Professional Documents
Culture Documents
18 female, 2 male, age range: 17-30. Classroom session, with computer research and activities in groups. Specific feedback requested by staff member Guide: Identify specific feedback requested How well do I engage the students ? You have a good rapport with the students. Initially it took a while for the class to warm up but once you were into the activities they connected and engaged well with the session content. Refer to comments under the section Learning and Teaching Process. Do I talk too much? Overall there was a good balance of information and activity there was one point where you were covering grounds and areas that the information giving became a little lengthy and students were loosing focus. Also refer to the suggestions under the Learning and Teaching Process section How successful are the activities? There was a good choice of engagement activities that encouraged the students to think, search, consider and respond but potential challenges arose during the feedback part of these activities. I have made some suggestions for this further on in my feedback. Learning Objective - planning/organisation/preparation
Guide: Was a learning objective clear to the learners? Comment on the organisation of the learning session. Did this flow well and could the participants follow it easily? Were links made to other parts of the course or programme? Was the session well prepared?
Once
latecomers
arrived
there
were
14
students
in
this
session.
You
had
some
real
challenges
in
terms
of
the
layout
of
the
room
that
you
had
to
work
with.
This
was
a
very
long
narrow
room
with
six
computers
at
each
hexagonal
workstation.
There
were
data
screens
at
either
end
of
the
long
room
and
a
whiteboard
to
the
side
in
the
middle
of
the
room.
You
managed
this
well
making
good
use
of
both
data
screens
and
also
speaking
loudly
and
clearly
so
that
all
could
hear
you.
There
tended
to
be
only
a
maximum
of
4
students
at
the
workstations
so
this
spread
the
students
across
the
whole
room
with
only
2
at
a
table
in
some
cases.
I
was
aware
that
the
students
had
previously
been
allocated
to
specific
groups
so
this
impacted
on
their
seating
within
the
room.
On
this
occasion
it
appeared
as
though
their
groupings
were
not
significant
to
the
learning
outcomes
of
the
activities
(but
I
may
have
missed
something
here)
so
I
wondered
if
the
students
could
have
been
grouped
closer
together
for
this
session,
ie,
into
the
larger
part
of
the
long
room.
This
would
have
made
it
much
easier
to
hear
each
student
speak
when
they
were
giving
feedback.
The
whiteboard
could
also
have
been
rotated
so
it
was
easier
for
everyone
to
see.
If
they
were
required
to
work
with
their
allocated
groups
on
a
specific
project
the
students
could
have
been
moved
back
into
those
groups
later.
Learning
and
Teaching
Process
- implementation/facilitation/connection
between
theory
and
practice
Guide: Comment on the presentation and facilitation style, level of interaction, enthusiasm and interest; connection between theory and practice; authenticity. Identify any teaching aids or resources used, commenting on the effectiveness of these.
Gaining
feedback
from
the
groups
on
their
learning
took
quite
a
bit
of
time
as
there
were
at
least
7
to
8
feedback
sessions
for
each
activity
based
on
the
way
the
groups
had
split
themselves.
As
more
feedback
was
required
from
the
second
activity
I
noticed
that
students
were
loosing
focus
and
quietly
talking
or
engaging
in
other
activities.
Challenges
with
this
feedback
were
enhanced
by
the
difficulty
hearing
what
each
student
was
saying
in
such
a
large
room.
Some
other
ways
of
encouraging
feedback
could
include:
Combining
two
or
3
smaller
groups
to
feedback
to
each
other
and
then
identify
the
key
themes
(they
could
write
these
on
the
whiteboard)
There
could
be
a
different
key
question
focussed
at
each
group
that
builds
to
a
collective
picture
rather
than
all
information
fed
back
each
time.
As
they
are
all
sitting
at
a
computer
they
could
feed
their
information/responses
into
a
collective
class
wiki
and
then
collectively
pull
out
the
key
themes
or
look
at
similarities
in
processes
(this
also
overcomes
the
challenges
of
not
being
able
to
hear
others)
whilst
you
are
still
being
the
voice
that
keeps
the
class
together
so
even
though
they
are
on
screen
they
are
also
still
connected
in
the
room.
Throughout
the
session
your
instructions
for
activities
were
always
clear
and
easy
to
follow.
Relationship
with
Learner
communication/support/
unlocking
learner
potential
Guide: Comment on interaction between the lecturer and participants, nature of the communication, and how learners are supported, encouraged and challenged.
Key Comments Thank you for the privilege of observing one of your teaching sessions and providing feedback. The session I observed was well planned and undertaken. This was largely an interactive session with most students engaged throughout. You provided excellent resources and web links for the students to make use of. You had to contend with a few challenges such as the layout of the room and the difficulty of the students being able to hear each others responses. I have included a few suggestions that I hope may be helpful in assisting with these challenges and increasing student engagement during the feedback part of the activities. You have a good rapport with the students, positively encouraging them and stimulating them to think further and engage more deeply. Signature: Observer Heather Day Signature: Staff member: Helen Geytenbeek
Helen Geytenbeek, Learning and Teaching Observation ,Otago Polytechnic, April 2013.