Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
SOU's Academic Program Prioritization Report

SOU's Academic Program Prioritization Report

Ratings: (0)|Views: 756|Likes:
Published by Mail Tribune
Southern Oregon University ranked its academic programs as part of a planning process. This document offers a detailed description of the process and the rankings.
Southern Oregon University ranked its academic programs as part of a planning process. This document offers a detailed description of the process and the rankings.

More info:

Published by: Mail Tribune on May 17, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/02/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 Academic ProgramPrioritization Report
May 15, 2013
 
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 2Prioritization Guiding Principles ...................................................................................................................... 2Decision Making Process ....................................................................................................................................... 3Reflections on the Process .................................................................................................................................... 3Quintile Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 4New Program Definition ....................................................................................................................................... 5Program Rankings by Department .................................................................................................................... 5Program Rankings by Quintile ............................................................................................................................ 24
Academic Program Prioritization Report 1
 
Introduction
Much has been written about the state of public higher education and the challenges faced bycolleges and universities in meeting the ever-changing demands of a society that has grownless willing to invest in the future. Dwindling public support, particularly during an era of unprecedented technological expansion and globalization, means that what were once wellaccepted, even respected, ideals are no longer considered sufficient reasons for investing inpublic higher education. As a consequence, institutions, particularly regional, comprehensiveinstitutions like Southern Oregon University, increasingly find themselves in the midst of budget crises that drive critical decisions and planning processes. It is within this context that the process of academic program prioritization was developed. The objective of this process isto find the proper balance in allocating resources among programs deemed essential toachieving the mission and strategic goals of the institution. It is our hope that the workrepresented by this report will contribute to a strategic planning process that achieves such abalance and results in a more distinctive and sustainable SOU.
Prioritization Guiding Principles
The following were established and agreed upon by both Academic and Academic Support PPGs at the outset of the prioritization process:The process will be fair, honest, forthright, and responsible. It will follow the best examples of development and implementation undertaken by other universities throughout the nation.The process shall be open and transparent, with no a priori decisions having been made, andwith decisions made based on the published criteria.In order to set realistic priorities, it will be necessary to rank all programs by quintiles.The process will offer the opportunity for enrichment of programs, as well as the possibility of contraction or elimination.
 
We will embrace a culture of evidence, one that ensures that program decisions nowand in the future will be data-driven.
 
To enable better decisions in the future, the large database established for prioritizationwill be maintained going forward.
 
Transparent: The study criteria will be collaboratively developed, approved, and well-publicized in advance of the study.
 
Comprehensive: The study criteria will be broad in scope so as to encompass all aspectsof a program.
 
Consistent: The same study criteria will be applied to each program; only theirmeasurement may change as appropriate.
 
Inclusive: All university programs - instructional, student service, and administrativewill be analyzed, and all university employees will have the opportunity to participatein the analysis of their programs.
 
Demand-driven: The study will measure the demand for all programs as determined bystudents, employers, or internal constituents.
 
Data-based: The study will be based on both quantitative and qualitative data.
Academic Program Prioritization Report 2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->