• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
BY EMAILArthurTophamPub/EdThe Radical ressBox21633arkervilleHwyQuesnel,.C.V2J6T8Email: adicalradicalpr-ess.conrApril20, 2009Danieloulin,Counsel,Canadianuman ightsommissionDANIELPOULINDANIEL.pOULIN@CHRC-CCDp.CADearDanielPoulin.RE: Harry Abrams and ,he Leqguelor Humah Righls of B'hai Brith Canadav. ArthurTophamand the RadicalPrcss,comFilc Nunber: T136019008The oundationalasisor hecomplaintgainst yself, rthur opham ndmy websltewww.RadicalPress.comy HarryAbrams nd heLeagueor Human ights f B'nai BrithCanada as,accordingo Mr. Abrams wn words,hepublicationn my websiteof thehistoric ocument nownvario sly as heProtocolsf the Learned lders fZion"In Mr.Abrams'nitial omplainto heCanadianuman ights ommission,ecerved by yourofficeAugust28th,2007. on he op ofthe ist of articleswhichheandhis cocomplainant,heLeagueorHumanightsfB'naiBrithCanada.eltwere"discriminatory"ndcontrivedto promotengoingatredffectingersonsdentifiableas ews nd/or s itizensf lsrael". as he ollowing:hltp:rv!vr!.r:ldacalprcss.!orr:lndtllt:lllllrtt.djllthterlqt-lp!gll!!i?LTHE PROTOCOLSOFTHEI-EARNED ELDERSOFZIONThisarticle, rokenntoa series f fourpans,id notappear n hewebsiteeforemanyof other rticles hichMr.Abrams lso ncludedn his istof offensive. discriminatory"material ndso t is safe o assumehatMr. Abrams elt t to beof specialmponancen hiscomplaint.Mr.Abrams,n deferenceo said rticle nd n reply o a NewsReleaseoncerninghe complaint hichhad ento hemedia,includingheQae.nelarihoo bserrer\,wroteaIettero the Editorof thisnewspaperhttp://www.bclocalnews.com/bc_cariboo/quesnelobserver/opinion/letters/4379867.htm1
 
lsinceemovednder hreat f a law suitby Mr. Abramsl whichwaspublishedntheJanuary27,2008edition nwhichhe stated:Editorl
Re:Freealonlsre hreatened,eedba(k.heObserver,an.23"lamHarryAbrams.neofthecomplainantsn theArthur opham anadianumanRightsmatter. y commentsrebrief nd n respectf the act hat hismatters still nanearlytagerocedurelsicl.Section3 oftheCanadianuman ights odesiclismisunderstoody many eople.But ts ntentionsclear.t is o encoulageanadiansromall backgroundsoivecivillylsiclandpeacefullytogetherwithoutiDcitementofhatred,whichissocialllcausricand ivisive nd ften oftenshegroundor 'utureiolence. I havellegedopham aintainswebsitehatontainsubstantivexpressionikely oincitehatred ndcontempt gainst ews.Onevery specific temcomplained f is there-publicationfaspects f the notoriousCzarist-eraorgery: The ProtocolsftheLearnedEldersof Zion.This viciousscreed, ebunked oth as raudulentand hatefulmany imes,was asubstantialropagandaomponentnHitler'sNazi-erapropaganda,nd sadly,remains n circulation,mainlyn Arab countries oda],The"bloodibels"of the Protocols ccuseheJewsof many errible things.It is a classicnparanoid,acist iterature,Takenby thegullibleas he confidentialminutesof aJewishenclave onvenedn the astycarsofthe 19thcenturl, it hasbeenheraldedby anti-Semites sproof.Jewsreplottingotake overhe*orld.Tophams fully entitled o hisprivateopinions,whateaerhey are.But whenviolent,viciousantasies re madepublic,henhoseaffected houldhavea right ofreasonableecourse. nd this egislationndhisproccssre reasonable."boldsmine. TIByhisactionshereforebelievet safeo nfer hatMr.Abramseelshat he publicationf theProtocols"y myselfssomehowivingproofhat n doing o amcommittingn llegalctand reakinghe awas t is aiddown n Section3( ) oftheCuruulian unanRigrl.rA(I. apart rom he act hat t is an historicocumenteadilyavailablenotherwebsitesn Canadandroundheworld. otomentionold nhardcopyditionsyotherwiseeputableookublishersnd ellersuch sCrdpl?^.arecognized,ewish wnedook eller eren Canada.As I will show nmy argumentsn defensef my right opublishll hesaidocumentscomplaintedf and o dosowithout eed oustifytupon ccusationsf being
 
discriminatoryn doingso, he nformation ontainedn theProtocols"ocumentaroutweighs,n fact, ranscendshe alsityof theargument y Abrams ndBBC hat hedocumentsnothing orehan crude,alicious,ateful,vicious"antasy nd nantiSemiticorgery oncoctedy theCzar'ssecret olicen order ojustify thevilificationofJewsiving n Russianuringhe periodf theirnitialublication,irca1906.It isthereforencumbent pon hecomplainantsnd he CHRC oincluden bothof theirStatementf ParticularcndDisclosuresopies f this mportant, elevant ocument; newhichclearlyoutlineshe very ssues nddeedshat haveubsequentlyanifestedthemselvespon heworld'sstagehroughouthe2fth Century nd nevitablyed oincreasednalysis ndcriticismof theactions f thoseewswhoprofesso andsupportthe deologicalenetsnd gendaontainedn the political hilosophynown sZionismwhich sat hebasis f thissocalled Czaristorgery".In many espectshisone ocumentxemplifies hevery eason hy haveakent upon myself o riskpublishingt and ace he nevitableacklash ndscourge f falseaccusationshichHarryAbrams nd heLeague or HumanRights f B'nai BrithCanada avebrought gainstmyselfandmy websiten their ibelous nddefamatorychargehat"contriveopromotengoing atred ffectingersonsdentifiable sJewsand/or scitizensf Israel."To quoteut heurlto thearticlepostedn mywebsites theretbrensufficient.f thatwasall thatwasnecessaryf thecomplainantsnd hecommissionhen hatwouldalsohave ufficedn hecase ftheother 7articleshichMr.Abrams ndhisco- complainant,heBBC cited henproceededo reproducen theirentiretyn their aterStatementf Pa(iculars ndDisclosureo thecommissionnd o myself. It is o benotedswellat hispointhat hecomplainantsuplicatedneoftheartrclesalreadyncludednthenitial orpus f said omplaintnd itedtasecondime n theiradditionalrticlesater dded n n theirMarch 9,2009Statementf Particulars.he articlenquestioneingDr.HenryMakow's Judaism: Conspiracygainstews,Humanity?"ftp://www.radicalpress.com/?p=260As I have tated bove hisparticularocument,ueoits relativemportancenestablishinghe ibelous nd exatiousature f this omplainty heMr.Abrams ndtheLeagueor Human ights f B'naiBrithCanada. ustencludedn full n theDisclosuresf both heCHRCand he woComplainantsn the ase. f not hen tplacesme. heRespondentn theobvious ndunfair position f having o reproducehedocumentn full n hardcopyor each f thepartiesnvolvedn hiscomplaint.responsibilityhat s not only unjustified n hepartof thecommissionnd heTribunal(aserheTribunal'swnpolicies)ut ikelyhighly iased ndprejudicialowardheRespondenthowould ncurnadditionalost n terms fprovidinghese ocumentsnhardcopyoallpartiesoncernedrioro theproposedearing.As suchwouldsk hat heCommissionakeeed fthis equestnd ncludehedocumentomplainedf by theComplainants,o wit,theProtocols f the -earned
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...