• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
<b><i>WHAT TYPE OF ORGANIZATION IS THIS? WHO PAYS THEM?? TAXPAYERS I BET.....IDON'T KNOW ABOUT THEM OR WHAT THEY DO....WHO ARE THEY WARNING OF WHAT....A PRIVATEFBI?? HUH?? THEY ARE IN ALL FUSION CENTER OPERATIONS!! CHECK MAIC...IT SEEMS THEYARE WARNING THE BOSS (WHOEVER THAT IS) OF A DANGER OF HIS UNDERLING OBAMA BEINGDEPRESIDENTIZED AND THE PROBLEMS THAT MAY CAUSE....</i></b>Lyle J. Rapacki, PHD, FBI InfraGard, March 16, 2009, White Paper Discussion, Dr.Orly Taitz, Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, Barack Obama not eligible, USAttorney General, US Army Officer, constitutional crisis, civil unrestMarch 25, 2009 · 551 Comments<a href="http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/lyle-j-rapacki-phd-fbi-infragard-march-16-2009-white-paper-discussion-dr-orly-taitz-supreme-court-justice-john-roberts-barack-obama-not-eligible-us-attorney-general-us-army-officer-consti/">http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/lyle-j-rapacki-phd-fbi-infragard-march-16-2009-white-paper-discussion-dr-orly-taitz-supreme-court-justice-john-roberts-barack-obama-not-eligible-us-attorney-general-us-army-officer-consti/</a>From Dr. Orly Taitz:“NOTE from Defend Our Freedoms Foundation Staff.The below report states: “if Mr Obama fights unsealing his documentation…therewill be civil unrest unleashed on the streets”InfraGrad has a Public Private Partnership with the FBI. The PPP programs has beenleveraged heavily from local to international levels to render entities back intoPanopolies. The term panopoly was coined by Joseph Borkin, chief economic advisorof the Anti-trust Division of the Department of Justice circa 1943, during hisinvestigations of I.G. Farben because the aggregation of businesses were muchlarger than a monopoly or cartel.LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.Consultant at Behavioral Analysis and Threat AssessmentVice President of Protective Services_______Diplomate: Reply:American Academy of Forensic Counselors Southwest Risk Advisors, Inc.American Psychotherapy Association Post Office Box 1595Chandler, Arizona 85244Licensed Investigator Telecommunications:Protective Intelligence Specialist and Agent 1-866-481-7712 – officeInformation Warfare Analyst 480-440-5930 – cellASIS – Phoenix Chapter Membership Chair LRapacki1@Hotmail.com
 
FBI InfraGard – ArizonaMemorandum: WHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIEDPROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09NOT CLASSIFIED — PUBLIC DISSEMINATIONMarch the 16th, 2009Statement of Purpose:The content of this White Paper is deliberately intended to stimulate thought anddiscussion. Informational analysis comprising global security, national securityof the United States of America, socio-political-economic forces as a dimension tonational security, culture, freedom in human rights, defense and the rule of laware considered within the framework of this treatise.Overview:Beginning as campaign rhetoric, the question of Barak Obama’s legal status as acitizen of the United States of America qualified to serve as President, is movingtoward a crescendo that might be heard formally by the United States SupremeCourt. Downplayed by many, including U.S. Senators on the Republican side and evenSenators serving on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee as late as Friday of lastweek, a significant meeting occurred last Thursday, March 12th in Idaho. The ChiefJustice of the U.S. Supreme Court was speaking before a large audience (800 inattendance, including the President of the Idaho State Bar Association) on thecharacter of Abraham Lincoln, when attorney Orly Taitz of Mission Viejo,California came to the microphone and asked the Chief Justice if he wouldpersonally review a legal brief and a complaint signed by over 325,000 Americancitizens as to the Constitutionality of Barak Obama’s swearing-in as President.Chief Justice Roberts personally agreed to review the legal brief and thecomplaint saying such in front of the audience.Motions to be heard on this critical Constitutional matter have been dismissedalready, or not even accepted by courts in many states – New Jersey, Pennsylvania,Ohio, Georgia, Washington, Texas, North Carolina to name a few. But the issue willnot go away; it is morphing nowto include active members of the Armed Forces serving in “Hot Zones” or theatresof combat. The legal motion handedWHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIEDPROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09March the 16th, 2009Continued – page twoto the Chief Justice warns: “If MR. OBAMA is not constitutionally eligible toserve as President of the United States, then no act that he takes is, arguably,valid, the laws that he signs would not be valid, the protective orders that hesigns would be null and void, and every act that he takes would be subject tolegal challenge, both in the Courts of the United States of America, and inInternational Courts, and that, therefore, it is important for the voters to knowwhether he, or any candidate for President in the future, is eligible to serve inthat office.”
 
Just prior to this meeting, attorney Taitz sent Certified Correspondence onFebruary 27th to the U.S. Attorney General, the Director of the FBI, Congressionaland Senatorial Judiciary Committee, et.al. with the stated purpose “demand forinvestigation and immediate action in regards suspected crimes” identified as, butnot limited to: impersonation of a military officer, libel, defamation ofcharacter, harassment, interference with judicial proceedings, breaking into thecomputer system of the Supreme Court of the United States, forgery, usingcyberspace for voter fraud. Military officers from all branches of the U.S. ArmedForces have joined in this action as Plaintiffs. Among the petitioners are: Maj.Gen. Carroll Childers; Lt. Col. Dr. David Earl-Graef; police officer and SelectedReservist Navy Commander Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, U.S. Army nowserving on active duty in Iraq; New Hampshire state Rep. Timothy Comerford; Tenn.State Rep. Frank Nicely and others.One of the “and others” is Harry Riley, a veteran who spent a significant timeserving in the Pentagon. This former officer said the issue is basically overwhether Americans will allow “the trashing” of their Constitution. “Myself, alongwith hundreds of thousands of other warriors, have fought for the U.S.Constitution. The whole issue is one of constitutional crisis. How can anindividual become the Commander-in-Chief, or the president of the U.S., withquestions regarding his constitutional qualifications?”The complaint filed with the U.S. Attorney General (now in the hands of the ChiefJustice of the U.S. Supreme Court) requests “relate Quo Warranto on Barack HusseinObama II to test his title to president before the Supreme Court.” This legalphrase essentially means an explanation is being demanded for what authority Obamais using to act as president. This is the only judicial remedy for violations ofthe Constitution by public officials and agents. This legal right established inBritish common law 800 years ago and was recognized by the U.S. Founding Fathersto demand documentation that may prove – or disprove – Barack Obama’s eligibilityto be president.The complaint further states: “As president-elect, Respondent Obama failed tosubmit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009.Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications.Relators submit that as president elect, Respondent Obama failed to qualify perU.S. Constitution; articles II and I; amendment XX paragraph 3.”What follows is the Summary of the complaint filed by Orly Taitz, attorney inMission Viejo, California. As you can imagine, the complaint is thorough and long.I have replicated sufficientWHITE PAPER DISCUSSION — NOT CLASSIFIEDPROTECTIVE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION PI: 126:09March the 16th, 2009Continued – page threepassages so not to diminish the nature, spirit, scope or details of the complaintbut conscious of time to read and length, I compiled the salient points in thiscomplaint to save you from reading the 78 page document. I will further attestthat Exhibits and articles of proof were also attached to the documents Ireviewed. I will further attest the investigator working this case for attorneyTaitz is a licensed Private Investigator in the State of California for the pasttwenty-five years, and prior to this, served twenty years as a Detective at New
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...