AUTHOR’S PROLOGUE: THE VOICE OF THEVISIONARIES
It’s not as hopeless as you might think – in fact, it might just be perfect.
You are about to read an organized collection of thoughts that you may have had atvarious times in your life, but perhaps could never quite fully integrate. Chances are, youwill also find many things in this book that you have never seen before, and which willutterly dazzle you. Hence, you can step out of the waiting room, as this next phase of your own personal initiation has just begun. The scroll that is about to unfold before youwill resonate deep within, triggering ancient memories from before the time that youwere born, giving you the keys to regaining your own freedom in a world that isincreasingly becoming a perceptual prison of fear and anxiety.We live in an age where tiny snippets of information perpetually rise and fall ineveryone’s life, blowing about with the futility of a rain of confetti – and without the proper context to put them into a framework of some kind, they are simply swept awayon the winds of tomorrow. And then, if they are remembered, the specific references aregenerally sacrificed to dim, murky hearsay, through toxic words like “They” or “thatstudy” or “I read,” which then emerge as, “Did you hear about
found that the light speed barrier was broken?
about it a while ago.” We have beenconditioned to automatically nod our heads in agreement when the almighty “They” areinvoked. “Oh wow… I didn’t know that
had done that!” Well, who is “They?” Whatstudy? Read it where? This fast-and-loose information game works temporarily with anopen-minded person when hearing new concepts similar to what we shall be presenting inthis book series, but we must remember that there is a far mightier “They” that hasenslaved the minds of most people – the consensus of mainstream thought. If you arereading these words slowly enough, then you’ll probably end up thinking about thisconcept, and how it has affected you and those around you, for days. Which is good.(Sometimes we will still need to use the word “they” to define a certain subset of people,such as the alternative science community, or a particular group of non-physical beingsonce named, or in discussing a particular study once the names have been given. We willcapitalize the word “They” and surround it with quotation marks when using it in thecontext we have just mentioned.)Ultimately, it appears that the subconscious gravitates towards the word “They” as it is asoft, comfortable substitute for God; deep inside, every person longs to be connected tothe source of their being, and therefore wishes to have a source of omniscience to drawfrom that he or she “knows is right.” However, let us recognize the paradoxical mind-split that this situation has created, once and for all. We ultimately want to use the word“They” to invoke God’s presence, but since the Renaissance,
science has boldlyattempted to
God from all “rational thinking”
through Pierre Simon de Laplace’sconcept of “logical positivism.” This is how “They” of Science have come toautomatically assume that God is irrelevant to the quest for truth. Scientists believe that