Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
David Icke is being used by Illuminati ...

David Icke is being used by Illuminati ...



|Views: 26,870|Likes:
Published by Zander18
The title says it all.
The title says it all.

More info:

Published by: Zander18 on Apr 12, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less





David Icke, Arizona Wilder and the Biggest SecretBy Ivan FraserThe following is a short summary of a minor investigation into aspects of David Icke’s latestbook and his star witnesses Arizona Wilder and Credo Mutwa. Wilder claims to have been amind controlled slave who performed Satanic rituals for the Illuminati at which she witnessedmany famous people including the Queen Mother, shapeshift physically from a human to alizard and consume sacrificial victims. She claims that since her programming broke downshe has been able to reveal this information to the wider public.My own role in the Biggest Secret saga was that I was asked by David to help him checkspelling and offer any further information to his initial draft of the book. It was following myinput that David was introduced to Arizona and heard her revelations, which subsequentlybecame a focal point within the book and used as ‘evidence’ to support various themesoutlined therein.Having discussed my concerns with David’s wife and having sent David e-mails outlining myconcerns over errors in his book and a feeling I have that he has been set up withmisinformation and been the target of psychic manipulation, over a period from beforepublication to very recently (September 1999), and as yet having absolutely no feedback fromDavid about any of the major concerns, I decided to publish my findings at the David Ickewebsite forum.Consequently, I was banned from attending that forum by David Icke.I wish it to be known that I bear David Icke no malice over this affair and the reason forpublishing this information is to seek clarification and also offer information of which mostmay not be aware. My fears may be unfounded, but I feel that after reading this, you may seethey are justified. And if my fears have solid foundation, these issues need urgent clarification,both for the sake of David Icke and his readers.My suspicions about Arizona Wilder (AW) first manifested the first time I heard of her.Something in me said, ‘something isn’t right here’. A familiar feeling which usually turns outto be trustworthy, as anyone who has read Lifting The Veil knows.She was not mentioned at all in the draft copy of The Biggest Secret (TBS) which I had read.David had not met her yet. When the book was released people started ringing me withquestions like, ‘is it true about the reptiles’, and ‘is this stuff about the royal family true’. Atwhich time I replied that I thought it was, based on the fact that the version I had read statedonly the theory of the reptilians and that certain of the Royals were involved in Satanic rituals.
Soon I heard about Arizona Wilder. I reviewed the book again, this time the printed version,and asked Linda Icke (the British manager of Bridge of Love) to send a copy of the video fromwhich AW’s testimony was taken. I was by this time very dubious about AW’s statements. Herstatements had already overshadowed those of Christine Fitzgerald, Princess Diana’s healerand confidante, which were prominent in the version I read and which were not so sensational.However, Fitzgerald’s account may have been a ‘taster’ for what was to come, to ease the wayfor the far more incredible information which Wilder had to impart.David stated that he saw his encounter with AW as an amazing synchronicity which endorsedhis work in his latest book. How could she have known all of this stuff which tallied so exactlywith TBS? Well, I believe I am not as na
ve as David, and I know exactly how she could haveknown. He was passing copies of the book via post to me and others for editing. It was oncomputer. Both are simple to access by Intelligence people. We had also spoken over the phoneabout the reptilian issue. In fact I am shocked that David does not see this as a possibilityhimself.This brings I another character who is pivotal to the entire Biggest Secret thesis. It was acontact of David’s named Brian Desborough who introduced Arizona to David. Brian ismentioned as a source for a great deal of information in the book, having supplied most of thematerial upon which David based his idea that Martians came to Earth and founded theAryan race which the reptilians used as a vehicle to overtake the planet. Brian is also thesource of much of the information David had compiled on the Babylonian world, its myths andhow they fed into thesinister secret societies.It was Brian Desborough, a scientist and researcher who had worked for several aerospacecompanies, who was also looking at the draft copy of the Biggest Secret at the same time asmyself; i.e. before David met Arizona Wilder. Therefore the fact that Brian Desborough maybe responsible for fundamentally leading the direction of David’s research, if not plantingmuch of the basis of the book in David’s mind, is obvious. But then to be the same personresponsible for giving him a so-called eye-witness to testify to the verity of that information ishighly suspicious. Brian also writes articles on mind control and seems very knowledgeable onthe subject. Is it possible that he could be directly involved in some way that we are not beingtold about? Cathy O’Brien testifies to having been taken to military aerospace locations andNASA bases for trauma-based programming.David met AW and interviewed her for about 2 hours. Some of the questions were quiteleading, but her testimony revealed an awful lot if you know what you are looking for. She did
indeed endorse a great deal of David’s own theses; that is other people’s theses (againincluding many of Desborough’s) which David has agreed with. So closely, in fact, you wouldalmost think she had already read the book - or had been given the information beforehand!Or, considering that she claims to be an ex-mind controlled slave, could it be she was pre-programmed? Testimony from Mark Philips and Cathy O’Brien as to how arduous it is todeprogram a CIA slave makes me very suspicious that AW could be considered reliable. Sheclaims that since her programmer died, the programming broke down. I don’t believe this canbe accepted as such, and external experts would have to be brought in to convince me that if she was controlled to the highest level, that she could be so deprogrammed now as to beconsidered reliable.And don’t forget how much influence her testimony had to the final version of David’s book. Itwas her and only her who provided all the information about physically shapeshifting royalty,Pindar, the Belgian blood rituals which were allegedly attended by everyone from LaurenceGardner (!!??) to the Queen Mother!Before I watched the video I dowsed the box with a pendulum and asked questions. I don’tusually use dowsing, but considered it may be useful to evaluate this case from as many anglesas I could because if I was correct in my gut feeling then I had stumbled upon some verysignificant realisations. The basic questions were:Was she going to be telling me the truth? Yes. Wow! I hadn’t expected that.Was she also going to be telling lies? Yes. Ah!As I thought she was a Multiple Personality, I assumed that she had been set up. So I asked,‘Is she going to deliberately misinform David?’ Yes. This made me curious because I thoughtshe would be doing it from programming.I always like to ask questions I know the answers of now and then to check whether I aminterpreting the pendulum correctly.So I asked a question I was sure of the answer to: ‘Is she a programmed multiple?’ No. Thatwas absolutely the last thing I expected. I couldn’t see how she could be lying to deliberatelymisinform and not been a set-up multiple stooge.‘Then she isn’t a multiple?’ Yes.‘So has she ever been programmed as a multiple?’ No.

Activity (88)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Heriberto Hohlke liked this
xuedezu liked this
Kostas Renios liked this
Soledad Vidal liked this
Connie Knox added this note|
Ivan, I'm really sorry you had those experiences and disappointments. It's going to take some time for me to digest this very long letter. I had already moved beyond David as well as Alex Jones. Not that they haven't done outstanding work in the past, but both seem to be beating the same drum continually and I want fresh insights and perspectives. I have seen many others fall through ego.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->