Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Relay IP v. Securities Industry Automation

Relay IP v. Securities Industry Automation

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13 |Likes:
Published by PatentBlast
Relay IP v. Securities Industry Automation
Relay IP v. Securities Industry Automation

More info:

Published by: PatentBlast on May 14, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/14/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
C.A. No. __________ 
JURY TRIAL DEMANDEDCOMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff Relay IP, Inc. (“Relay IP”) alleges the following for its complaint againstDefendant Securities Industry Automation Corporation (“Defendant”).
THE PARTIES
1.
 
Plaintiff Relay IP, Inc. is a corporation formed under the laws of the state of Delaware having its principal place of business at 2331 Mill Road, Suite 100, Alexandria, VA22314.2.
 
Defendant Securities Industry Automation Corporation is a corporation organizedunder the laws of the state of New York with a principal office at 11 Wall Street, New York NY10005. Defendant Securities Industry Automation Corporation may be served with process viaits principal office.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3.
 
This is a patent infringement action. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1338.4.
 
The Court has personal jurisdiction under the Delaware long arm statute over Defendant as it has availed itself of the rights and benefits of this District by conducting businessRELAY IP, INC.,Plaintiff,v.SECURITIES INDUSTRY AUTOMATIONCORPORATION,Defendant.
 
 in this jurisdiction, including by offering its services via the internet, which is accessible in thisDistrict. Defendant also regularly does business with companies resident in this District.5.
 
Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1391(b)-(c) and §1400(b), because substantial acts of infringement have occurred in this District in this District andDefendant is subject to jurisdiction here.
COUNT ONEINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,331,637
6.
 
On July 19, 1994, U.S. Patent No. 5,331,637 (the “’637 Patent”) entitled“Multicast Routing Using Core Based Trees” was duly and legally issued by the United StatesPatent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the ’637 Patent is attached as Exhibit Ahereto.7.
 
Plaintiff Relay IP is the sole and exclusive owner of all right, title, and interest inthe ’637 Patent and holds the exclusive right to take all actions, including the filing of this patentinfringement lawsuit, necessary to enforce its rights to the ’637 Patent. Relay IP also has theright to recover all damages for past, present, and future infringement of the ’637 Patent and toseek injunctive relief as appropriate under the law.8.
 
Defendant has infringed and continues to directly infringe one or more claims of the ’637 Patent, including at least Claim 1, by using the method claimed in distributing dataand/or data feeds via distribution network(s), including but not limited to the National MarketSystems distribution network running on the Secure Financial Transaction Infrastructure, which practice the Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode standard (“PIM-SM”) for multicastrouting.
1
In distributing data and/or data feeds via distribution network(s) in accordance with thePIM-SM standard, Defendant directly infringes one or more claims of the ’637 Patent, including
1
 
See, e.g.
, RFC 4601 at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4601.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->