Soon I heard about Arizona Wilder. I reviewed the book again, this time the printed version,and asked Linda Icke (the British manager of Bridge of Love) to send a copy of the video fromwhich AW’s testimony was taken. I was by this time very dubious about AW’s statements. Herstatements had already overshadowed those of Christine Fitzgerald, Princess Diana’s healerand confidante, which were prominent in the version I read and which were not so sensational.However, Fitzgerald’s account may have been a ‘taster’ for what was to come, to ease the wayfor the far more incredible information which Wilder had to impart.David stated that he saw his encounter with AW as an amazing synchronicity which endorsedhis work in his latest book. How could she have known all of this stuff which tallied so exactlywith TBS? Well, I believe I am not as na
ï
ve as David, and I know exactly how she could haveknown. He was passing copies of the book via post to me and others for editing. It was oncomputer. Both are simple to access by Intelligence people. We had also spoken over the phoneabout the reptilian issue. In fact I am shocked that David does not see this as a possibilityhimself.This brings I another character who is pivotal to the entire Biggest Secret thesis. It was acontact of David’s named Brian Desborough who introduced Arizona to David. Brian ismentioned as a source for a great deal of information in the book, having supplied most of thematerial upon which David based his idea that Martians came to Earth and founded theAryan race which the reptilians used as a vehicle to overtake the planet. Brian is also thesource of much of the information David had compiled on the Babylonian world, its myths andhow they fed into thesinister secret societies.It was Brian Desborough, a scientist and researcher who had worked for several aerospacecompanies, who was also looking at the draft copy of the Biggest Secret at the same time asmyself; i.e. before David met Arizona Wilder. Therefore the fact that Brian Desborough maybe responsible for fundamentally leading the direction of David’s research, if not plantingmuch of the basis of the book in David’s mind, is obvious. But then to be the same personresponsible for giving him a so-called eye-witness to testify to the verity of that information ishighly suspicious. Brian also writes articles on mind control and seems very knowledgeable onthe subject. Is it possible that he could be directly involved in some way that we are not beingtold about? Cathy O’Brien testifies to having been taken to military aerospace locations andNASA bases for trauma-based programming.David met AW and interviewed her for about 2 hours. Some of the questions were quiteleading, but her testimony revealed an awful lot if you know what you are looking for. She did