (DAMIR)

December 31, 2011 SAR

December 31, 2011 SAR

Phone Fax DSN Phone DSN Fax

703-601-5504 703-602-7649 329-5504 --

Date Assigned May 1, 2010

References F-35 Aircraft

December 31, 2011 SAR

Mission and Description

December 31, 2011 SAR

December 31, 2011 SAR

December 31, 2011 SAR

December 31, 2011 SAR

December 31, 2011 SAR

F-35 Aircraft Milestones

(Ch-1) (Ch-2) (Ch-2) (Ch-3) (Ch-2) (Ch-4)

December 31, 2011 SAR

F-35 Engine Milestones

SAR Baseline Dev Est N/A

Current APB Development Objective/Threshold N/A N/A

Current Estimate N/A

December 31, 2011 SAR

STOVL Mission Performance - STO Distance Flat Deck

690 550 730

TBD TBD TBD

584 469 615

December 31, 2011 SAR

CV Variant Internal Weapons Carriage - CTOL Variant

Internal Weapons Carriage - STOVL Variant

Internal Weapons Carriage - CV Variant

Radio Frequency (RF) Signature Logistic Footprint CTOL Variant

Logistic Footprint STOVL Variant

Logistic Footprint -CV Variant

Sortie Generation Rate - CTOL Variant

December 31, 2011 SAR

Sortie Generation Rate - CV Variant

Sortie Generation Rate - STOVL Variant

100% of all N/A top level IERs

98% for all variants at ASD's listed in Table 13

CV Recovery Performance, Approach Speed

Max approach speed (Vpa) at RCLW of less than 140 kts

Force Protection - All Variants

Net Ready (NR) - All

See Classified Annex in the ORD 100% of all

See Classified Annex in the ORD 100% of

December 31, 2011 SAR

Survivability - All Variants

N/A N/A N/A N/A

TBD TBD TBD TBD

Logistics Footprint - CV N/A Variant

Logistics Footprint STOVL Variant

N/A N/A N/A

TBD TBD TBD

December 31, 2011 SAR

less than 140 knots.

SAR Baseline Dev Est N/A

Change Explanations None

December 31, 2011 SAR

Track To Budget F-35 Aircraft

(Air Force) (Sunk)

December 31, 2011 SAR

(Navy) (Shared) (Navy) (Shared) (Air Force) (Shared) (Air Force)