Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Amethyst IP v. Targus Group International

Amethyst IP v. Targus Group International

Ratings: (0)|Views: 12 |Likes:
Published by PatentBlast
Amethyst IP v. Targus Group International
Amethyst IP v. Targus Group International

More info:

Published by: PatentBlast on May 23, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/23/2013

pdf

text

original

 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
 ___________________________________ §AMETHYST IP, LLC §§Plaintiff, § Civil Action No. ______________ §v. §
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
§TARGUS GROUP §INTERNATIONAL, INC. §Defendant. § ___________________________________ §
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Amethyst IP, LLC (“Amethyst”), for its Complaint against Defendant TargusGroup International, Inc. (“Targus”) hereby alleges as follows:
The Parties
1.Plaintiff Amethyst is a New York limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 325, Garden City, New York 11530.2.On information and belief, Targus is a Delaware Corporation. On informationand belief, Targus’s registered agent in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Company,Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801.
Nature of the Action
3.This is a civil action for the infringement of United States Patent No. 7,414,833(“the ’833 patent”) (attached as Exhibit A).
 
2
Jurisdiction and Venue
4.This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the United States,including 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq.5.This Court has personal jurisdiction over Targus because, among other things,Targus has committed, aided, abetted, contributed to, and/or participated in the commission of  patent infringement in this District and elsewhere that led to foreseeable harm and injury toAmethyst.6.Targus has also established minimum contacts within the forum such that theexercise of jurisdiction over Targus will not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Moreover, Targus has placed products that practice the claimed inventions of the ’833 patent into the stream of commerce with the reasonable expectation and/or knowledge that purchasers and users of such products were located within this District. And Targus has sold,advertised, marketed, and distributed products in this District that practice the claimed inventionsof the ’833 patent.7.Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and1400(b).
The ’833 patent
8. On August 19, 2008, the ’833 patent, titled “Portable Computer Case” was dulyand legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Amethyst is the assigneeof all rights, title, and interest in the ’833 patent, and it possesses all rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the ’833 patent.
 
3
Count IInfringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,414,833
9.Paragraphs 1-8 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.10.Targus has infringed, and continues to infringe, the ’833 patent under 35 U.S.C. §271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offering for sale,selling, and/or importing into the United States products that contain a computer case system asclaimed in the ’833 patent (“’833 Infringing Products”), including at least the Versavu Keyboardand Case for iPad 3 Generation.11.On information and belief, Targus has also indirectly infringed, and continues toindirectly infringe, the ’833 patent. On information and belief, Targus’s customers directlyinfringe the ’833 patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale ’833 InfringingProducts in the United States. On information and belief, Targus actively, knowingly, andintentionally (from at least the date of the service of this Complaint) induces infringement of the‘833 patent by making, using, offering for sale, and selling ’833 Infringing Products, as well as by contracting with others to use, market, sell, and offer to sell ’833 Infringing Products.12.On information and belief, Targus has also contributed to the infringement byothers (e.g., Targus’s customers and the users of ’833 Infringing Products), and continues tocontribute to infringement by others, by selling, offering to sell, or importing ’833 InfringingProducts into the United States, knowing (from at least the date of the service of this Complaint)that those systems constitute a material part of the inventions of ’833 Infringing Products,knowing (from at least the date of the service of this Complaint) those systems to be especiallymade or adapted to infringe the ’833 Infringing Products, and knowing (from at least the date of 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->