Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
173

173

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 74|Likes:
Published by sabatino123

More info:

Published by: sabatino123 on May 28, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/28/2013

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 
20877350
 
C 10-05449-RSCHIU DECL ISO RAMBUS’S OPPOSITION TO STMICRO’S MOTION TO STRIKE
GREGORY P. STONE (State Bar No. 78329)
 gregory.stone@mto.com
PETER E. GRATZINGER (State Bar No. 228764)
 peter.gratzinger@mto.com
JEFFREY Y. WU (State Bar No. 248784)
 jeffrey.wu@mto.com
KEITH R. HAMILTON (State Bar No. 252115)
keith.hamilton@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP355 South Grand AvenueThirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1560Telephone: (213) 683-9100Facsimile: (213) 687-3702PETER A. DETRE (State Bar No. 182619)
 peter.detre@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP560 Mission StreetTwenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, California 94105-2907Telephone: (415) 512-4000Facsimile: (415) 512-4077Attorneys for Plaintiff RAMBUS INC.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONRAMBUS INC.Plaintiff,vs.STMICROELECTRONICS N.V.;STMICROELECTRONICS INC.,Defendants.Case No. C 10-05449-RS
DECLARATION OF ERIC K. CHIU INSUPPORT OF RAMBUS INC.’SOPPOSITION TOSTMICROELECTRONICS N.V. ANDSTMICROELECTRONICS, INC.’SMOTION TO STRIKE IN PARTRAMBUS’S AMENDED INFRINGEMENTCONTENTIONS
Date: June 20, 2013Time: 1:30 p.m.Crtrm.: 3, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg
Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document173 Filed05/28/13 Page1 of 5
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 
20877350
 
C 10-05449-RSCHIU DECL ISO RAMBUS’S OPPOSITION TO STMICRO’S MOTION TO STRIKE
I, Eric. K. Chiu, hereby declare:1.
 
I am an attorney with the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, and representPlaintiff Rambus, Inc. (“Rambus”) in the above-titled action. I am licensed in the State of California and admitted to practice before this Court. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge, and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify competently as tothe matters set forth below.2.
 
A true and correct copy of Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories,dated July 8, 2011, is attached as
Exhibit 1
.3.
 
A true and correct copy of excerpted pages from Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Responses to Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories, Nos. 1-13, dated October 3, 2011, is attached as
Exhibit 2
.4.
 
A true and correct copy of Rambus Inc.’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims andInfringement Contentions (Patent L.R. 3-1), dated October 4, 2011, is attached as
Exhibit 3
.5.
 
A true and correct copy of excerpted pages from Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’sInterrogatory Nos. 1, 2, and 6, dated November 21, 2011, is attached as
Exhibit 4
.6.
 
A true and correct copy of excerpted pages from Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Second Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2, dated March 22, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 5
.7.
 
A true and correct copy of Appendix A to Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V.and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Second Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff RambusInc.’s Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2, dated March 22, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 6
. This documentwas designated “Highly Confidential – Subject to Protective Order” by DefendantsSTMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s (collectively, “STMicro”).8.
 
A true and correct copy of a letter, dated May 9, 2012, from Peter Gratzinger,counsel for Rambus, to Deidre Digrande, counsel for STMicro, is attached as
Exhibit 7
.
Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document173 Filed05/28/13 Page2 of 5
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 
20877350
 -2-
C 10-05449-RSCHIU DECL ISO RAMBUS’S OPPOSITION TO STMICRO’S MOTION TO STRIKE
9.
 
A true and correct copy of the Gratzinger Declaration in Support of Rambus’sUnopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions for Defendant LSI, submittedin
 Rambus Inc. v. LSI Corp.
, 3:10-cv-05449-RS, on June 13, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 8
.10.
 
On June 6, 2012, Rambus submitted to the Special Master in this case, Rambus’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories 1 and 4 and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof.11.
 
A true and correct copy of excerpted pages from Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’sInterrogatory Nos. 1-3 and 5, dated June 15, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 9
.12.
 
A true and correct copy of Appendix A to Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V.and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’sInterrogatory Nos. 1-3 and 5, dated June 15, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 10
. This document wasdesignated “Highly Confidential – Subject to Protective Order” by STMicro.13.
 
Counsel of record for Rambus in this litigation is not counsel of record for Rambusin Investigation No. 337-TA-753 before the International Trade Commission (“-753Investigation”). The protective order from the -753 Investigation limits disclosure to “outsidecounsel for parties to this investigation” and to experts and staff “employed for the purposes of this litigation.”14.
 
A true and correct copy of excerpted pages from Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V. and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Fourth Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2, dated July 30, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 11
.15.
 
A true and correct copy of Appendix A to Defendants STMicroelectronics N.V.and STMicroelectronics, Inc.’s Fourth Amended/Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff RambusInc.’s Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2, dated July 30, 2012, is attached as
Exhibit 12
. This documentwas designated “Highly Confidential – Subject to Protective Order” by STMicro.16.
 
A true and correct copy of excerpted pages from Plaintiff Rambus Inc.’s First Setof Requests for Production, dated July 8, 2011, is attached as
Exhibit 13
.
Case3:10-cv-05449-RS Document173 Filed05/28/13 Page3 of 5

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->