4/28/13 7:33 PM“Milt Shook Is A Documented Moron” | The Public RecordPage 2 of 12http://web.archive.org/web/20120804170452/http://pubrecord.org/commentary/10145/milt-shook-documented-moron/
Example #2Example #3Worst legal analyst in American history: milt shookMilt Shook, too dumb to understand simple legal issuesMilt Shook Desperately Denying That He Said What He Said..Milt Shook continues to support his sock puppet claims.the no talent loon, Milt Shook, has left the Usenet group
The word on the street is that Milt is now engaged in a desperate attempt to find and weed out the folks on the chatroom circuit who arelaughing about his loony behavior in usenet. Poor Milt thought he could keep his ignorant statements from popping up on the rest of theinternet.
Who is this Milt Shook person?
From what I gather is that he’s a paralegal aspiring to be a political pundit. One whose schtick is to bash the left endlessly on obscureforums.Why is he worth considering, especially considering the fact that I can read the same sort of crap here on DU everydayHe is insulting, and apparently clueless, and simply not worth listening to.
Re: # Milt Shook is up the First Amendment creek without a paddle… again
This one is priceless given his attack on Leopold’s report about a lawsuit filed against the CIA last week about:
Milt Shook continues to advertisehis ignorance of the law…. will he never learn?Milt Shook, internet moron and posuer, invents a law
No matter how many times I point out that every one of his cases supports MY argument and undermines HIS, he still doesn’t see it…
Milt Shook claiming that Bush could pardon OJ SimpsonMilt Shook’s greatest hits!
“Bush can pardon ANYONE for ANYTHING. The purpose of the pardon power
in the first place was so that the president would have the power to right a judicial wrong, even at the state level. Since probably at least 90% ormore of crime is prosecuted at the state level, it wouldn’t make sense to only give him the power to pardon federal crimes.” –Milt Shook claiming that Bush could pardon OJ Simpson.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/4f4fe748216d1e2e?hl=en
“In fact, being married actually CUTS
Social Security benefits for both.” –Milt Shook disagreeing with the social security peoplehttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/e76631f45f458651?hl=en
“It doesn’t matter if it’s state property or not; the state doesn’t
have to power to limit access to a public area. They can charge to access it, but they can’t force people to have a state ID card or something. It’sright in the 14th Amendment; if you allow one person to get in for free, then all people have to be allowed in for free, if it’s public property.” –Milt Shook.. more ignorance of the lawhttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/83e117a21b818c9b
“I’ve explained it to you before; it’s because the state is
obligated to protect your First Amendment rights, even from private parties. ” –Milt Shook claiming that private parties are subject to the First Amendmenthttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/49833dff86ea3447
“You cannot fire someone for something that
has nothing to do with their job.” –Milt Shook …wrong again…http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/c85065e97f69d9e0?hl=en
“And one of the ironies of this entire discussion is that a company
that pays corporate income taxes one year can deduct them as a business expense the next. –Milt Shook, Feb 4, 2008 who claims to have been a business consultant and have his own corporation.