Complaint for Patent Infringement
- 2 -
Case Nos. 3:12-cv1161-H-MDD and 3:12-cv-1765-H-MDD. Byfiling a complaint against MaxLinear in this District, Silicon Labs has subjected itself to the personal jurisdiction of this Court.6.
Additionally, the Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Silicon Labs because Silicon Labs has continuous and systematic contacts with theState of California and, on information and belief, does business in this District.7.
Silicon Labs conducts business within California by maintaining anoffice located at 940 Steward Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94085. Silicon Labsalso regularly conducts business in this District and has offered for sale and sold products and systems within this judicial district.8.
Silicon Labs has also committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in this District and has harmed and continues to harmMaxLinear in this district by, among other things, offering for sale and sellinginfringing products and systems in this judicial district.9.
Because Silicon Labs has availed itself of the privileges of conductingactivities in this District, it is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district. Giventhat MaxLinear is headquartered in Carlsbad, this District and the State of California has a sufficient interest in resolving this dispute.10.
Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1391(b), (c), (d), and/or 1400(b) because, inter alia, Silicon Labs is subject to personal jurisdiction in this District, Silicon Labs has committed acts of patentinfringement in this District and continues to commit acts of infringement in thisDistrict, Plaintiff MaxLinear is headquartered in this District, and key witnessesreside in this District.
MaxLinear engages in the design, development and manufacture of radio frequency and mixed-signal semiconductor solutions for broadband communications applications, and more particularly for use in complementary