purpose which is now accomplished, or due to changes in time, place and person,the co-op’s objectives may have become irrelevant and the members decide todissolve.
Method Used in This Survey
A passive Internet survey was conducted to find worldwide consensus on thequestion. Search engines were first used to find web pages and documentscontaining phrases like “successful cooperative”. Then the web pages anddocuments were carefully reviewed, and items which were copies, or secondarysources (i.e. referring to another primary source) were removed -- in this processmore than 50% of the material was eliminated. Then from the remaining originalitems, elements of advice called “success factors” were extracted, such as: “It is important to avoid creating too high expectations”“cultivates the support of both the members and the community at large”“clear-cut national cooperative strategy”“availability of technical training and technology” In some cases, inverse success factors – reasons co-ops failed were used, for example: ” (neg.)Inadequate communications among the members, board, manager, and thecommunity.”After reviewing the 175 success factors, they were grouped into 13 categories, andeverything was recorded in a Microsoft Access database, including1.
The category of the answer 2.
The answer itself (maximum 255 characters, summary if necessary)3.
The source URL of the document or web page4.
Information about the type of co-op being referred to (consumer, producer,single-project, financial, etc.) Having done this, the database of success factors can be queried and sorted andconclusions can be drawn from the overall body of knowledge. The database file iscontained in the accompanying CD and is called “success2.mdb”; in addition aversion of the data is embedded in this word document.
Leave a Comment