scattered waves
are related via
%&
(2)Ifwewantto characterize amultiportwith
¡
portswe have to perform
¡
simulations and to computethe scattering from the input ports to the outputports. Usually we will excite only one port at eachsimulation, and each time we will excite anotherport. However, due to non-perfect termination of all ports each time all ports will be excited by in-cident waves. Let
&¡
,
&
£¢
, ...
&
¥¤
be the vectorsdescribing the excitation in the first, second and
¡§¦©¨
simulation, and let
¡
,
¢
, ...
¤
denominatethe vectors summarizing the scattered waves. Wethen may introduce the
¡¡
matrices
&¡
&
£¢
&
£¤"!
(3)
#
¡
$ ¢
¤"!
(4)A number of
¡
simulations is carried out, wherein the
%
–th simulation,(i = 1 ...N)a primarypulsewave
&('0)
is applied to the
%
–th port. The portsof the multiport are terminated with the reflectionfactors
1
¡
12¢
1(¤
. The waves flowing into themultiport are given by
436587
#
(5)with
7
@9%0&BA1
¡
C12¢
1(¤D!
. If
FE
¡
exists, thescattering matrix of the multiport can be obtainedfrom
%
#E
¡
(6)For this evaluation both,
and
#
have to be eval-uated. This procedure yields a deembedding of non–perfectly terminated multiports.III. E
XAMPLE
In this section, S-Parameters calculated by theconventional method according to (1) and thedembedding method after (6) are shown for a in-terdigital capacitor mapped in fig. 1. The inter-digital capacitor has got a size of 880
G
m
250
G
m and is manufactured by a thin film method ona ceramic substrate. The computed scattering pa-rameterresultshavebeen comparedwithmeasure-ments made by a HP-8510C network analyzer anda Cascade on-wafer prober.
500/100 nodes190/19 nodesplane of the calculated currents and voltages
12
measurement plane
190/19 nodes
measurement plane
1 0
220/22 nodes
1 0
85/17 nodes
Fig. 1. Interdigital capacitor with dimensions (in
H
m) andnumber of nodes
The simulation was performed using 5
G
m assmallestmesh sizeand 10
G
mas biggest. Thesim-ulation box has got a size of 880
G
m
305
G
m
335
G
m, whereas 240
G
m from the 335
G
m rep-resent the free space above the structure. A mag-netic wall can be used to half the simulation box.So computation resources and time can be saved.The path integrals for the voltages and currents arein the same cross-section defined as the measure-ment plane at every port of the interdigital capaci-tor. With this cell sizes the computation time took 5 hours on a HP-C360 workstation with 500MBmemory. The time includes the two device sim-ulations needed for all wave amplitudes, and thereference simulation needed for the characteristicimpedance of the microstrip-lines.Fig. 4 till Fig. 2 show the S-parameters
¢¡£¡
,
¢
¡
and
¢I¢
derived by the conventional method ac-cording to (1), the dembedding method after (6)and the measurement.In order to proof the deembedding technique,one simulation was computed with non-ideal
Fig. 2. Simulated and measured
PRQSQ
of the interdigital ca-pacitor
Leave a Comment