Proud to support CSM!
Y\ue005u\ue006 \ue007\ue008ud\ue002\ue004\ue008 \ue001\ue005dy
p\ue006\ue002\ue007id\ue002\ue004\ue008, K\ue002vi\ue004 Duffy,
i\ue004vi\ue008\ue002\ue007 y\ue005u \ue008\ue005 \ue008h\ue002 f\ue005u\ue006\ue008h
ASCSM m\ue002\ue002\ue008i\ue004\ue003 \ue005f \ue008h\ue002
y\ue002\ue000\ue006.
ASCSM Welcomes Chairman of the Board
of Trustees, Dr. Michael Nyikos, to our next
Student Government meeting on
October 23 at 7 PM in Student
Center Ballrooms A and B.
Students: Come hear Dr. Nyikos
speak about school policies and
answer your questions.
$25 gift card
raf\ue000ed for the
audience at
each meeting.
STUDENTSRecent progress has been made
in the production of steel plating used
for ship hull structures. Dr. Shiro Imai,
graduate of the University of Tokyo
and current employee of ABS Tech-
nology gave detailed this topic in his
Thursday lecture to the Metallurgical
and Materials Engineering (MME)
department. Dr. Imai, who has a
history of working with the shipyard
steel industry, spent the majority of
his talk describing the advantages
and characteristics of a new steel-
making process
known as Ther-
momechanical
Control Process
(TMCP), which
produces better
steel than other
techniques.
The technology was originally de-
veloped in Japan in the 1970\u2019s. \u201cWe
have optimized the chemical compo-
sition,\u201d Dr. Imai explained, which gives
the TMCP steel higher strength with
a lower carbon equivalent. \u201cThere are
microstructural changes through the
TMCP process.\u201d
Dr. Imai went on to say the chang-
es made to traditional steel have
resulted in a material that has some
excellent properties: superior tough-
ness, lower \u201chardenability,\u201d and better
\u201cweldability.\u201d The main advantage of
TMCP steel, Dr. Imai explained, is its
strength. \u201cIf we use a big container
carrier we must use a thicker plate.
Amanda Rock
Staff Writer
Andrew Swiger, president of
ExxonMobil\u2019s Gas and Power
Marketing Company, recently
addressed Colorado School of
Mines (CSM) students as the
\ue000rst speaker in the Mines 2008
Executive Lecture Series. Swiger
graduated from CSM in 1978
with a degree in petroleum en-
gineering and has since worked
for ExxonMobil in a number of
positions located around the world.
Swiger\u2019s speech dealt with the
future of the energy industry, spe-
ci\ue000cally focusing on the role natural
gas will play in the next quarter
century. According to ExxonMobil\u2019s
predictions, \u201cOverall growth (in en-
ergy consumption) to the year 2030
is likely to average 1.3% per year.\u201d
Swiger continued by mentioning
that consumption of \u201cnatural gas is
likely to grow [by] 1.8% per year.\u201d
By comparison, consumption of
renewable energy sources are ex-
pected to grow 1.5% per year, oil
by 1.2% per year, and coal by only
.9% per year. Growth in demand
for natural gas is expected to be
highest in Asia, which is develop-
ing rapidly, whereas developed
areas such as North America and
Europe will have lower increase in
demand. \u201cLooking ahead, every
major demand region in the world
will demand increased imports of
liquid natural gas,\u201d said Swiger.
Swiger went on to speak about
coal. Coal is currently highly com-
petitive, as \u201ccosts average just
over a nickel per kilowatt-hour.\u201d
Because of this, coal currently
supplies about 50% of the coun-
try\u2019s electric power while natural
gas supplies about 17%. Natural
gas also has certain advantages,
including \u201chigh ef\ue000ciency as well
as low greenhouse gas emissions.\u201d
Because of increased demand
for natural gas, the industry will face
major challenges. \u201cLooking ahead,
every major region in the world will
Executive Lecture Series
MME Seminar:
Steelmaking gets a boost
But if we increase the strength,
we can reduce the thickness,\u201d be-
cause TMCP steel thicknesses are
signi\ue000cantly lower than traditionally
fabricated steel.
According to Imai, this thinner,
\ue000ner-grained variety of steel also has
some advantages when it comes to
lifespan. \u201cWe\u2019ve changed the chem-
istry a little bit in the steel to reduce
corrosion,\u201d he said. \u201cIt takes about
twice as long now. We are testing
the new steel with Japanese ship
owners, resulting in fewer pits [from
corrosion] of shallower depth.\u201d The
TMCP steel\u2019s re-
sistance to cor-
rosion means
a lifespan that
makes it look
even better as
a product. Ad-
ditionally, ship
production with the steel is relatively
faster.
Dr. Imai added an environmen-
tal incentive to the list of technical
advantages. Apparently the mate-
rial\u2019s resistance to corrosion makes
paint and other polluting coatings
unnecessary.
Dr. Imai insists TMCP steel is
changing the face of shipbuilding in
Asia. He did not, however, discuss
cost of production or other eco-
nomic concerns, instead focusing
on the metallurgical and chemical
advances that have been made over
the past thirty years since TMCP was
invented.
LILY GIDDINGS / OREDIGGER
The TMCP steel\u2019s resis-
tance to corrosion means a
lifespan that makes it look
even better as a product
demand increased imports of lique-
\ue000ed natural gas,\u201d Swiger said. For
example, by 2030, \u201cAmerica\u2019s de-
mand is expected to grow tenfold.\u201d
In order to address increases in
demand, ExxonMobil is engaged in
upgrading the size of production
facilities, including larger liquefac-
tion plants, larger ships and larger
receiving terminals. \u201cEach of these
advances in economies of scale
has resulted in signi\ue000cantly lower
production and distribution costs,\u201d
Swiger said. ExxonMobil\u2019s natural
gas operations place special em-
phasis on Qatar, which is the larg-
est exporter of lique\ue000ed natural gas
in the world. Developments by Exx-
onMobil are expected to \u201c\u2026Double
its capacity by 2010,\u201d said Swiger.
Swiger then talked
about the need to ad-
dress challenges of di-
minishing natural gas
supplies by describing
some of Exxonmobil\u2019s
unconventional types of
natural gas. These in-
clude tight gas, which is
gas trapped in imperme-
able underground forma-
tions, as well as coalbed
methane and shale gas.
Swiger stated that as
natural gas production
declines, \u201cIt will take more
and more unconventional
wells to offset production
decline.\u201d One example
of tight gas production is
Piceance Basin in Colo-
rado. In the case of the
Piceance Basin, the res-
ervoirs will not \ue001ow with-
out stimulation. This is
why ExxonMobil is using
specialized technology
such as Fast Drilling and
Just-in-Time Perforation.
\u201cExxonMobil is continuing
to change the landscape
of unconventional tech-
nology,\u201d Swiger stated.
Swiger concluded his
speech by talking about
Greg Davies
Staff Writer
what primary enablers will be
necessary for continued increases
in production. These included ac-
cess for responsible development,
technological advances, opera-
tional excellence and a supportive
market environment. However, as
Swiger pointed out, a supportive
market environment is \u201cOut of the
control of any producer.\u201d Growth
in liquefied natural gas will be
necessary to meet increasing
global demand, while growth in
unconventional production will be
needed to offset the decline in con-
ventional gas production. Also, the
industry will require a rapid transfer
of technology and a significant
amount of new investment in order
to meet upcoming challenges.
The committee made recom-
mendations about changes that
should be made to the curriculum,
but unfortunately, the proposal died
in the Undergraduate Council and
the Faculty Senate chose not to
override their decision. The com-
mittee determined that it was re-
jected because
departments
did not want
courses re-
moved on prin-
ciple and that
a reshuf\ue001ing of
courses might
have an impact
on departmen-
tal resources. A
core curriculum
review was determined to still be
needed, but without administrative
support, the discussion cannot go
forward.
The \ue000fth presentation was given
by Doctor Chet Van Tyne on the
\u201cConnections\u201d program that was
tried a few years ago. Dr. Van Tyne
discussed the concept of cluster-
ing courses and students together
in such a way as to form learning
communities. When this was previ-
ously tried, there was a signi\ue000cant
effect on student retention. It was
determined that mentoring made a
signi\ue000cant difference, that students
who felt like they belonged were
more likely to persist in their educa-
tion, and that the content of a \ue000rst
year program was not as important
as the personal contact.
Doctor John Humphrey and
Director of Student Development
and Academic Services Ron Brum-
mett gave the \ue000nal presentation,
\u201cAcademic Advising in the First
Year.\u201dB r u m -
mett men-
tioned that,
\u201cNext to qual-
ity of instruc-
tion, academic
advising is the
next most im-
portant area.\u201d
It was pointed
out that the
schools that
had \ue000rst year courses had stu-
dents that performed signi\ue000cantly
better than schools that did not.
Humphrey concluded that the
academic faculty should be more
engaged with the advising of
students.
After the last three presenta-
tions, another group discussion
ensued, raising such issues as the
disconnect between faculty and
tenured track, the involvement of
the extended community in the
review of curriculum and how to
get students to talk more with
advisors.
Dr. Barefoot then addressed
some of the questions raised, not-
ing that the most important aspect
of everything \ue000tting together is the
rewards system. She said that
the faculty needs to feel that they
have an incentive to participate
in the first year programs. She
also said that the faculty should
volunteer for the programs in-
stead of being required, since the
faculty might resent being forced
to participate.
The discussion then concluded
for lunch before splitting into
smaller focus groups that would
concentrate on many of the issues
raised in the discussions.
Harrison, who helped orga-
nize the conference, felt that the
discussion was productive, partly
because of the large turnout of the
faculty. She said that it was a good
chance to \u201chear the president\u2019s
view on a residential campus,\u201d as
well as a good opportunity \u201cto get
a group of diverse individuals to
talk about the \ue000rst year.\u201d
The conference was just the
\ue000rst step towards improving the
\ue000rst year on campus, and Har-
rison hopes that towards the end
of the semester to the beginning
of the next, smaller groups can
be formed to focus on details
and how to implement many of
the ideas discussed at the con-
ference.
Open discussion encourages solutions
continued from page 1
We ask our students to
take risks, to grow, to think
about their life purpose, to
be transformed. We can ask
no less of ourselves.
Leave a Comment