Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineering Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct
article info a b s t r a c t
Article history: This paper presents an analysis of framework structures with semi-rigid joints. The semi-rigid end-plate
Received 18 January 2008 bolted joints are subjected to bending and tension or a compression axial force. Usually the influence of
Received in revised form an axial force on joint rotational stiffness is neglected. In some cases, the level of axial forces in the joints
11 April 2008
of structures can be significant and has a profound influence on characteristics of semi-rigid joints. One
Accepted 21 April 2008
Available online 29 May 2008
of the most popular practical methods permitting the determination of rotational stiffness and moment
resistance of a joint is the so-called component method. The extension of the component method for
Keywords:
evaluating the influence of bending moment and axial force on the rotational stiffness and moment
Steel semi-rigid joints resistance of a joint and an application to the analysis of framework structures are presented in the paper.
Knee joints The numerical results of calculations of steel frameworks are presented in this paper as well. The study
Bending moment shows that the estimation of axial force influence to rotation stiffness characteristics of the joint has
Axial force significant influence on the distribution of internal forces and displacements of steel framework.
Component method © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Joints’ characteristics
Steel frameworks analysis
Fig. 1. Semi-rigid end-plate joints: (a) column-to-beam knee joint; (b) beam-to-beam knee joint; (c) beam-to-beam joint.
Fig. 2. Loading schemes and mechanical models of joint: (a) beam-to-beam knee
joint with positive direction of internal forces; (b) upper part of joint in tension and
lower part in compression; (c) both sides of joint in compression; (d) both sides of
joint in tension.
The initial rotational stiffness of the joint for this case of loading
is expressed by:
M M(zt + zt0 )
Sj,ini = = P . (8)
Φ ∆t,max,eq − ∆t,min,i
The above presented procedure for stiffness calculation is only
applicable in the case where the behavior of the structure is elastic.
The moment resistance of the joint loaded by bending and axial
forces can be expressed as a function of axial force (the force that Fig. 3. Flowchart of framework analysis with semi-rigid joints under bending and
is perpendicular to end-plate) and resistance of the components. axial forces.
When one part of the joint is under tension and the other one is
under compression force Fig. 2(b), the moment resistance can be 3. Analysis of steel frames with semi-rigid joints including
expressed by the formula: influence of bending moments and axial forces
(Ft,r,Rd · hr ) − (N · cos α ± V · sin α) · zc
(X )
Mj,Rd = min (9)
Fc,i,Rd · zeq + (N · cos α ± V · sin α) · zt In this chapter, the procedure for calculation of steel frames
where hr — distance from bolt row r to the centre of compression; with semi-rigid joints suggested by the authors is presented. This
P
— indicate the sum according to r, where r is the number of bolt procedure can be used as part of an iterative design process for
rows in tension part of joint. steel frames. The calculation of steel frames according to this
When both sides of the joint are under compression forces procedure can be performed with the software used in steelwork
Fig. 2(c), the moment resistance can be expressed by the formula: design. The evaluation of the rotational stiffness of joints is the
Mj,Rd = zc (2Fc,max,i,Rd + (N · cos α ± V · sin α)) . (10) minimum requirement for the software to be used.
When the influence of bending moment and axial forces is
When both sides of the joint are in tension forces Fig. 2(d), the
moment resistance can be expressed by the formula: taken into account the characteristics of joint and magnitude
nX of acting forces are interdependent. In this case characteristics
Mj,Rd = min (Ft,max,r,Rd (hr − zc + zt0 )) − (N · cos α ± V · sin α) of joints as well as frame forces and displacements have to be
o calculated by an iterative procedure until the changes of joint
× zt0 (N · cos α ± V · sin α) · zt − Ft,min,i,Rd (zt + zt0 ) . (11)
characteristics and forces in structure between two iterations
where Ft,max,r,Rd —effective tension resistance of bolt row r in become very small (Fig. 3). When the influence of the axial
tension part of the joint, where the maximal tension force is acting; forces is disregarded, then no iteration procedure is needed for
Ft,min,i,Rd —resistance of the weakest component i in tension part of determination of characteristics of the joints and internal forces of
the joint, where the minimal tension force is acting. the frame.
A. Daniūnas, K. Urbonas / Engineering Structures 30 (2008) 3114–3118 3117
Fig. 5. Horizontal displacement of joint “A” of the left column (Fig. 4) when the
influence of axial forces is taken into account (M + N) and disregarded (only M).
4. Numerical examples
Table 1
The initial stiffness SA,ini (joint “A”) and SB,ini (joint “B”) (Fig. 4) with the different thickness of end-plate and angle of inclination α (in brackets is given initial stiffness, when
axial force is disregarded)
Initial stiffness (kNm/rad) Thickness of the end-plate (mm)
26 20 16 12
α = 0◦
SA,ini 238 000 (215 000) 170 700 (153 700) 114 000 (102 800) 59 000 (53 200)
SB,ini 96 700 (88 900) 69 300 (63 700) 46 350 (42 600) 24 000 (22 000)
α = 15◦
SA,ini 192 000 (161 000) 138 000 (116 000) 92 600 (77 500) 48 240 (40 150)
SB,ini 112 800 (97 400) 80 830 (69 800) 54 040 (46 700) 28 040 (24 200)
α = 30◦
SA,ini 164 700 (130 000) 119 000 (93 000) 79 740 (62 000) 42 175 (32 000)
SB,ini 176 960 (130 000) 126 800 (93 000) 84 300 (62 000) 42 610 (32 000)
α = 45◦
SA,ini 152 000 (110 000) 111 348 (78 600) 75 160 (52 500) 40 150 (27 200)
SB,ini 4500 000 (215 000) 3200 000 (153 700) 2200 000 (102 800) 1300 000 (53 200)
Table 2
The initial stiffness SA,ini of joint ‘A’ and vertical displacements uv of joint ‘A’ and point ‘B’ (Fig. 7) with the different thickness of end-plates in joint ‘A’
5. Conclusions [4] Goto Y, Miyashita S. Classification system for rigid and semirigid connections.
J Struct Eng 1998;124:750–7.
[5] van Keulen DC, Nethercot DA, Snijder HH, Bakker MCM. Frames analysis
In the article, the suggested extension of the well-known incorporating semi-rigid joint action: Applicability of the half initial Secant
component method for estimation of the total influence of axial stiffness approach. J Construct Steel Res 2003;59:1083–100.
force and bending moment allows one to obtain more accurate [6] Chen WF, Goto Y, Liew JYR. Stability design of semi-rigid frames. John Wiley &
Sons; 1996.
stiffness and moment resistance characteristics of the various
[7] Eurocode 3, EN 1993-1-8. Design of steel structures—Part 1–8: Design of joints,
joints. The performed investigations have shown that axial force CEN Brussels. Belgium: 2005.
influences the rotational stiffness and moment resistance of the [8] de Lima LRO, da Silva LS, da S Vellasco PCG, de Andrade SAL. Experimental
joints. Tension axial force decreases the rotational stiffness of the analysis of extended end-plate beam-to-column joints under bending and
axial force. Eurosteel, Coimbra 2002;1121–30.
joints and compression axial force increases it. Analysis of steel [9] Cerfontaine F, Jaspart JP. Analytical study of the interaction between bending
frameworks has shown that calculation results differ when total and axial force in bolted joints. Eurosteel, Coimbra 2002;997–1006.
influence of bending moment and axial force on characteristics [10] Sokol Z, Wald F, Delabre V, Muzeau JP, Švarc M. Design of end plate joints
subject to moment and normal force. Eurosteel, Coimbra 2002;1219–28.
of the joints was estimated and when only influence of bending [11] Jaspart JP, Weynand K. Extension of the component method to joints in
moment on characteristics of the joint was estimated. tubular construction. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium
Suggested simple iterative procedure for the analysis of and Euroconference on tubular structures. Düsseldorf: 2001. p. 517–23.
[12] Ashraf M, Nethercot DA, Ahmed B. Sway of semi-rigid steel frames, part 2:
framed structures with semi-rigid joints with estimation bending
Irregular frames. Eng Struct 2007;29:1854–63.
moments and axial forces allow to use the framework analysis [13] Aristizabal-Ochoa JD. Large deflection and postbuckling behavior of Timo-
software, which enable to evaluate only rotational stiffness of the shenko beam–columns with semi-rigid connections including shear and axial
joints. effects. Eng Struct 2007;29:991–1003.
[14] Djebbar N, Chikh N-E. Limit period based on approximate analytical
Therefore, joints in which significant axial forces occur have to methods estimating inelastic displacement demands of buildings. J Civil Eng
be designed by estimating the total influence of bending moment Management 2007;13:283–9.
and axial force. [15] Gizejowski MA, Barszcz AM, Branicki CJ, Uzoegbo HC. Review of analysis
methods for inelastic design of steel semi-continuous frames. J Construct Steel
Res 2006;62:81–92.
References [16] Weynand K, Jaspart JP, Steenhuis M. The Stiffness Model of revised Annex J of
Eurocode 3. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on connections
[1] Hasan R, Kishi N, Chen WF. A new nonlinear connections classification system. in steel structures behavior, strength and design. Trento: 1995. p. 441–52.
J Construct Steel Res 1998;47:119–40. [17] Urbonas K, Daniūnas A. Component method extension to steel beam-to-beam
[2] Jaspart JP. General report: Session on connections. J Construct Steel Res 2000; and beam-to-column knee joints under bending and axial forces. J Civil Eng
55:69–89. Management 2005;XI(3):217–24. Vilnius: Technika.
[3] Faella C, Piluso V, Rizzano G. Structural steel semirigid connections: Theory, [18] Urbonas K, Daniūnas A. Behaviour of semi-rigid beam-to-beam joints under
design and software. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC; 2000. bending and axial forces. J Construct Steel Res 2006;62:1244–9.