energy without affecting their direction (the so-called "braking up" of light, which isobvious from the standpoint of common sense, but hard to accept within the framework of electro-dynamics).In our opinion, Tesla was aware of this problem, and that is the very reason why heinsisted that his invention was not based in "Hertzian" waves. In truth, he was both right,and he was not. As we shall see below, this only seems to be a contradiction. For,according to our Model, the Universe and all "objects" in it, where the Universe itself is just one of the "objects" inside the Unity, are beyond doubt multi-dimensional andenclosed in the "spacetimematter" sense, which is in complete accordance with theGeneral Relativity Theory. What we stress here is the fact that this enclosedness is alsoassumed for the so-called fourth dimension, which we usually call "time". According tothe Model (and Einstein's views) it is an INSEPARABLE and quite equal "part" of thespacetimematter whole. This interpretation of the structure of the Unity makes it possiblefor us to assume that the Earth not only deforms "space" by its mass (as Einstein's ideasare usually interpreted- in the gravitational sense), but it also deforms the entire multi-dimensional structure of the Unity, enclosing it in (at least) four dimensions!A description of the multi-dimensional structure of the Unity implied by the Modeldemands a lot of explanation, but for on this occasion let us say, in the most simplifiedmanner, that the fourth dimension (which is vertical to all three of "our already existingones") has the direction which can most approximately described by the words "from theinside out" (and the other way around). In analogy to the fact that "a man with a multi-dimensional sight could see the back of his own head", as Einstein joked on an occasion,explaining the enclosed quality of "space" (in the three-dimensional sense), according tothe Model, due to the enclosed quality of the fourth dimension, an electro-magneticimpulse sent "outwards" should return "inside", and thus, in the spatial sense, return tothe same "place" that it was sent from, but to another "place" in the multi-dimensionalsense, i.e. be "dislocated" in the fourth dimension, or, to put it in a simpler and to us morecomprehensible way, return after a certain time interval...Our subjective experience inside the (whether we admit it or not: three-dimensional +time) world is only a rough projection of a state-event from the multi-dimensionalobjective reality. That is the root of our problems in communication with Nature.Although the EOU Model is based on assumptions (as all other cosmological theories), itstill enables us to " catch a glimpse of" the unimaginable depths of the Unity, from theUniverse to human mind...In this concrete case, according to the Model, Tesla's non-Hertzian waves are in factHertzian waves after all (the only kind that exists), but they were moving "outside", thatis, on the other side from our "inside", where their "path" is much longer, and the delay istherefore incomparably longer than the one expected for the motion "inside". Withoutfurther explanations, we can say that the meaning of quantification has been "expanded"to the whole of the Unity (and thus to "time" as well), from which we get the formula T 2t = 10 –66 . To put it simply, in relations of something "that is", and that is "inside", as philosophers would term it, and something that is "outside", on the "other side" from our "inside", the terms of "path traveled" and "wavelength" are completely equivalent in thesame sense in which the energies of objects, expressed as mc 2 and h n are alsoequivalent, and moreover, according to the Model, are identical. Let us now try to explainTesla's experiment using the assumptions of the Model, where the terms of linear space
Add a Comment