• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
1
 
2345678910
 
n
 
121314IS16171819202122232425
 
X- ------------
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 
-vs — LYNDONLaROUCHE, et al.
r 
 Defendants
--X
CRIMINALACTION NO. 88-243-A
 
X-
 
_____________ _x
Thursday, Deceitiber 1, 19B8Alexandria, Virginia
 
Transcript of Bench Conference, and testimonyof Witnesses ELIZABETH JEU, PAM COWDERY FRANCESCHETTO,and RICHARD MAGRAW on the seventh day of trial in theabove-captioned matter.
 
BEFORE:
 
The Honorable ALBERT V. BRYAN, JR.,Judge United States District Court
 
APPEARANCES:
 
(As heretofore noted:)
 
* * *DON McCOY, RPROFFICIAL COURTREPORTER 683-3668
 
2
 
VOLUME VII-AIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT_COURT
 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VlfclNllT: | =
 
Alexandria Division *™~-
:
-.....-*-
 
 
INDEXWITNESS FOR THE UNITED STATESDIRECT
 
CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS
 
ELIZABETH JEU 11
 
18 27 29
 
PAMELA COWDERY PRANCESCHETTO 31
 
45
 
RICHARD MAGRAW 96
 
128 180 195
 
EXHIBITSGOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO. 3 2-FGOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO. 3 2-H and IGOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO. 3 2-DGOVERNMENT EXHIBIT NO. 3 2-C
 
RECEIVED
 
14
 
15
 
28
 
30
 
* * *
PROCEEDINGS MR. ANDERSON:
 
Your Honor, may we approach the
 
Bench?
 
(Thereupon, a conference was held at the Benchwith Court and counsel, out of hearing of the jury, andreported as follows:)
 
MR. MOFFITT: After a conversation, Mr. Reilly and Ilast night, the following is our motion. We want to — I moved inExhibit 20.-AA. The time I moved in Exhibit 20-AA because Iraised an objection early in the examination of that witnessabout whether or not that testimony was being elicited withrespect to the tax case, Count XIII, or our case. At that pointMr. Robinson said that anything after 1983 was coming in in thecase involving the mail fraud, so under that theory, I mo-vedthat document in.
 
It later appears now that the document only came inin the tax case and was only being utilized in the tax case,so I have ended up now -moving in a document I can't evenargue — 
 
THE COURT: You want to back out?
 
MR. MOFFITT: Yes, sir.
 
MR, REILLY: Yes, sir.
 
THE COURT: The Government never offered it anyway?
 
MR. MARKHATI: We would have offered it anyway. And nowto take it out, Your Honor, would leave an inference
 
with the jury that is unwarranted. It has been talked about.Several people — 
 
THE COURT: Xf you think the jury is going to
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...