F
ew things in life explain a person morethan the way he or she was raised,andwho did the raising.So whenever a per-son asks me about how I became the neurotic,distrustful,kick-a-hobo-when-he’s-down kindof human being that I am,I tell them the fol-lowing story.When I was six,I got a loose tooth.As chil-dren are to do in such situations,I became ter-ribly excited.My celebration was not unwar-ranted;our tooth fairy,Clarissa,was among thegreatest to ever live.She would consistentlygive us $1.50 and a beautiful,if disgustinglysappy,poem on a handwritten letter (withhandwriting that looked slightly like my father,Reuben’s).She delivered on time,every time.That evening,when my father came homefrom work,I announced the exciting news,andhis eyes lit up.“Oh!”he exclaimed.Then,sud-denly,his expression completely changed toone of utter sadness.He stepped back.“Oh,”he said once more,this time in a hushed tone.“What?”I asked him quizzically.“What didthat second ‘Oh’ mean?”“I don’t really know how to say this,”my fa-ther began.He stopped.Then,regainingstrength,he said,“Clarissa had an accident.”“An accident?”My father turned away,and then faced meagain.He explained that Clarissa had tragical-ly slipped and fallen off a cliff,at the very leastseverely maiming her wings,and at worst—well,the doctors said she might not make it.One thing was for sure,though:we wouldn’t beseeing Clarissa anytime soon.My world was collapsing around me,andmy mind exploded with questions.Why thehell had she been hanging around a cliff? Whoin the world was this child who was sleepingthere? And once Clarissa fell off the cliff,well,why didn’t she just use her wings to fly back onthe cliff? But I stayed silent,as I knew my fa-ther would have no answers.I remember,though,that he seemed to be hiding a smile.Idid not know why.Eventually,I asked,“Well,will I still get mymoney?”“Don’t worry,”my father answered,“I’m al-ready interviewing new candidates.I promiseyou that by the time you lose your tooth,we’llhave a new tooth fairy,and she’ll be every bit asgood as Clarissa.”I wanted to trust my father,but then again,this was the same person who had hired a toothfairy who had just fallen off a cliff.A few days later,I lost my tooth.When myfather got home that night,I showed him mynew smile.He responded with a grin of hisown,and he told me exactly what I longed tohear.“That’s great news,Mark! Because guesswhat? Just today,I hired our new tooth fairy!”My eyes widened.“What’s her name?”Iasked,heart beating wildly.My father’s smile grew.“Al.”I stared,waiting.“Al what? What’s the restof her name?”He gave me a look of surprise.Dad chuck-led.“No,Mark.Al.That’s
his
name.”“AL???!!! You got me a male tooth fairynamed AL?”My dad interrupted,“No,you have to un-derstand! He’s just great.He’s specificallypromised me in the contract that he’ll alwaysdeliver on time and give even sweeter lettersthan Clarissa ever did.He’ll be the best toothfairy in the world.”As my father’s smile dramatically vanished,he said in a hushed tone,“Mark,you’ve got totrust me.”I sighed.Ever the good son,I told him I did.I woke up early the next morning and,re-membering that I was expecting some madcheddar under my pillow,scrambled out of bed,tore the bed sheets away,removed the pil-low,and there,right on my bed,lay...mytooth.In a fury,I raced downstairs to interrogatemy father.Put immediately on the defensive,my dad insisted he had told Al about the tooth,and that he was in no way to blame for the mis-communication.Besides,he was sure that Alwould show up some time soon.The process repeated no less than ten days.I could not believe it.My tooth literally beganrotting in my bed.Already Al was becomingthe worst tooth fairy I could have ever imag-ined.By the eleventh day,I had just about givenup all hope.So imagine my surprise when thatmorning,as I removed the pillow,in my tooth’splace lay a brilliant $20 bill.I couldn’t believeit.Perhaps,I thought,I had gotten Al all wrong.Alas,next to the $20 bill lay a letter,reminis-cent of those Clarissa would give before hertragic plight.Frantically,I tore it open,eager toread a Clarissa-like sappy poem that wouldmake me feel as if losing a tooth were some-how a great accomplishment.I looked at the front.“you’re pal al!”it said,all in lower-case letters.The “a”in “al”wasbackwards.The handwriting looked slightlylike my father’s.Confused,I read on,not real-izing I was in for the most unwelcome surpriseof my young life:“Dearly mark,congrafulation off lossingyou’re toof! unfortunate,could not findchange.you owe me $19.50! accepting cash orcheck!”Then,scribbled at the bottom,“you’repal al.”A picture of a toothy grin accompaniedthe sign-off.It looked as if it had been drawn bya three year-old.Once more,the “a”in Al wasbackwards.I raced downstairs again,head pounding.When I told my father what had happened thatmorning,he unexpectedly let out a laugh.“Well,”he chuckled,“I guess you gotta payhim!”Shocked,I explained I did not have acheckbook.My dad was shaking,he was laugh-ing so hard.“Well,isn’t that a shame!”Tearsbegan streaming down his face from laughter.And with that,tears began to stream downmine as well.Looking back,that was the mo-ment I began to lose trust not only in hu-mankind,but in fairy-kind as well.That,my friends,was my childhood in a nut-shell.So if you don’t like me,don’t blame mefor who I am.Blame Al.
Mark’s dad claims that this is not the way it real-ly happened.mrdonig@stanford.edu.
D
uring the Presidential campaign in thefall,Vice-Presidential candidate JoeBiden remarked in an interview thatAmericans who earn more than $250,000should expect to pay more in taxes.“It’s timeto be patriotic,”Mr.Biden said.“Time to jumpin.Time to be part of the deal.Time to help getAmerica out of the rut.”I remember hearing that tidbit reported ontheradio one morning as I was waking up.Iboth cheered and cringed.I cheered becausesomeone was finally fighting back against theright’s mindless anti-tax fanaticism.I cringedbecause I was afraid anti-tax sentiment in thiscountry was so strong that Biden and Obamawere going to get clobbered over the remark.Of course,the Republican ticket wastedno time in jumping on the statement.VP can-didate Sarah Palin said “Raising taxes isabout killing jobs and hurting small business-es and making things worse,”seeming to for-get at that time exactly what was paying forthe body armor being used by her son in Iraq.John McCain was even more blunt,sayingBiden’s stance was “just plain dumb.”The strength and vehemence of the anti-tax forces in this country never cease toamaze me.According to Douglas J.Amy,pro-fessor of politics at Mount Holyoke Collegeand creator of www.governmentisgood.com,there are over 800 anti-tax groups in the U.S.Grover Norquist,the president of one of the most powerful groups,Americans for TaxReform,became one of the chief architects of President Bush’s tax cuts.Norquist is notori-ous for his statement,“I don’t want to abolishgovernment.I simply want to reduce it to thesize where I can drag it into the bathroom anddrown it in the bathtub.”And most recently,right-wing groups havebeen staging “teabagging”protests againsttaxes and government spending (though Iwonder where these folks were when GeorgeW.Bush was adding $5 trillion to the nationaldebt).Now,of course,no one likes paying taxes.And it is certainly possible for taxes to get sohigh that they choke off investment andweaken the economy,leading to decreasedeconomic growth.But I believe that there aretwo essential truths about taxes that the right-wing noise machine has sought to destroy.First,while excessively high taxes acrossthe board may be a bad thing (and that’s evenarguable),there is a wide range of tax rateswithin which the economy can prosper.Idon’t have extensive studies to back this up,but some anecdotal evidence is compelling.First,during the Clinton years,the top mar-ginal federal tax rate (for those earning overroughly $280,000) was 39.6 percent.The Bushtax cuts lowered it to 35 percent,and also cutcapital gains taxes,which was mostly a boonto the wealthy and ultra-wealthy.And there’s no doubt that the economywas far stronger,at least for the averageAmerican,during the Clinton years.DuringClinton’s two terms,the U.S.economy addedover 22 million new jobs,while duringDubya’s days the total is a paltry 1.9 million.Of course,there were a multitude of factorsthat went into these numbers,but clearly thesignificantly higher taxes of the Clinton yearsdid not destroy our economy.And here’s a fact that might surprise you:During the incredibly prosperous boom of the 1950s and early 1960s,the top marginaltax rate was 91 percent (on incomes of over$400,000).The second truth about taxes is perhapseven more fundamental.You cannot run acomplex,modern society with 300 million di-verse citizens without a strong,well-organ-ized government.And that government runson taxes.George Lakoff,a linguistics profes-sor at UC-Berkeley who writes extensivelyon politics,puts it best:“Taxes are our dues—we pay our dues tobe Americans and enjoy the benefits of American society,”he said.“Taxes are whatwe pay to live in a civilized society that is dem-ocratic,offers opportunity and has a huge in-frastructure available to all citizens.This in-credible infrastructure has been paid for byprevious taxpayers.Roads and highways,theInternet,the broadcast airwaves,our publiceducation system,our power grid—everyday we all use this vast infrastructure.Ourdues maintain it.”And Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wen-dell Holmes,Jr.put it even more eloquently:“I like to pay taxes.With them I buy civiliza-tion.”Even if,unlike Holmes,you don’t enjoysending your hard-earned money to the gov-ernment,remember that it would be impossi-ble for you to have your job as a teacher,lawyer,investment banker,doctor,etc.if wedid not live in a stable and prosperous socie-ty,whose stability and prosperity is paid for byour taxes.I’m not arguing that taxes should by de-fault always be high.I believe they should beas low as possible while still paying for the in-stitutions that keep our society just,fair andfunctioning.In short,wanting to enjoy the benefits of American society without paying taxes is likewanting to enjoy privileges at a country clubwithout paying dues.In the old days,peoplewith that penchant were called freeloaders.Today,they’re called conservatives.
David Goldbrenner would be happy to paytaxes if he weren’t a poor student.He can bereached at goldbren@stanford.edu.
The Stanford Daily
Wednesday,April 22,2009
N
3
O
PINIONS
O
n Monday,The Daily reported thatthe program known as Summer Re-search College (SRC) will no longerguarantee housing for undergraduates livingon campus while they conduct research overthe summer (see “Summer Research Col-lege cut”).In previous years,SRC housednearly 200 students in Manzanita and hireddorm staff to handle academic and socialprogramming for participating researchers.Students will no longer receive any sort of preference in the summer Draw,and will beplaced in different dorms around campus.Administrators cited the sharp drop inthe University’s endowment and resultingbudget cuts as reasons for the change.ViceProvost for Undergraduate Education JohnBravman observed that the elimination of the housing component of SRC would allowStanford to hand out approximately 15 moresummer research grants than the Universitywould otherwise be able to afford.The editorial board is concerned that theelimination of SRC’s residential program-ming is likely to have a negative impact onthe quality of students’ experience.Accord-ing to the Undergraduate Academic Life(UAL) Web site,SRC housing programming“is a series of free events intended to enrichundergraduates’ summer research experi-ence.”Until now,the housing component of SRC was integral to creating a sense of com-munity for those participating in the pro-gram.There is reason to believe that the ad-ministration’s decision to cut this part of SRC will preclude many of the friendshipsthat form and intellectual discussions thattake place in the comfort and safety of thedorm.It is also important to note that under-classmen,who constitute a large segment of the SRC population,are likely to suffer fromthe elimination of consolidated housing.Ris-ing sophomores and juniors benefit mostfrom having a sense of community,particu-larly during the summer when many of theirfriends are not on campus.Without a dormcommunity to fall back on,the editorialboard is worried that some students willhave a hard time managing the non-SRC so-cial environment.The consequences of dis-persed housing will vary,of course,from per-son to person,but students may flounderwithout dorm planning or events.SRC isabout much more than faculty-mentored re-search,and the social experience will be dif-ferent without the highlights of residentialprogramming.As stated time and again,the edit boardunderstands that the University faces a seri-ous economic challenge and has to make dif-ficult decisions about how to pare down thebudget.While it is important to preserve asmany grants for undergraduate research aspossible,it is also crucial to consider the mis-sion of SRC as a whole—particularly theramifications that the elimination of studenthousing will have on the summer researchexperience.It may be that it is less beneficialfor the University to fund an additional 15students if the overall SRC experience isnegative due to the loss of social cohesion.Moreover,it appears that the administra-tion’s decision to redirect SRC’s residentialfunding was made without student input.Asfar as we know,the administration did notdiscuss the changes with students who haveparticipated in the program in years past.Aswith the implementation of Vaden healthservice fees,changes to the housing draw andchanges to next year’s drop deadline,theAdministration did not adequately surveythe greater student body before implement-ing a change that would greatly affect them,and once again the editorial board is decry-ing the administration’s apparent lack of concern for student input.Hopefully theywill start listening soon.
SRC cut hazardous tosummer experience
The lazy college kid’sguide to Earth Day
O
kay,so the whole world is warming up—polar bears are drowning off theirmelting icebergs,our kids will neverknow what a glacier is and Florida is going tolargely disappear underwater.But thesehuge issues beg the question:what am I,as anopen-minded but admittedly lazy collegekid,supposed to do about it?Luckily,there are a lot of little ways thatwe can change our habits without having tochain ourselves to ancient redwoods or eatgranola for every meal.Here’s a list of sever-al easy things you can do this Earth Day tomake a little bit of difference—and if enough of us get on board,we might just savea few polar bears along the way.
Turn your lights off when you’re leaving aroom for more than 15 minutes
Most college dorms still use incandescentlight bulbs,which have not significantly ad-vanced technologically since they were in-vented 125 years ago (around the same timeas the telegraph and the steam locomotive).If you don’t want to install CFL bulbs,whichare 75 percent more efficient than tradition-al incandescent bulbs),turn your lights off when you’re not going to be around.Duringthe day,use windows and natural lighting in-stead of electricity.Your computer also uses an absurdamount of energy,which you can cut downon by setting your computer to go to sleepautomatically during short breaks.And assweet as those flying toasters might be,don’tuse a screen saver—they use almost tentimes as much energy as a computer in sleepmode.When you go to sleep,turn your com-puter off—it is an urban legend that turningyour computer on and off repeatedly hurtsthe machine.
Bring your own coffee mug
In 2005,Americans used and discarded14.4 billion disposable paper cups for hotbeverages.If put end-to-end,those cupswould circle the earth 55 times.Based onanticipated growth of specialty coffees,that number will grow to 23 billion by 2010—enough to circle the globe 88 times.Plus,those coffee cups are lined with petro-chemicals in order to keep them from leak-ing.Based on hot cup usage in 2005,thepetrochemicals used in the manufacture of those cups could have heated 8,300 homesfor one year.If you bring your own to-go mug,mostplaces will offer you a 15 or 25 cent discount.Or save that embarrassingly exorbitant fourdollars you’d spend on a latte and just makea drink at home before you go.
Take a shorter shower
Every four minutes in the shower,you useup to 10 gallons of precious fresh water.Plus,heating water accounts for up to 25 percentof the total energy used in a single-familyhome.That’s more energy,on average,than isneeded to drive a medium-sized car 12,000miles.
Only do your laundry when you have a full load
It takes 40 gallons of water to do an av-erage load of laundry with a top-loadingwashing machine,and 86 percent of energyconsumed by washing goes into heating thewater.How to cut down? Wash only yourreally disgustingly dirty clothes in hotwater.Most clothes can safely be washed incold,and this alone could eliminate up to1,600 pounds of yearly CO2 emissions inthe average household (just think abouthow much more a dorm emits).As for thedryer,the lint filter on your dryer can de-crease the energy used per load by up to 30percent,so make sure to clean it before youstart a load.
Print double-sided or on old scrap paper
Here’s the whirlwind of statistics:Over 40 percent of the world wood har-vest ends up as paper.Last year,the UnitedStates threw out 20 percent of all the papermade in the world.One fifth of all the tropi-cal rainforests in the world disappeared be-tween 1960 and 1990.It takes about 31 mil-lion BTUs to make a ton of paper—enoughenergy to power a U.S.home for two months.The average cost of a wasted piece of paper is$.06.When you’re buying printer paper,buyrecycled.Set your printer to print double-sided or feed it scrap paper that you don’tneed anymore.And think twice about print-ing things—are you one of those compul-sive hi-lighter kids,or could you just read orstore it on your computer instead? Onceagain,not too hard.
EDITORIAL
Unsigned editorials in the space above represent the views of The Stanford Daily's editorial board and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Daily staff.The editorial board is comprised of two former Daily staffers,three at-large student members and the two editorial board co-chairs.Any signed columns and contributionsare the views of their respective writers and do not necessarily represent the views of the entire editorial board.To contact the editorial board for an issue to be considered,or to submit an op-ed,please email editorial@daily.stanford.edu.
Managing Editors
The Stanford Daily
Established 1892
A N I N D E P E N D E N T N E W S PA P E R
Incorporated 1973
Tonight’s Desk Editors
Julia Brownell
News Editor
SamSvoboda
Sports Editor
Chelsea Ma
Features Editor
Chris Seewald
Photo Editor
Ben Cohen
Copy Editor
Laura Chang
Graphics Editor
Devin Banerjee
Deputy Editor
Nikhil Joshi
Managing Editor of News
Wyndam Makowsky
Managing Editor of Sports
Emma Trotter
Managing Editor of Features
Agustin Ramirez
Managing Editor of Photo
Joanna Xu
Managing Editor of Intermission
Stuart Baimel
Columns Editor
Tim Hyde,Andrew Valencia
Editorial Board Chairs
Cris Bautista
Head Graphics Editor
Samantha Lasarow
Head Copy Editor
Board of Directors
Christian Torres
President,Editor in Chief
In HoLee
Chief Operating Officer
Someary Chhim
Vice President of Advertising
Devin BanerjeeKamil DadaMichael LondgrenTheodore GlasserRobert MichitarianGlenn Frankel
Contacting The Daily
:Section editors can be reached at (650) 723-2555 from 3 to 10 p.m.The Advertising Department can be reached at (650) 721-5803,and theClassified Advertising Department can be reached at (650) 721-5801 during normal business hours.
O
P
-E
D
S
TEAL THIS
C
OLUMN
My pal Al
T
HE
V
OICE OF
E
XPERIENCE
Taxes are patriotic
DavidGoldbrenner
Please see
EARTH
,page 5
MarkDonig
Leave a Comment