Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
13-05-21 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) in the Israeli Supreme Court – false and delibverately misleading online public access records

13-05-21 Zernik v Minister of Justice et al (2689/13) in the Israeli Supreme Court – false and delibverately misleading online public access records

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1|Likes:
The online court file records in this case should be deemed by now false and deliberately misleading. The Supreme Court refuses to correct the false registrations of records previously filed by the Petitioner, and creates new false registrations of records filed in court. The petition itself addresses the fraudulent nature of the electronic record systems, which have been implemented in the Israeli courts over the past decade.
The online court file records in this case should be deemed by now false and deliberately misleading. The Supreme Court refuses to correct the false registrations of records previously filed by the Petitioner, and creates new false registrations of records filed in court. The petition itself addresses the fraudulent nature of the electronic record systems, which have been implemented in the Israeli courts over the past decade.

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on May 21, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/14/2014

pdf

text

original

 
1/11
 
Human Rights Alert, NGO
 
"
Joseph Zernik, PhD
 
"
31440
,
3144PO Box 31440, Jerusalem 91313 91313
 
13-05-21
Zernik v Minister of Justice et al
(2689/13) in the IsraeliSupreme Court – false and delibverately misleading onlinepublic access records
 
The online court file records in this case should be deemed by nowfalse and deliberately misleading. The Supreme Court refuses tocorrect the false registrations of records previously filed by thePetitioner, and creates new false registrations of records filed incourt. The petition itself addresses the fraudulent nature of theelectronic record systems, which have been implemented in theIsraeli courts over the past decade.
LINKS:
[1]
13-04-15 Dr Zernik v Justice Minister Livni and Director of Administration of the CourtsSpitzer (2689/13) – Petition in the High Court of Justice of the State of Israel (Hebrew withEnglish translation))
 
1. Index
Note: The Index entry appears as valid opening of a petition file.
 
2. General Details
 
 
2/11
 
File #:
2689 HCJ
 Appellant:
Dr Joseph Zernik
 
Division:
High Court of Justice
Respondent:
Minister of Justice
 
Filing Date:
April 15, 2013
Status:
Open
Last event:
Notice Filed/ by thePetitioner
 
Note:
 
1) The Petitioner is falsely listed as an “Appellant 
 
3/11
 
3. PartiesType: # Name Attorneys
Petitioner 1 Dr Joseph Zernik -Respondent 1 Minister of Justice Tzipi Livni Bert, YitzhaqRespondent 2 Director of Administration of Courts Michael Spitzer Barak Laser, Barak, StateAttorneyNote:
 
1) Here the filer is listed as “Petitioner”2) No certificate of Attorneys of Record for the Respondents:Attorneys Bert, Yitzhaq and Laser, Baraq has been filed orserved so far.
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->