UNCLASSIFIED
(U)
Contents
Note
onSource
Material
Used in
thePreparation
of
theReport
(U) viii
List
of
Acronyms
Used in
theReport
(U) ix
Executive
Summary
and
Conclusions
(U) xii
I.
Early
Influences on
Interrogation
Policy (U) 1
A.
Redefining the Legal Framework For the Treatment
of
Detainees
(U)
1
B.
Department
of
Defense Office
of
General Counsel Seeks Information
from
the JointPersonnel Recovery Agency (JPRA)
(U)
3
C.
JPRA Collaboration with Other Government Agencies (OGAs)
(U)
6D.
JPRA Support to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
(U)
8
E.
JPRA Recommendationsfor GTMO
(U)
11
F.
Colonel Herrington's Assessment
of
GTMO
(U)
12
G.
JPRA Prepares Draft Exploitation Plan
(U) 14II.
Development
of
New
Interrogation
Authorities
(U) 16
A.
CIA's Interrogation Program
and
the Interrogation
of
Abu
Zubaydah
(U)
16
B.
JPRA Assistance
to
Another Government
Agency
(U) 19
C.
Senior
SERE
Psychologist Detailed From Department
of
Defense to Other GovernmentAgency
(U)
23
D.
Department
of
Defense General Counsel Seeks Information on
SERE
Techniques FromJPRA
(U) 24
E.
The Department
of
Justice Changes the Rules
(U)
31
F.
JPRA 's Special Program In Support
of.
(U)
35
1.
August
2002 Training Proposal
(U)
35
2.
JPRA Creates Project 22B
(U)
37III.
Guantanamo
Bayas
a
"Battle
Lab"
for
New
Interrogation Techniques
(U)
38
A.
GTMO Stands
Up
a Behavioral Science Consultation Team (BSCT)
(U)
38
UNCLASSIFIED
Leave a Comment
Also see: http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmaga... http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2...