• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Visual Loss after Spine Surgery
B.
Steven Roth, M.D. Chicago, Illinois
 
311Page 1
Spinal Fusion from 93-03
050,000100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000400,000450,000
  1   9   9   3  1   9   9  4  1   9   9   5  1   9   9   6  1   9   9   7  1   9   9   8  1   9   9   9   2   0   0   0   2   0   0  1   2   0   0   2   2   0   0   3
Laminectomy,excisionintervertebral discArthroplasty kneeSpinal fusion
 Introduction
Visual loss after anesthesia and surgery is a rare, unexpected and devastating complication. In recent years,there has been heightened awareness of the possibility of visual loss after anesthesia for non-ocular surgery, and animpression, although yet unproven, that the incidence is on the rise.
[1,2]
Awakening with visual impairment mightwell be one of the most frightening and catastrophic post-anesthetic complications that a patient could sustain. Manyof the cases of post-operative visual loss have followed surgery on the spine, typically, instrumented procedures onthe lumbar or lumbar-sacral spine including fusion, and often involving multiple levels of the spine. The enormousgrowth of spinal fusion surgery over the past decade (
Fig. 1
) suggests that the incidence of this injury may increase.Hence, anesthesia providers can expectto frequently care for patientsundergoing these procedures, andshould be aware of the risk of  postoperative visual loss.
Fig. 1: In data from the National InpatientSample (ahrq.gov), it can be seen that spinalfusion surgery in the US has increased 5-foldover a recent 10 year period. Note the contrastto other orthopedic or neurosurgicalprocedures such as knee arthroplasty orlaminectomy.
The most frequently reported cause of  postoperative visual loss is ischemicoptic neuropathy (ION). The largestclusters of cases of ION reported in theliterature to date have been in patientswho underwent spine or open heartsurgery. Other reports of visual lossfollowed radical prostatectomy, radical neck dissection, and trauma surgery.
[3]
Most published reports are casereports, small case series, or compilations of cases from the literature. Three retrospective case-control studies have been performed, one in spine patients, and two in cardiac surgery.
[4-6]
 The ASA Postoperative Visual Loss Registry (POVL Registry) has the largest single series using the most uniformdata collection, with over 135 cases (http://depts.washington.edu/asaccp/eye/index.shtml), of which 93 involvedsurgery on the spine. Preliminary findings have been reported; a manuscript concerning the spine surgery patients isin press or will have been published prior to this year’s ASA Annual Meeting.
[2,7]
 This lecture will familiarize anesthesia providers with the current understanding of perioperative visual lossincluding a discussion of suspected causative factors and potential strategies for prevention, with discussionspecifically confined to visual loss in patients undergoing surgery on the spine. I will review some of the literatureon post-operative visual loss, but due to time and space constraints, it will not be possible to provide acomprehensive, in-depth review, nor can every relevant case report or study be included here. For larger scalereviews, the reader is referred to some recent review articles and book chapters.
[3,8-13]
 
Incidence
Two large retrospective studies, each from single institutions, estimated the overall incidence of  perioperative visual loss in the general surgical population to be between 0.003%-0.0008%.
[14,15]
The incidence of visual loss after spine surgery has been estimated in much smaller studies to be in the range of 0.028-0.20%.
[1,16,17]
 By further comparison, after cardiac surgery, incidence was estimated as high as 1.3%,
[18]
but 0.06% and 0.113% intwo more recent larger retrospective studies.
[5,6]
 
Differential diagnosis
[3]
 
Patients complaining of visual loss or of blurry vision postoperatively should be immediately evaluated byan ophthalmologist. Early brain MRI or CT scan may be indicated to rule out an intracranial process such as stroke.Corneal abrasions can also produce blurry vision, but also eye pain, photophobia, itching, and no loss of vision.They are painful and annoying to patients, but are easily treated. The much more serious issues involve perioperative
 
 311Page 2retinal ischemia, ischemic optic neuropathy, cortical blindness, and acute angle closure glaucoma. Retinal ischemiacan be central or branch retinal artery occlusion (CRAO or BRAO), and ischemic optic neuropathy is anterior or  posterior (AION or PION). Even more uncommon would be acute angle closure glaucoma. Of these, it now appearsthat the most common lesion that results in visual loss after spine surgery is PION.
[2,3]
The discussion below willconcern CRAO and ION. The reader is referred elsewhere for review of other causes of visual loss.
[3]
 
Specific Mechanisms of Visual Loss
1. Retinal vascular occlusion results in retinal ischemia due to decreased O2 delivery to the retina.
[19]
In most cases,the lesion is unilateral. Cases have been reported after spine surgery, and animal models have directly evaluated themechanisms of injury.
[20-22]
 
 A
.
Mechanisms of injury
: The most common cause of retinal ischemia with spine surgery is compression of the eyethat produces high enough intraocular pressures to stop blood flow in the central retinal artery. In older case reports,compression of the eye was attributed to pressure on the eye exerted by a horseshoe headrest with the patient prone.
[23]
However, there are cases in patients positioned prone on other headrests, where external pressure wasinadvertently exerted on the eye.
[24]
The mechanism of injury is due either to slipping of the head off the headrest, or contact of the eye with some other object, such as goggles placed over the patient’s eyes. Among the spine patientsin the POVL Registry with CRAO, none of them were positioned in a pin-head holder, in contrast to patients whodeveloped ION (see below). All of the retinal artery occlusions in the POVL Registry were unilateral injuries.
[2]
 Emboli can occur during lumbar spine surgery,
[25]
but a right-to-left cardiac shunt must be present to produce a paradoxical embolus to the central retinal artery or to a branch retinal artery (BRAO); the latter produces a lesser degree of visual loss
vs
CRAO. There is one published report of paradoxical emboli causing retinal ischemia withBRAO in a 12-year old child who underwent scoliosis repair. The child complained of visual difficulty 4 d postoperatively, at which time she had inferiorly located peripapillary cotton wool spots and loss of visual fields inthe superonasal quadrant in the right eye. There were no signs of external compression. A right-to-left shunt throughan ASD was found by contrast echocardiography.
[26]
 
 B. Clinical presentation
: Patients typically present with a unilateral injury, with no light perception or severe visualfield defects, abnormal pupillary light response, extraocular muscle dysfunction, chemosis, proptosis, and cornealdamage may also be present. Symptoms are usually present within 24 h of the procedure, and often uponawakening.
[3]
The fundus examination shows retinal whitening or edema, and a cherry-red spot. Retinal vessels maydemonstrate sluggish flow, or “boxcar” formation. Weeks or months later there is optic atrophy. MRI of the orbitmay early on show muscle enlargement or edema from compression of the eye.
[27]
The electroretinogram isabnormal. Angiography findings can include filling defects, absent flow, marked stasis, delayed retinal transit timeor retinal hyperpigmentation.
[28]
If the mechanism of visual loss is embolic, it may be possible to see emboli in theretinal vessels upon fundus examination.
C. Pathophysiology
: Numerous studies in several species of animals, including monkeys, cats, and rats havedemonstrated the effects of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) to produce retinal ischemia.
[20]
Similarly, weshowed in cats that increased IOP sufficient to extinguish the b wave activity of the electroretinogram (inner retinaelectrical activity in response to a bright white flash) decreased retinal blood flow to 6% of baseline, and choroidal blood flow to 0.6%.
[29]
Hayreh showed in monkeys a retinal survival time of about 90 min after ligation of thecentral retinal artery, and later reported that surprisingly, survival time was actually longer in atheroscleroticmonkeys.
[21,30]
However, increased IOP is a more severe insult than ligation of the central retinal artery because of the profound simultaneous decreases in both retinal and choroidal blood flow with increased IOP
[29]
and thedifferential susceptibility of some retinal cells to damage from increased pressure.
[31,32]
After retinal ischemia, theretinal circulation is hypoperfused; reperfusion injury may occur and further complicate the injury.
[33]
 Several studies have measured IOP with human subjects in the prone position, either in normal volunteers,or in those undergoing spine surgery. These studies generally show increased IOP in the prone position, further increases with the head-down position, and attenuation of the increases by head-up positioning, although there aredifferences in the extent of the changes.
[34-36]
The clinical significance of the changes remains unknown.While hypotension can decrease retinal perfusion, there is efficient autoregulation in the retinal andchoroidal circulations to compensate for decreased blood pressure. Retinal ischemia can also occur due toatherosclerotic disease.
[37]
However, this mechanism would not appear to occur acutely in the perioperative period.Hypotension alone seems to be rarely the cause of retinal vascular occlusion, probably because of efficientautoregulation in the retina, and because of the dual circulation of the retina, where the choroidal circulation is ableto provide O2 delivery via diffusion from the outer retina.
[38]
 2. Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (ION) Our understanding of ION after spine surgery is impeded by the lack of controlled studies, the absence of an animal model, and because the pathology of ION has not been well
 
 311Page 3characterized. There has been only one case-control study in spine surgery patients.
[4]
The risk factors for  perioperative ION in spine surgery have not been well defined. Spontaneously occurring ION, unrelated to surgical procedures, is one of the most common causes of sudden visual loss in patients above the age of 50 years. It isusually due to AION, and presumed to be of vascular origin. The specific mechanism and location of the vascular insult remain unproven.
[39]
Only recently has a rodent model for spontaneously occurring AION been described.
[40]
 Cases of perioperative ION after spine surgery have been reported in younger patients than those whotypically develop it spontaneously. There are cases of ION after spine surgery in children,
[41]
but most of theaffected patients have been adults. Most of our knowledge of perioperative ION currently comes from case reports,of which the largest and best described single series is the POVL Registry.
 A
.
Mechanisms of injury:
Possible factors involved in perioperative ION are decreased systemic blood pressure, blood loss, anemia or hemodilution, increased intraocular or intraorbital venous pressure (including the influence of  patient positioning and perioperative fluid resuscitation), abnormal autoregulation in the optic nerve, anatomicvariants in blood supply to the optic nerve, small cup to disc ratio, the use of vasopressors, the presence of systemicvascular risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, and smoking history, prone positioning, lengthy spinal fusion surgery, and other pre-existing systemic abnormalities such as sleep-apneasyndrome and hyper-coaguability.
[3,8,13,42,43]
External compression on the eye would not cause an isolated IONwithout also damaging the retina, and moreover, external compression would not exert pressure upon the posterior  portion of the optic nerve.
[29,44]
 
 B. Clinical presentation
:
[8-10]
Most of the cases occurring after spine surgery have a diagnosis of PION. However,the exact diagnosis may not be clear due to delay in examination or incorrect interpretation of the findings. Theonset of visual loss is typically within the first 24-48 h after surgery, frequently noted upon awakening, althoughlater onset has been described, particularly in patients who were mechanically ventilated and sedated in the post-operative period.
[2,3,9]
Patients present typically with painless visual loss, afferent pupil defect or unreactive pupils,and complete visual loss or visual field deficits. Optic disk edema and hemorrhages are seen upon symptom onset inAION; in PION, the optic disk is normal even though the patient complains of visual loss. Later, optic atrophydevelops. The lesion may be unilateral or bilateral, but most post-spine surgery ION cases have bilateralinvolvement. MRI of the orbits is often non-diagnostic.
[45]
Visual evoked potential is abnormal.
[46]
 
C. Pathophysiology:
ION results from circulatory insufficiency either within the optic nerve head (AION), or withinthe intra-orbital optic nerve (PION). Blood supply to the anterior and posterior optic nerves differs.
[47,48]
Theanterior portion is supplied by the posterior ciliary arteries and the circle of Zinn-Haller. The posterior is perfused bytwo main vascular supplies. The peripheral centripetal vascular system is the major supply, found in all optic nerves.It is formed by recurrent branches of the peripapillary choroid and circle of Zinn-Haller. Pial branches of the centralretinal artery and other orbital arteries also contribute. Branches of the pial vasculature run in the septa of the nerve.The axial centrifugal vascular system is formed by small branches from the intraneural part of the central retinalartery, and is not present in every eye.
[49]
 Only a few cases have been reported where histopathological examination of the nerve was performed.Three PION cases after surgical procedures were evaluated, although none involved spine surgery. All showedinfarcts in the intraorbital portion of the optic nerve, but results were not completely consistent, because while twoshowed lesions in the central axial portion and peripheral axonal sparing, the other case had the opposite pattern inone eye and complete axonal loss in the other.
[13]
Despite a larger autopsy series in AION, the location of the infarctwas not documented. Tesser et al showed recently that in a patient with spontaneous AION, axonal loss was in thesuperior part of the nerve, largely encircling the central retinal artery. The infarct was in the intrascleral portion of the nerve, extending 1.5 mm posteriorly. The authors suggested that a tight scleral canal contributed to a“compartment syndrome.”
[50]
In spontaneously developing AION, a low “cup-to-disc” ratio is thought to predisposeto ischemia, related to greater axonal swelling and alterations in axonal transport after ischemia. Spontaneouslyoccurring AION patients have a higher prevalence of hypertension
vs
normals, but only among those in the 45-64year age group. In most studies, diabetes is more often seen in AION patients vs normals, but not stroke or MI.However, there are disparate reports, and similarly, whether smoking or hyperlipidemia are risk factors remainscontroversial. Some recent studies suggest an association with pro-thrombotic factors, but there are conflictingreports.
[39,43,51]
 It seems that one or more factors (see “Mechanisms”) are often involved in an individual patient and in anunpredictable fashion. Most of the cases have some degree of hypotension or anemia. Many of the patients withION after spine surgery have been relatively healthy pre-operatively. Hypotension, blood loss, lengthy surgery, andlarge quantities of fluid administration seem to occur frequently in these patients. Yet these same conditionscharacterize many patients undergoing complex spine surgery.
[4,9-13]
As a result, it is possible that combinations of these factors, perhaps together with abnormal autoregulation in the posterior optic nerve circulation, pro-thrombotic
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...