• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
MOTIONTO FURTHERAMEND CHRC STATEMENTOF PARTICULARSBYEMAILArthurTophamPub/EdTheRadical ressBox 4633BarkervilleHwyQuesnel..C.V2J6T8Emaiq{Liqq!!j!!ii!alp1s$,e11!April23,2009Nancy -afontantRegistryOfficerCanadianuman ights ribunal\!rq.!=dsuai.\!4tqh-g!.r!DearNancyLafontant,RE:Harry AbrNmsand he League or Human Rightsof B'nai Brith Canada .Arthur Tophamand he RadicalPress.comFilc Number: T1360/9008Themotion ontained ereinears pon heAmendedtatementfParticulars hichheRespondent,rthurTopham.eceivedtom commissionounsel, anielPoulin. atedApril 8. 2009.Theres oneadditionalssuef immediate oncem ontainednthe section fthcAmendedtatementf Particularsitled lSSUFlS"which equiresmmediateedress.nthissectionMr. Poulinhasstated:''Thessue9:blrdisedhe,forehe Tribunal n thiscases as.follows:Did lheRespondentsommuniceter cduseo becommunicaled.n ||hole or inpart.btmeansofacompuler, ncludinghe inlerrur. any mtLrcr hatislikelytLtcxpLtseewsantl olhernon-u,hite[sic]o hdtredr contempLontrary section3 o.f heCafiadiunHumanRightsAct?The wordingf thisstatementeedso bechangedn order oreflectandcomplywith theactualssuesoutlinedn theoriginal omplainty HarryAbramsnd heLeagueorHuman ightsf B'naiBrithCanada.Apart romhe aulty useoftheEnglishanguage,hichappearso beendemicthroughouthemajorityof thecorrespondenceeceivedhus ar by the respondentromtheTribunalandhis sstatedithoutmalice),henaturef this omplaintnd heextrememportancef it to themajorityof Canadiansegardinghedeliberatelylanned
 
precedenthichhecomplainantsopeo establish,emandshat heactualllegedcomplainteclearly tatedatherhan henebulous,oorlywordedextwhichMr.Poulinhasprofferedllpartiess helssue"n thiscomplaint ase.Allow me o remind heTribunal ndallpartieshat hiscomplaint ontainsordingwhichwill. if successfullyccomplishedy thecomplainants,adically lter he abilityofspecialnterestroupsuch sB'nai BrithCanadand heircounterparts.heCanadian JewishCongressnowa subsidiary ftheCanadianouncilfor srael ndJewishAdvocacy).heJewishDefense eague nd heSimonWeisenthal enter, t al to use henefarious ection3 of theCHR Ad to charge nyonen Canada ith "antiSemitism" r"haterimes"who mightcriticize nyaspect flsraeliomestic ndoreignpolicyor theideologicaloundation ponwhich hestate flsrael s premised hich s,bydefinition,commonly nownasPolitical ionism.As such, n thecommission'statementf Paniculars,hisaspect f the ISSUES"hasbeeneither purposelyverlookedand deliberately ltered n order o deflectaway fromtheoriginalwordingoas o complywithhesubterfugef thecomplainantsr else t is merelyan unwining error on thepartof someonewhohasn'ta sulficientgraspof theEnglishanguager the egalexpeniseo realizehe mportancer importof retaining thepreciseriginalwording. n thecase f Mr. Poulin. ounselor thecommission,I cannotaccept hat he s unawarefthe importance f the natureofthe wording so thatleaves nly oneof theother wo options ndat hispoint 'm notwilling o speculatenwhichof them t mightbe.Whatdo expecthough,n factdemandn the orm of a request.s that heTribunal onceagain et hings ightand evel heplaying ieldback oitsoriginal ontours yinstructinghecommissiono deletehedeceptiveext, andothernon whitelsicl"and replacet with heoriginal extof thecomplaint hicheads.and/oritizens f Israel".The necessityordoingsooughtnot o be ncongruouso thecomplainant's ounselMr.Kurzand hemanifesteasonablenessf doingsoshould.ollowtheabove xplanation,alsobeevidento both heTribunal ndMr. Poulin. Ilthere is any further brmality or motion halyourequire,pleaseet me know as soonasoossible.Sincerely.
ArthurTophamrosePublisher/EditorTheRadicalPress.comCc:DanielPoulin.ounsel. anadian umanRightsCommissionMarvinKurz.Counsel. 'nai Brith Canada
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...