Professional Documents
Culture Documents
:
, .
, - ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
. . ,
, ,
, , .
- 1 :
, ,
. ( ) ,
. , .
,
. , , ,
, . ,
.
,
. ( happy planet
index ) ,
.
- 2 :
. ,
,
. ,
.
, .
,
.
,
.
- 3:
, ,
.
.
.
.
,
: , , ,
, .
- 4:
, .
, (
) 9.58 , 5.1 . ,
. ,
.
. ,
.
:
, , ,
, ,
,
.
4
in the form of subsidy incentives on the other. The document calls the regulator to
identify erroneous incentives and to reduce their use while also proposing legislation that
would incorporate costs in the strategic accounting of government and private companies.
Chapter 3 Transportation:
Improving the efficiency of the transportation system is one of the pillars in increasing market
productivity, lowering cost of living, lowering housing prices, reducing the damage caused
by air pollution and in reducing fuel imports. Quality public transportation is also critical to
increasing equality between the various sectors and between the periphery and the center
of the country, providing everyone with the opportunity for social advancement by ensuring
access to sources of education and jobs. Despite this, the government chooses to continue
to shelve good programs for many years while and avoid prioritizing mass transportation.
This chapter discusses the negative impact of insufficient investment and planning of
transportation, and proposes solutions in several categories: legislation and budget,
investment in buses, investment in pedestrian solutions, investment in bicycle transportation,
demand management and urban planning as well as policies for employers in the government
and private sector.
Chapter 4 Energy:
On the national level, electricity production is one of the main sources of pollution. Ministry
of Environmental Protection calculations found that the average external cost of electricity
production (including healthcare system expenses and loss of productivity in the market)
is 9.58 agorot per Kw/hour, or 1.5 NIS billion per year. It should also be remembered that
electricity production today is based on fuels whose prices are expected to rise over the next
several decades. Furthermore, many fuels come from sources hostile to Israel. Creating an
alternative to energy production that is not dependent on external parties will guarantee Israeli
independence and strength in the event of war or economic crisis. In addition, climate change
is a global threat that can only be confronted through regional energy cooperation.
The chapter proposes measures to manage a sustainable energy market in Israel through
behavioral change regarding energy consumption, demand management in private homes
and government institutions, extensive use of renewable energy and natural gas, advanced
technologies for electricity production and delivery, establishment of a national foundation for
energy efficiency, stringent standards for green construction, promotion of extensive regional
cooperation in electricity production and delivery as well as community ventures in energy
production and efficiency.
2008
. ,
.
:
, .
, ,
. ,
, , .
,2008
. ,
( 20 ) . ,
,
.
,
. ,
.
Green New Deal- New Deal-
30- .20- Green New Deal -
.
Green New Deal- .
,
, 2011
.
. ,
.
,Green New-
Deal , .
.
.
, ,
.
,
, .
12
. ,
. ,
. ,
.
.
.
.
.
: , .
. ,
. ,
.
.
.
,
.
( ).
,
.
18
2008
. ,
.
:
, .
, ,
. ,
, , .
,2008
. ,
( 20 ) . ,
,
.
,
. ,
.
Green New Deal- New Deal-
30- .20- Green New Deal -
.
Green New Deal- .
,
, 2011
.
. ,
.
,Green New-
Deal , .
.
.
, ,
.
,
, .
12
(
) , .
, ,
, ,
.
.
, ,
.
: ,
, , .
, 100%
.
, , ,2011
2009 .
.
2011 .1
.
.
, 2012 , 1500 ,-
1800 . - (
) 2,000 , .
2009 , .
, 10%-30% -
, 83% .
.
2009-2010
. 2
( ) ,
2009 ( 2010):
22
2 : 2009 201
: )1 ( : ,3 , .2009-10 .
( )2 . 2 , , 2011 ,
, , ,
15,300 , .
, 2010 .1 ,
(
).
.
:
2 : 2009 2012
: , ,
1 146% 2 .3 - 1 .
23
1
( )6
,
.
( ,)8
.
,
,
,
.
( 33 ,36 , ).
, . , , 59%
, 85% .OECD -
, ( )10PM 25% -
.OECD -
,
( ) .
,
.
17
. ,
. ,
. ,
.
.
.
.
.
: , .
. ,
. ,
.
.
.
,
.
( ).
,
.
18
,
.
1998 ,
, . . ,
. ,
.
, . ,
( 2) ,
.
. ,
, , .
.
, ,
.
: ,
, .
, , ,
. .
2 : .
19
.
,
. , ,
, ( .)20% -
.
,
, .
.
.
,
, , ,
. ,
. ,
, .
(
, ) 8 -
.
. ,
( )
.
, 0.5% -
: 2008 -
2014 5% , .10% - 2020
, :
.
.
,
.
.
:
( , , , ),
41
(
) , .
, ,
, ,
.
.
, ,
.
: ,
, , .
, 100%
.
, , ,2011
2009 .
.
2011 .1
.
.
, 2012 , 1500 ,-
1800 . - (
) 2,000 , .
2009 , .
, 10%-30% -
, 83% .
.
2009-2010
. 2
( ) ,
2009 ( 2010):
22
2 : 2009 201
: )1 ( : ,3 , .2009-10 .
( )2 . 2 , , 2011 ,
, , ,
15,300 , .
, 2010 .1 ,
(
).
.
:
2 : 2009 2012
: , ,
1 146% 2 .3 - 1 .
23
- .
: , , , , ; ;
; ;
.
.
(
) ,
.
,
. .
.
- ,
. ,
. ,
.
,
.
, - , ,
. ,
. .
, 1-
.2020
,
. , (
) , ,
, - .
,
,
.
44
:
, 0.8 ,
- , 1.4- .2020 ,
.
, .
, ,
. 1.4- , 20
( 0.5% -).
. ,
, .
:
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
)(smart grid
.
.
.
2020
)(ZEB Zero net Energy Buildings
( , ,
).
45
. .
,
,
.
, ,
-
, ,
.
,
,OECD
. , 5 - , 27
. , ( ) OECD -
1980 - ,4.3% 0.326 -- 0.371 -
13.8% ,
. : ,
. 2011
.
, .
, , ,
, :
46
, .
,
.
.
, , ,
. , .
. 5
- ,15.1%
.65.1%
,
. , 3 . 4 ,
1 5
.
.
5 : - , 35-54 2008 ,
, .
, ,
.
, .
.
47
.
.
. .
.
, .
.
, .
, .
, ,
. , , .
, .
, , .
.
.
.
. , , . ,
. ,
, .
.
, .
. ,
.
.
, .
, . ,
,
, . ,
1% , 400 .
, ,
. ,
48
. .
, .
.
.
, ,
, . )(underclass
,
. , .
. ,
.
,
( .)6
, , ,
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
. ,
, , .
, , . ,
.
, ,
( 80%) , 20% .
, ,
, . 80% 10% ( ,) ,
, , ,2.5% -
( )2012 ,6.7% . ,
, , ,
, .
, .
49
. ,
, .
, ,
.
, , ,
, , .
: , ,
.
.
-
.
, ,
, .
.
, .
,
. , ,
.
.
51
( ) 98
,2012 ,
.
3 : .
3 : ,.
:
. ,
. ,
( ).
.7 .
. , 10% -
, .
.
33
, , ,
, , .
, , ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
. ,
.
55
,
, ,
,,
.
,
.
, , ,
, .
.
. , ,
.
56
. , , ,
, , .
, ,
, , .
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
57
. , :
1.1 ( , , ) .
, -
. 1-3% ,
.
/ .
.
, .
2.2 .2015
, , . 2006
,5281
( ) .
,
. 2011
, , .
3.3 - .
2012 ;
. ,
.
4.4 38 ( . ,
. .
).
5.5
.
- , . ,
, , .
.
, :
.
, , , , ,
,.
40
.
,
. , ,
, ( .)20% -
.
,
, .
.
.
,
, , ,
. ,
. ,
, .
(
, ) 8 -
.
. ,
( )
.
, 0.5% -
: 2008 -
2014 5% , .10% - 2020
, :
.
.
,
.
.
:
( , , , ),
41
, ,
, .
.
. ,
.
, .
:
:
1.1 ,
.
.
, ( )
.
2.2 .
3.3 , -
.
.
4.4 , 10% .2015
20% 2020 50% .2030
50% ( ) 2030
(
) . ,
30% .2030
-:
:
. ,
. , ( :)
; (-) ( )
.
.
( ,)2010 , ,
42
3.3 TWh 16 - . :
1.1 , -
.16% , TWh 16 -
, 25% - ( 2020
62.8 TWh ,2020 ).
2.2 ( ) , 800 ,
10% . 3.3 TWh -
- 5% - .2020
( )
. ,
.
39 ( 2050/12
- ) , 85% -
, ,
35% ( 251 ) 65%
.
.
: -
,
, , (
) .
, ,
, ,
, ( ,
) . -
- , ()
) ,(capacity factor .
:
- ,
. ( / 10)10 /
,
.
,
; -
43
- .
: , , , , ; ;
; ;
.
.
(
) ,
.
,
. .
.
- ,
. ,
. ,
.
,
.
, - , ,
. ,
. .
, 1-
.2020
,
. , (
) , ,
, - .
,
,
.
44
:
, 0.8 ,
- , 1.4- .2020 ,
.
, .
, ,
. 1.4- , 20
( 0.5% -).
. ,
, .
:
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
)(smart grid
.
.
.
2020
)(ZEB Zero net Energy Buildings
( , ,
).
45
. .
,
,
.
, ,
-
, ,
.
,
,OECD
. , 5 - , 27
. , ( ) OECD -
1980 - ,4.3% 0.326 -- 0.371 -
13.8% ,
. : ,
. 2011
.
, .
, , ,
, :
46
, .
,
.
.
, , ,
. , .
. 5
- ,15.1%
.65.1%
,
. , 3 . 4 ,
1 5
.
.
5 : - , 35-54 2008 ,
, .
, ,
.
, .
.
47
.
.
. .
.
, .
.
, .
, .
, ,
. , , .
, .
, , .
.
.
.
. , , . ,
. ,
, .
.
, .
. ,
.
.
, .
, . ,
,
, . ,
1% , 400 .
, ,
. ,
48
. .
, .
.
.
, ,
, . )(underclass
,
. , .
. ,
.
,
( .)6
, , ,
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
. ,
, , .
, , . ,
.
, ,
( 80%) , 20% .
, ,
, . 80% 10% ( ,) ,
, , ,2.5% -
( )2012 ,6.7% . ,
, , ,
, .
, .
49
- - ,
.
,
, .
, , ,
, .
, ,
. 43% -
5.5% - 10 49 - .
.
, , , .
,
, .
-
-
,
, , .
, , .
, 7.85
. 2.6 .
. ,
. ,
, .
50
. ,
, .
, ,
.
, , ,
, , .
: , ,
.
.
-
.
, ,
, .
.
, .
,
. , ,
.
.
51
I do not believe you can do todays job with yesterdays methods and be in
business tomorrow
Nelson Jackson
. ,
- ,
, .
70 -
. , , .
.
, ,
300 . ( ) ,
, 100 - .
-
.80- 500 ,
(
, 553) . ,Brightsource Energy
, 2.6
, 4% .
:
, ,
.
:
(
-) .
, - ,
52
.
- :
. (feed in
) tariffs , 20
.2009 , , ,
6.3% 2000 17% -.
: ,
,2009 300,000 - .
, .
10% - -
, , -
30,000 .
. 5.5 ,
. ,
, .
6 . - . ,2000
8,500 , ,
21,000 , 24,700 .
:
: .
60 - ,
50 - . .
2.5 . 166 -
91 : 50 , ,
, 25 .
, .
- ,
5,200 , 63% , 37% -
.
2020 2- , 10,000 -
. , , .
4 - : , ,
2020 300 -
53
. 3 -
.
:
D&A Visual Insights
. 22,000 - ( ) .
, .
:
. ,
. , -
,
.
:
(
5281) .
, - .
230,000
( 2% , 66,000 - ).
:
,
. ,
.
. .
.
,
, ,
.
, ,
. ,
.
54
, , ,
, , .
, , ,
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
. ,
.
55
,
, ,
,,
.
,
.
, , ,
, .
.
. , ,
.
56
. , , ,
, , .
, ,
, , .
,
.
, ,
, ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
57