• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • 2
    CommentGo Back
Download
 
IN
THE
SUPREME
COURT OF FLORIDA
THE
FLORIDA BAR,ComplainantCase No.:
SC05-1149
L.T.
Case No.: 2004-10,132(6A)
MARK
A.
ADAMS,Respondent.
/
RESPONDENT'S VERIFIEDTHIRD MOTION TO CORRECT THE DOCKET AND EMERGENCYMOTION TO
GRANT
RELIEF
REQUESTED
IN
THE
RESPONDENT'SVERIFIED MOTION TO VACATE ORDER ENTERED ON JULY
12,2007
DISBARRING
THE
RESPONDENT WHICH HGS NOT BEEN TIMELYOPPOSED
BY
THE
FLORIDA
BAR
COMES NOW, the Respondent,
MARK
A.
ADAMS,
Esquire
and
files theRespondent's Verified Third Motion
to
Correct the Docket and Emergency Motionto Grant Relief Requested in the Respondent's Verified Motion to Vacate OrderEntered on July 12,2007
Disbarring
the Respondent Which Has Not Been TimelyOpposed by the Florida Bar showing:1. Rule
3-7.7
of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar provides the procedurefor review of reports and judgments entered by
a
referee
in
disciplinaryproceedings.
2.
Pursuant to Rule 3-7.7(f), the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure apply topetitions for review of disciplinary proceedings before the Supreme Court of
 
Florida, and the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar do not provide that FloridaRules of Appellate Procedure 9.300 or 9.330 do not apply in disciplinaryproceedings nor do the Bar Rules contain provisions which modify theseAppellate Rules which are applicable to this motion.3.Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a) provides that a motion forrehearing may be filed within
15
days of an order, and the pertinent part ofRule 9.330(a) states, "A motion for rehearing shall state with particularitythe points of law or fact that, in the opinion of the movant, the court hasoverlooked or misapprehended in its decision..
.
."
4.
On
July, 12,2007, the Clerk of this Court issued
an
order denying theRespondent's Motion for Clarification of this Court's Order entered on May14,2007, an order denying the Respondent's Motion to Correct the Docket,
an
order denying the Respondent's Motion to Toll Time to File Brief, and anorder dismissing the Respondent's Petition for Review, and the Clerk of thisCourt served these four orders to the Respondent via
U.S.
Mail. No otherorder entered on July 12,2007 was served to the Respondent by the Clerk ofthis Court or received by the Respondent.
5.
On
July 27,2007, the Respondent traveled for over ten hours to file theRespondent's Motion for Rehearing of Order Entered on July 12,2007Dismissing the Respondent's Petition for Review, the Respondent's Second
 
Motion to Correct the Docket, and the Respondent's Motion to Toll Time toFile Brief and to review the case file.
6.
When the Respondent reviewed the case file on July 27,2007, he learnedthat the Clerk of this Court had entered a
fifth
order on July 12,2007 whichindicated that the Respondent was permanently disbarred and whichprovided that a motion for rehearing shall not delay the effective date of thisorder.' This order was only signed by the Clerk of this Court and theDeputy Clerk refksed to provide any document showing that this order wasauthorized by the required number of Justices or the names of the Justiceswho authorized this order.7. On
July
27,2007, the Respondent also learned that the documents which hadbeen stored in the sub-basement had been put back together with the file,although it was not clear when such action was taken, but most importantly,the Respondent learned that a number of exhibits which he submitted to thereferee, Gregory
P.
Holder, were missing from the file and also not
'
The Respondent does not know the exact language used in this order as theRespondent was not served with a copy and has not received one, and although theRespondent informed the Deputy Clerk that he had not received a copy of thisorder and requested one, the Deputy Clerkrefised to provide one to theRespondent without charging a fee for the same.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
markadamsjdmba

By the way, the Florida Bar came after me to cover up election fraud and judicial corruption in Florida. For more on that, see “Justice” in Florida’s Supreme Court!?! at http://blip.tv/file/1339250 and don’t miss the links below the video.

reply08 / 14 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

I was also criminally prosecuted without any legal basis. See my Answer Brief However, the connected attorneys and those who do their bidding get away with their crimes. For examples, see the FDLE's Letter to the Florida Bar and my Letter to the Inspector General for the Florida Attorney General's Office

08 / 14 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

If you want to know why the justice system is dominated by kangaroo courts, see Why Does the Government Ignore Our Wishes? at http://dailycensored.com/2009/09/11/w... and don’t miss my short speech.

reply08 / 14 / 2010
markadamsjdmba

If you take a look, you’ll learn why those in power and those who can improperly influence them get away with violating our rights, abusing their power, and committing horrible crimes. My article on torture includes a link to the U.S. Supreme Court case which explains how one of our stolen rights makes the difference between justice and injustice, between freedom and slavery.

08 / 14 / 2010
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...