Broadband is a crucial and enjoyable technology that everyone should haveaccess to. I laud President Obama’s Broadband Initiative to bring broadband tounderserved rural areas. This is quite clearly a massive undertaking and thetechnology used to implement this program will have long-term ramifications. It isimperative that the sustainability and the health impacts of this undertaking bethoroughly examined and considered in the choosing of the broadbandtechnology. Sustainability and Health must be given the highest status as part of the Selection Criteria for the program.For these reasons fiber optics is the most desirable technology to implement. Nextgeneration fiber optics uses less energy and will therefore contribute less CO2than other systems. In addition to the CO2 emissions from wirelesscommunications the RF radiation, which amplifies in crystalline structures, may bea factor in the rapid melting of Arctic and Antarctic ice and in warming of the icecrystals in our atmosphere.Fiber optics is also the clear choice for our Homeland Security needs. Fiber optics are not easily hacked into and they cause no RF interference with other communication systems. In addition they are mostly impervious to harm fromnuclear radiation and any potential solar electromagnetic interference.But, the clear reason as to why fiber optics should be used is that it will limit theamount of RF radiation the general population is exposed to. I was injured threeyears ago from chronic exposure to cellular antennas. I have been researchingthis issue extensively and I have found there is much scientific evidence, whichindicates that there are biological non-thermal effects from exposure to RFradiation. I have also networked with people from all over the world who have hadtheir health impacted by chronic RF radiation exposure. Many of these people,including myself, have had to quit our jobs and move from our homes in our effortto minimize our RF radiation exposure. I can attest from anecdotal evidence frommy networking that minimizing RF radiation exposure is the only way to lesson thesensitivity to RF radiation that occurs from chronic exposure. While there is agrowing population of people who have realized the source of their deterioratinghealth is due to RF radiation exposure there are potentially millions of people whoare being harmed without realizing the cause. Doctors worldwide are reportingincreases in new diseases. These increases have grown along with our growth of wireless communication antennas. Many countries in Europe and elsewhere havetaken measures to limit RF radiation exposure. Doctors and scientists have issuedwarnings, especially for pregnant women and children, to limit exposure.The U.S. must take steps to limit exposure to RF radiation. Our federal exposurestandards are outdated and only take into account thermal effects. The exposureharm is not limited to humans. Animals, birds, plants and even our climate areimpacted by the increase of RF radiation due to human wireless communications.In addition to wireless systems, Broadband over power lines will increase RFradiation exposure unless steps are taken to limit the antenna effect of our current
Commenting has been disabled.