Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
IVR Poll Memo

IVR Poll Memo

Ratings: (0)|Views: 6,876 |Likes:
Published by Nick Reisman

More info:

Published by: Nick Reisman on Jun 12, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/09/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
Andrew Sharp Consulting · 2942 N. Hermitage Ave., Chicago, IL 60657 · (773) 327-1796
MemorandumTo:InterestedpartiesFrom:AndrewSharpRe:Surveyanalysis,SD4,SD6,SD46,SD51,SD53,SD56,SD60Date:June10,2013
SD4–Sen.Boyle
Thefollowingresultsarefromasurveyconductedamongregisteredvotersinthe4
th
StateSenateDistrictofNewYork.
Q1.ThinkingaboutRoev.Wade,thelandmarkSupremeCourtdecisionthatrecognizedtherighttochoosetohaveanabortion,doyousupportoropposethisdecision?
RespondentsPercentageSupportRoev.Wade95166%OpposeRoev.Wade48934%
Q2.AnewpieceoflegislationcalledtheWomen'sEqualityAgendaaimstoprotectRoev.WadeinNewYork,ensureequalpayforwomenandprotectvictimsofdomesticviolence.Ifyoursenatorvotesagainstthisnewlaw,wouldyoubemorelikelyorlesslikelytovoteforthatsenatorinthenextelection?
RespondentsPercentageMorelikelytovote26823%Lesslikelytovote91477%
Methodology
ThissurveywasconductedonJune7,2013usingIVRtechnology.Weattemptedtoreacharandomizedlistofapproximately25,000registeredvotersinthe4
th
District.Theresultswereweightedbypartybasedonregistration.
 
 
Andrew Sharp Consulting · 2942 N. Hermitage Ave., Chicago, IL 60657 · (773) 327-1796
SD6–Sen.Hannon
Thefollowingresultsarefromasurveyconductedamongregisteredvotersinthe6
th
StateSenateDistrictofNewYork.
Q1.ThinkingaboutRoev.Wade,thelandmarkSupremeCourtdecisionthatrecognizedtherighttochoosetohaveanabortion,doyousupportoropposethisdecision?
RespondentsPercentageSupportRoev.Wade94562%OpposeRoev.Wade58738%
Q2.AnewpieceoflegislationcalledtheWomen'sEqualityAgendaaimstoprotectRoev.WadeinNewYork,ensureequalpayforwomenandprotectvictimsofdomesticviolence.Ifyoursenatorvotesagainstthisnewlaw,wouldyoubemorelikelyorlesslikelytovoteforthatsenatorinthenextelection?
RespondentsPercentageMorelikelytovote29724%Lesslikelytovote91976%
Methodology
ThissurveywasconductedonJune7,2013usingIVRtechnology.Weattemptedtoreacharandomizedlistofapproximately25,000registeredvotersinthe6
th
District.Theresultswereweightedbypartybasedonregistration.
 
 
Andrew Sharp Consulting · 2942 N. Hermitage Ave., Chicago, IL 60657 · (773) 327-1796
SD42–Sen.Bonacic
Thefollowingresultsarefromasurveyconductedamongregisteredvotersinthe42
nd
StateSenateDistrictofNewYork.
Q1.ThinkingaboutRoev.Wade,thelandmarkSupremeCourtdecisionthatrecognizedtherighttochoosetohaveanabortion,doyousupportoropposethisdecision?
RespondentsPercentageSupportRoev.Wade89367%OpposeRoev.Wade43033%
Q2.AnewpieceoflegislationcalledtheWomen'sEqualityAgendaaimstoprotectRoev.WadeinNewYork,ensureequalpayforwomenandprotectvictimsofdomesticviolence.Ifyoursenatorvotesagainstthisnewlaw,wouldyoubemorelikelyorlesslikelytovoteforthatsenatorinthenextelection?
RespondentsPercentageMorelikelytovote24322%Lesslikelytovote87978%
Methodology
ThissurveywasconductedonJune7,2013usingIVRtechnology.Weattemptedtoreacharandomizedlistofapproximately25,000registeredvotersinthe42
nd
District.Theresultswereweightedbypartybasedonregistration.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->