Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
David M. Zavala, A020 683 429 (BIA Apr. 30, 2012)

David M. Zavala, A020 683 429 (BIA Apr. 30, 2012)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 39 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) returned the case for further proceedings upon finding the Immigration Judge failed to meaningfully address the respondent's claim that he derived U.S. citizenship from his parents or grandparents. The decision was written by Member Charles Adkins-Blanch.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) returned the case for further proceedings upon finding the Immigration Judge failed to meaningfully address the respondent's claim that he derived U.S. citizenship from his parents or grandparents. The decision was written by Member Charles Adkins-Blanch.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on May 10, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
VALA, DAVID
M
{A020-683-429)15850 EXPORT PL DRIVEHOUSTON,
77032Name: ZAVALA, DAVID
MUS rm  
Executive Oce r Immigration Rview
B mmg ppOc  h Ck
5107 Lesburg l'ik, Suit 2000Fas Churc ii 2204 /
HS/CE Oice of Chief Counsel
HO126 Nohpoint Drive, Suite 2020Houston
77060A02068329Date of this notice: 4/30/202
nclosed is a copy of the Boar's decision an order in the above-rerenced case.ncosurePae Members:Akins-Banch, Chares
K.
SincereyDonna Carr Chie Cerk
Cite as: David M. Zavala, A020 683 429 (BIA Apr. 30, 2012)
 
.'
U.S.
Dpan of Justice
E
xecutiv
e
Oe r Imgraton RevewFas Ch,
Virginia
22041
Fle:A020 683 429 -Houston,
T
Deson of he Board o Imgraon Appeals
Date:
APR 30 212
In re:DAVD M ZAVALA a.ka. Davd Mn Zavala aka. Davd an Mora aka.Davd Zavala a.k.a. Marn Davd Zavaa aka Davd avaa a.ka Marn Davd Zavaa
I
RMOVAL PROCEDGSAPPALON BHALF OF RSPONDETro seThe respondent, a natve and ctzen of Mexco who was admtte to the Unte States as a lawpeanent resdent on or about July 3, 1977, appeals he decson of the mmgraton uge, datedJuary 24, 202, orderng hs reova o ths country The record wl be remaned.Werevew mraton Juges' ndns of ct r clear error, but questons ofaw, dscreton,and judgment, n all other ssues n appeals, e novo 8 CF.R §§ 1003(d)(3)(}, ()ven though the respondent was bo n Mexco n 966, he beleves that he may have a clamto Unte States ctzenshp. A person bo abroa who clams to be a citzen of the Unte Stateshasthe burden to esablsh such clams
2
See Matter ofLeya,
6 &N Dec. 18, 19 (BA 977);
 see also Matter ofodriez-Tejedor,
23 & Dec 53, 64 (BA 200)Bere the mmgraton Juge, the pro se respondent ned the mgraton Juge tat hsraparets were ctzes of te Uted States an that "t's your law book that says 8 SC.§ 1432 t says that  ca apply snce they rase e However, the mgraton Judge told terespondent that he dnt ask about your granparents because ts ot mporat to your case, tathe was not famlar th that law, and that the respondent woud get a chance to make thatargument to the Board (Tr at 121-22) n hs ecson, te mmraton Judge anayzed therespondents Unte States ctzenshp clam by smply statng that "the Cour does not share [therespondents] opnon (J at )Ase om the Unted States ctzenshp clam, the responent oes not dspute that he s subecttoremova om the Ute States as a resut of hs crmna hsto an does not allee that he sebe r y rmof ree o reova tt  be rae by  mmraon Jue or tBoar
The ctesp an atonay aws of ts coutr, wc are eneray un at Ttle  of themmraton an atonaty Act, are complex, numerous, an have chaned sgncantly over tmeAssuch, specc and thoroug ct nng s requred by an mmgraton Jue n order r hsBordto determe whc las are applcabe n ay ven matter cocen such cams
ee
8 CF.R § 003.1(d)(3)(v) (provng that, subject to cean exceptons not appcable to the present cse,the Boar w ot engae n ct-nng  te course of decg appeals).
Cite as: David M. Zavala, A020 683 429 (BIA Apr. 30, 2012)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->