• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 2
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
IN
THE
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
THE
FLORIDA BAR,ComplainantCase No.: SC05-1149
L.T.
Case No.: 2004-10,132(6A)
v.
MARK A. AIIAMS,Respondent.
1
RESPONDENT'S RENEWED MOTION TOENFORCE DUTIES OF CLERK
AND
TO REQUIRECOMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES OF PROCEDUREAPPLICABLE TO THIS DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
COMES
NOW,
the Respondent,
MARK
A. AIIAMS, Esquire and files theRespondent's Renewed Motion to Enforce Duties of Clerk and to RequireCompliance with the Rules of Procedure Applicable to this DisciplinaryProceeding showing:
Statement
of
Facts
1. On February 15,2006, the Report of Referee (hereinafter referred to as theReport) was entered and served via U.S. Mail to the Respondent.
2.
On
April 21,2006, the Respondent filed the Respondent's Petition forReview of Report of Referee (hereinafter referred to
as
the Respondent'sPetition for Review).
This
petition commenced the proceedings for review
 
of the disciplinary proceedings in this action pursuant to Rule 3-7.7(c)(l) ofthe Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.3.On May
1,2006,
the Respondent served his Directions to the Clerk and senta letter to Jodi
A.
Thompson, Assistant Staff Counsel for the Florida
Bar,
requesting preparation of the index to the record of the proceedings beforethe referee, requesting incorporation in the record and its index of thedocuments requested in the Directions to the Clerk, requesting service ofcopies of all documents which have been filed in this action by counsel forthe Florida
Bar
that have not been previously senred, and indicating that
an
extension of time would be requested to allow thirty days to prepare theRespondent's brief once the index was served. Please see the Respondent'sDirections to the Clerk
in
Appendix A and the Respondent's letter to Ms.Thompson in Appendix
B.
4.
On
May
15,2006,
the Florida Bar filed the letter from Jodi
A.
Thompson,Assistant Staff Counsel for the Florida Bar, to the Respondent as its response
to
the Respondent's Directions to the Clerk. Please see Appendix C. Ms.Thompson's letter states, "the
Bar
Rules do not require the record ofproceedings to be numbered." However, Ms. Thompson provides nocitation to authority to support this position. In addition, Ms. Thompson's
 
letter states that Judge Holder did not transmit the record to the Bar and thatthe Respondent should contact the Clerk of this Court regarding the record.
5.
On May 15,2006, the Respondent's Motion to Enforce Duties of Clerk
and
Motion to Enlarge Page Limits of Brief were filed with the Clerk of thisCourt, and on May 16,2006, the Clerk of this Court issued an order denyingthe same without
any
response to the same being filed by the Florida
Bar.
6.
As a result of the unusual nature and rapidity of the foregoing decision andthe Respondent's previous experiences with the Clerk of the Second DistrictCourt of Appeal of Florida issuing orders without the concurrence of twojudges as required by Article
V,
5
4(a) of the Constitution of the State ofFlorida and Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.040(a)(l),' theRespondent visited the office of the Clerk of
this
Court to review this casefile on June 14,2006, and when the Clerk refused to allow the Respondentto inspect the justices' notes in the red folder in this case file, theRespondent filed a letter requesting that he be allowed to inspect the entirecase file.
7.
On
June 14,2006, the Respondent found that the case file provided forreview by the Clerk of this Court did not contain all of the documents
'
The Clerk of the Second District Court of Appeal of Florida has also issued anorder concerning the Respondent which was contrary to the judges' directions asshown by the exhibits filed in this action.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
markadamsjdmba

By the way, I was prosecuted to cover up election fraud and judicial corruption in Florida. For more on that, see “Justice” in Florida’s Supreme Court!?! at http://blip.tv/file/1339250 and don’t miss the links below the video.

reply05 / 25 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

Naturally, the connected attorneys and those who do their bidding get away with their crimes. For examples, see FDLE's Letter to the Florida Bar and my Letter to the Inspector General for the Florida Attorney General's Office 08 10 10

05 / 25 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

If you want to know why the justice system is dominated by kangaroo courts, see Why Does the Government Ignore Our Wishes? at http://dailycensored.com/2009/09/11/w... and don’t miss my 18 minute speech.

reply05 / 25 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

If you take a look, you’ll learn why those in power and those who can influence them get away with violating our rights, abusing their power, and committing horrible crimes. My article on torture includes a link to the U.S. Supreme Court case which explains how one of our stolen rights makes the difference between justice and injustice, between freedom and slavery.

05 / 25 / 2010
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...