Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
13Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
13-06-11 ITC Staff Brief in Apple-Samsung Case

13-06-11 ITC Staff Brief in Apple-Samsung Case

Ratings: (0)|Views: 68,968 |Likes:
Published by Florian Mueller
June 11, 2013 brief by the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII, "ITC staff") in the investigation of Apple's complaint against Samsung (inv. no. 337-TA-796)
June 11, 2013 brief by the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII, "ITC staff") in the investigation of Apple's complaint against Samsung (inv. no. 337-TA-796)

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Florian Mueller on Jun 13, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/10/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.In the Matter of CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DIGITALMEDIA DEVICES AND COMPONENTSTHEREOFInv. No. 337-TA-796BRIEF OF THE OFFICE OF UNFAIR IMPORT INVESTIGATIONSON THE ISSUES UNDER REVIEW AND ON REMEDY, BONDING, AND PUBLICINTEREST
Anne Goalwin, Acting Director David O. Lloyd, Supervisory AttorneyReginald D. Lucas, Investigative Attorney
OFFICE OF UNFAIR IMPORTINVESTIGATIONS
U.S. International Trade Commission500 E Street SW, Suite 401Washington, DC 20436(202) 205-2036 (Phone)(202) 205-2158 (Facsimile)June 11, 2013
PUBLIC VERSIONPUBLIC VERSION
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1II. BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1A. Technical Issues on Review .................................................................................. 41. Question 1 ........................................................................................................ 42. Question 2 ........................................................................................................ 73. Question 3 ........................................................................................................ 94. Question 4 ...................................................................................................... 125. Question 5 ...................................................................................................... 136. Question 6 ...................................................................................................... 147. Question 7 ...................................................................................................... 148. Question 8 179. Question 9 ...................................................................................................... 2010. Question 10 .................................................................................................... 22B. REMEDY, THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND BONDING ................................. 241. Remedy .......................................................................................................... 24a. Limited Exclusion Order .................................................................... 24 b. Cease and Desist Order ...................................................................... 262. The Public Interest ......................................................................................... 27a. Question 1 ........................................................................................... 27 b. Question 2 ........................................................................................... 293. Bonding ......................................................................................................... 30
 
PUBLIC VERSIONPUBLIC VERSION
 
 
1
I.
 
INTRODUCTION
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”) respectfully submits this brief  pursuant to the Notice of Commission Decision of May 28, 2013 to Review a Remand InitialDetermination; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on Certain Issues Under Review and onRemedy, Bonding, and the Public Interest (“Notice”). The Commission has determined toreview the Remand Initial Determination in its entirety. (
See
 Notice at 3.) The Commission hasinvited the parties to brief certain issues under review pertaining to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,479,949,RE41,922, and 7,789,697. (
See
 Notice at 3-4.) The Commission has also expressed an interestin receiving written submissions that address the public interest factors in the context of thisinvestigation, including the effect on the public interest of remedial orders barring the entry and further distribution of the articles alleged to infringe the asserted patent claims and manners inwhich a remedy with respect to infringement be specifically tailored to avoid harm to the publicinterest. (
See
 Notice at 4-5.) OUII’s position as to each of these issues is set forth below.
II.
 
BACKGROUNDA.
 
Procedural History
On July 5, 2011, Complainant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) filed a complaint with theCommission pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §1337. The complaint named Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America,Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) asRespondents and asserted claims 1, 3-6, and 9-20 of the ‘949 patent; claims 29-35 of the ‘922 patent; claims 1-3, 11-16, and 21-27 of the ‘697 patent; claims 1-4 and 8 of the ‘501 patent;and claims 1, 4, 7, 9, 11, 12, 15-17, 19, and 20 of the ‘533 patent, as well as the claim of the
PUBLIC VERSIONPUBLIC VERSION

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->