SSO Name # Size % ELL % Sp E % Title I Asian Black HispanicWhite PR 07 PR 08 QR 07 QR 08Academy for Educational Development PS 7 447 19.4 22.6 63.4 3.1 39.4 55.4 1.3 66.7 62.6 0 60Center for Educational Innovation-PEA PS 71 636 11.6 16.5 53.8 11.2 30.7 42.8 14.4 56.5 57.4 34.3 65.2Community LSO 164 624 9.5 15.9 68.4 4.8 47.9 39.4 6.7 51.4 55.8 16.6 55.2CUNY School Success Network 13 421 7.8 10 56.7 8.6 42.4 42 6.2 53.2 63.5 30 61.5Empowerment Support Organization 511 605 12.4 14.3 57.8 9.5 34.3 42.7 12 55.9 60.4 39.5 64.7Fordham University PSO 10 533 21.9 13.3 68.7 5.8 31 55.3 6.5 52.2 51.3 22.2 60Integrated Curriculum and Instruction LS 363 864 12.5 14.3 54.1 20.3 24.5 34.2 19.8 54.4 58.8 46.6 63.6Knowledge LSO 97 748 6.9 14.6 70 8 52.4 29.6 8.6 48 51.3 29.9 68.1Leadership LSO 119 621 13.7 17.8 61.9 3.3 32.4 59.2 4 51.2 57.4 32.2 61.6New Visions for Public Schools PSO 75 457 9.9 11.7 54.9 5.4 42.3 44.2 4.8 58 58.3 23.7 44.6Replications, Inc. PSO 11 319 15.2 13.1 67.9 4.5 44.7 46.6 1.9 60.9 54.1 0 62.5
#: The number of schools that are members of the school support networkSize: The average number of students enrolled in the network's schools% ELL: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools who are considered English langugage learners% Sp Ed: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools who are entitled to special education services% TItle I: The proportion of students in the SSO's schools whose families are eligible for free or reduced lunchaccording to federal poverty guidelinesPR 07: The average raw score for the SSO's schools on their 2006-2007 progress reportsPR 08: The average raw score for the SSO's schools on their 2007-2008 progress reportsQR 07: The percentage of schools in the SSO that got a grade of "well developed" or "outstanding" on theirDOE Quality Review in the 2006-2007 school yearQR 08: The percentage of schools in the SSO that got a grade of "well developed" or "outstanding" on theirDOE Quality Review in the 2007-2008 school yearSatisfaction: The percentage of principals who reported being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the SSO% Change PR: The percentage change in the SSO's raw progress report score average from 2007 to 2008% Change QR: The percentage change in each SSO's proportion of schools that got the highest ratings ontheir Quality Reviews from 2007 to 2008
All data from the Department of Education's SSO profiles
Leave a Comment