Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
APFFC Newsletter 11 MAY 2013

APFFC Newsletter 11 MAY 2013

Ratings: (0)|Views: 315 |Likes:
Published by Toni Johnson
apffc newsletter May 2013 issue 11
apffc newsletter May 2013 issue 11

More info:

Published by: Toni Johnson on May 14, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





After the end of World War Twoin 1945, the United States devised a a plandesigned to help rebuild and reinvigoratethe infrastructure and economies of theallied nations that had been devastated bythe war. This plan, named after it'sarchitect George Marshall, would come to be known of as the Marshall Plan. Toaccomplish the goals of this plan asoutlined by Marshall, the Untied Stateswould commit nearly five percent of itsG.N.P. No one at that time thought thisendeavor to be a national or internationalhandout. Quite to the contrary, those menthat worked to formulate and implementthis plan would come to be known asvisionaries and forward thinkers. Thewell-reasoned consensus was that aninvestment in these economiesrepresented over time to an investment inAmerica. The wisdom of that decision isself-evident.Sixty some odd years later, rightin this country, indeed right outside mostof our doors, there exist urbancommunities, that have been devastated
AN URBAN MARSHALL PLAN: A hand up, not a hand out
 by the financial crosswinds that have buffeted this country. Houses under water,victims of predatory loans often tainted byracist policies are rampant. Unemployment,frequently hovering near or above fifteen percent has become par for the course.Dilapidated infrastructure, crumbling inner cities schools occur far more frequently thanshould ever be acceptable. Stores from whichto buy healthy fruits and vegetables arevirtually non-existent.
The people that live in thesecommunities’ voices are rarely if ever heardin the corridors of power. They control no"Super Pacs " or finance and high-poweredlobbyist. The recession that was/is a cold of sorts for the rest of the country was a fluvirus for them. In these communitiesmanufacturing jobs have long since beenshipped overseas and even customer service jobs have settled into the surroundingsuburbs. Is there any wonder that anunderground economy is pervasive in thesecommunities? If there is, there should not be.The people that live in these communities arenot lazy, laggard or simply desire to live of the dole. They are not asking for a hand out,theywhat it did for Europe in the past. Give them a hand up. In an era of "To big to fail " and massive financial bailouts for the well connected, theseare those that are left wanting. None of this is to say that therehave not been past attempts to addressthis concern (see Office of Urban Policyand Promise Neighborhoods). However,in each instance, be it as a result of  political gridlock or a loss of traction,the end results have been the same. The problem here is not intractable. Thehistory of this country is replete withexamples of what can be done, when thewill and the resolve is there. There arecountless men, and woman in thesecommunities that simply need a handup, pointedly not a hand out, a MarshallPlan to aid in addressing the ills of theurban communities.PeaceAkbar PrayEditor-in-Chief 
By THE NYT EDITORIAL BOARDQuietly over time, the gleaming glass building near Yankee Stadium thathouses the Bronx criminal courts has become a place where delay anddysfunction are the norm and centralideals of the American justice system — especially the promise of a speedy trial — have been disgracefully subverted.The state court system has a guidelinethat requires most felony cases to go totrial or be resolved within 180 days of the suspect’s indictment. While criminalcourts in every borough in New York City violate that guideline, in the Bronx,the city’s poorest borough, 73 percent of all felony cases exceeded the 180-daylimit, as of January.In recent years, there were moredefendants waiting years in jail for their trials in the Bronx than in the rest of the boroughs combined. The Bronxaccounted for more than half of the casesin the city’s criminal courts that weremore than two years old, and for two-thirds of people held for more than fiveyears awaiting trial.A powerful series by William Glabersonof The Times has painted a devastating portrait of a lackadaisical court culture inwhich the main actors in the Bronx seemutterly paralyzed or incompetent. Noneappear to have the necessary drive toensure that justice is done for thedefendants, the victims or the public.The Bronx district attorney, Robert Johnson,and the prosecutors serving under him showlittle sense of urgency as cases age. In oneludicrous case, an assistant district attorneyactually left on vacation in the middle of atrial she was working on. Defense lawyershave been allowed to exploit delays to helptheir clients, since witnesses can move awayand evidence can become tainted; sometimesthe defense lawyers simply delay cases tosuit their own schedules. And there are the judges — many elected through a politicalmachine-controlled process — who areunable or unwilling to exert strong controlover their courtrooms to resolve cases in areasonable time.The inordinate delays impose heavy tolls.Innocent people remain in jail for crimesthey did not commit. Memories fade,evidence dries up, and witnesses disappear,making convicting the guilty harder. Victimsand their families suffer, as does faith in the justice system’s ability to protect the public.In one case, as reported by Mr. Glaberson,Bronx prosecutors did not try a defendantaccused of murder until five years after thecrime. The defendant ended up going freeafter the first police officer to testifyanswered that he could not remember numerous details under questioning by thedefense lawyer. In another murder case,which also resulted in a not-guilty verdict,the star witness at the trial four years after the crime testified that he could no longer besure who pulled the trigger.As old cases have piled up in the Bronx,conviction rates have declined to less thanhalf in jury trials, far lower than elsewhere inthe city and well below the national rate. In2011, Bronx prosecutors won guilty verdictsin 46 percent of their jury trials, court datashows, down from 67 percent in 1989, whenMr. Johnson took office.While that dismal record may be partly a product of the skepticism Bronx jurieshave of the police, it also raises questionsabout whether the breakdown in the borough’s court system is lettingdangerous criminals go free. Like manyother states, New York has slashed court budgets in the past few years in the faceof a harsh recession. But the problem inthe Bronx began festering long beforethat and goes beyond a shortage of resources.Because of budget problems, the courtday has been shortened and now ends at4:30. But a lot more could beaccomplished if judges required all participants in proceedings to show up ontime — something that rarely happensnow — and stopped accepting prosecutors’ and defense lawyers’ weak excuses for delays.Part of the blame for the current mess belongs to state court administrators.They should have acted sooner todismantle the well-meaning butunsuccessful reorganization plan put in place in 2004 by Judith Kaye, then thestate’s chief judge, and take muscular action to address the Bronx backlog. In a positive step in January, the state’scurrent chief judge, Jonathan Lippman,dispatched a “SWAT team” of judges todeal with the delays. According to courtofficials, they have already cut thenumber of cases two years or older by 21 percent, mostly by arranging plea dealsand dismissing cases.But the problem runs deep. Changing theculture will require a new commitment by Mr. Johnson, Bronx criminal court judges and court administrators toimprove the management and work ethicin every part of the system. It will alsorequire enlisting more seasoned defenselawyers to take cases in the Bronx. Someadditional financing for court employeeswill be needed, too. But no managementreform will be sufficient or lasting unlessthe city’s political and judicial leadersraise expectations about what a well-functioning criminal justice systemrequires.
“in the Bronx, the city’s poorest borough, 73 percent of all felony cases exceeded the 180-day limit” 
Broken JusticeIn the Bronx

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->