Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
DM OTT-#120357-V1-CCIA - Reply to National Post Response to Mo

DM OTT-#120357-V1-CCIA - Reply to National Post Response to Mo

Ratings: (0)|Views: 35 |Likes:
Published by hknopf

More info:

Published by: hknopf on Jun 05, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/23/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
DM_OTT/285491.00003/120059.8
Court File Nos.: A-394-12 and A-395-12
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
BETWEEN:
RICHARD WARMAN AND NATIONAL POST COMPANY
Appellants-and-
MARK FOURNIER AND CONSTANCE FOURNIER 
Respondents
REPLY OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENER THE COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION(Motion for leave to intervene, to be heard in writing)
(Rules 109 and 369 of the Federal Courts Rules)Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP55 Metcalfe St., Suite 1300Ottawa, ON K1P 6L5Jay Kerr-WilsonAriel ThomasTel: 613-236-3882Fax: 613-230-6423Solicitors for the Computer andCommunications Industry Association
 
 
DM_OTT/285491.00003/120059.8
TO:
The Registry
 Federal Court of AppealThomas D'Arcy McGee Building90 Sparks Street, 5th floor Ottawa, OntarioK1A 0H9AND TO: Brazeau Seller LLP55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 750
James Katz
Tel: 613-237-4000Fax: 613-237-4001 jkatz@brazeauseller.comSolicitors for the Appellant,Richard WarmanAND TO: Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP2100 Scotia Plaza40 King Street West, Suite 750
Casey M. Chisick 
Tel: 416-869-5403Fax: 416-644-9326cchisick@casselsbrock.com
Jason Beitchman
Tel: 416-860-2988Fax: 647-259-7993 jbeitchman@casselsbrock.comSolicitors for the Appellant, National Post CompanyAND TO:
Mark FournierConstance Fournier
2000 Unity RoadElginburg, ONTel: 613-929-9265Fax: 609-379-8793Respondents
 
i
DM_OTT/285491.00003/120059.8
TABLE OF CONTENTSTab Title Page
1
Reply written representations of the CCIA
 1
This Appeal raises public interest questions that the CCIA is well suited to address
1The CCIA is not encouraging a particular outcome of the case 2
CCIA’s members’ interest in the legal principles raised in this Appeal is not “merely jurisprudential”
 2The issue of compliance with the Berne Convention is important to the proper determination of the issues3
CCIA’s proposed intervention would not duplicate CIPPIC’s
4Conclusion 4
Authorities
2
Canada (Attorney General) v Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada
,2010 FCA 217
 
63
Canadian Association of Broadcasters v Canada
, 2007 FCA 233 84
Canadian Taxpayers Federation v Benoit 
, 2001 FCA 71 195
 Fishing Vessel Owners' Assn. of British Columbia v Canada (Attorney General),
 [1985] FCJ No 110246
Globalive Wireless Management Corp. v Public Mobile Inc.,
2011 FCA 119 307
 Merck Frosst Canada Inc. v Canada (Minister of National Health and Welfare),
 [1997] FCJ No. 155; [1997] ACF No 155388
 Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc v Canada (Attorney General)
(CA) [1990] 1 FC 90 41

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->