Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
WAS Demands Clarification Around Insulting Response From WWF and Tom Arnbom on the Matter of Susi!

WAS Demands Clarification Around Insulting Response From WWF and Tom Arnbom on the Matter of Susi!

Ratings: (0)|Views: 251|Likes:
Published by Carola Ankar
Tom Arnbom and #WWF seem maintain their stand on #Susi #wolf
Tom Arnbom and #WWF seem maintain their stand on #Susi #wolf

More info:

Published by: Carola Ankar on Jun 12, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
WAS demands clarification around insulting responsefrom WWF and Tom Arnbom on the matter of Susi!
As a member of WAS and also a board member of the organization, I was like many othersappalled by an article in the hunters' house organs where WWF.s representative TomArnbom pronounce that the now world famous she-wolf Susi could be euthanized. It isreasonable to ask whether Tom speaks on its own behalf or on WWF as an organizationstands behind the statement so I put a straight and simple question in WWF.s log andattached WAS reaction to the statement. The question ought to have been answered with asimple yes or no, but instead of giving a straight answer came an answer that almost couldbe described as "hello ax handle" and nowhere in the response was there anything thatanswered my question. Instead, they had just outright copied a reply by Tom Arnbom toanother person who also had raised some valid questions and even where one mightconsider that it was more a question of Tom Arnboms own opinion than a statement by aworldwide organization. WAS organization finds it odd that the WWF so clearly take the sideof individual industry instead of a biodiversity and one for Sweden and Scandinaviagenetically important wolves, perhaps the most important thing we have.Our follow-up question must be if not the WWF as a large and powerful organization insteadof a little submissive pronounce "This fall, the reindeer back down from the mountains andmy wish is that they move to an area where Junselevägen The bitch does not agree to" andinstead require moving them to an area where Susi has not done turf? It is something thatwe require from WAS. Since WAS want answers to what is meant by the statement that "Inprincip_ there are no organizations that mind problem wolves to be removed."Does that mean that all other animal rights and environmental organizations than WWF andthe Swedish predator association does not exist then? Or are we just a few players withdifferent opinion about that section so we do not count?Tom Arnbom states that "If the alternative options do not work, and because I think it isunethical to move the bitch a fifth time, I think we should be prepared to sacrifice may bethe last resort."
 
Is it WWF.s view that it would be less unethical to kill the bitch?Finally, WAS organization stands for, and fighting for biodiversity, nature and theenvironment in balance.We believe that it is man who must adapt to nature and not vice versa, and we wonderwhat's wrong with WWF.s opinion on this?Per Dunberg / WAS, Wolf Association Sweden
Questions to Tom Arnbom and Arnboms answers below!Jaana's question:
HOW CAN YOU PREDATOR EXPERT VOICE TO KILL JUNSELE WOLF? IT'S wrecked predatorpolicy that has cost and no protective measures are taken! THAT'S not the wolf that cost; IT'STHERE THAT YOU MANAGE NOT TO KEEP A PROTECTIVE MEASURES INSTEAD. THIS ReindeerCOUNTRY HAD BEEN UNUSED MANY YEARS BEFORE, AND ONCE THEN WHEN herders HEARDTHERE IS A GENETIC IMPORTANT WOLF, moved reindeer THERE! ALSO PROTECTION AGENCYHAS poured MANY IGNORANT DECISION, which cost UNNECESSARILY for taxpayers, BUT IFYOU PREDATOR EXPERT WALKS ON THE SAME TRACK, IS IT REALLY BAD. WHY FIGHT YOUNOT FOR SWEDISH fauna PROPERLY, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE ON A LEACH OF THESWEDISH HUNTERS ASSOCIATION'S IN SOME WAY? MONEY BEHIND OR? I WILL TERMINATEMY LONG-STANDING MEMBERSHIP IF HE'S EXPRESS HOW TO WOLF JUNSELE be killed!!! IPAID TO YOU AS PANDA SPONSOR SINCE 1990, BUT WILL ALSO TO INFORM THIS STORY, IFTRUE? EXPECT ME A STRAIGHT ANSWER.
Per Dunbergs question:
I would like an honest answer to the question of whether this is your official position in thequestion of 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->