Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Transportation for America 2013 Bridge Report

Transportation for America 2013 Bridge Report

Ratings: (0)|Views: 106|Likes:
Published by Statesman Journal
Transportation for America 2013 Bridge Report
Transportation for America 2013 Bridge Report

More info:

Published by: Statesman Journal on Jun 18, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/19/2013

pdf

text

original

 
The Fix We’re In For:
 The State of OurNation’s Bridges
2013
TRANSPORTATION FOR AMERICA 
Creativ
e Commons photo of the I-5 Skagit River bridge by Flickr user WSDOT http://www.ickr.com/photos/wsdot
 
2
Not surprisingly, age takes a toll. Structurally decient
bridges are
65 years old
on average — more than
22 years older
than all bridges. Herein lies a glimpse of 
the future x we’re in for: In just 10 years,
one in fourbridges (170,000) will be over 65
, an age at which it’s
far more likely that a bridge will be decient.Bridges may be rated decient for a range of reasons
and not all of them pose an immediate threat to publicEvery day, milliions of people from all walks of life incities and towns large and small travel over one of our country’s
66,405
structurally decient bridges
— more than one in nine (
11 percent
) of all bridges.
Structurally decient bridges are those thatrequire signicant maintenance, rehabilitation orreplacement.
We take
260 million trips
over decient bridges eachday. Just in our 100 largest metropolitan areas, thereare more structurally decient bridges than there are
McDonald’s restaurants in the entire country. Laid
end to end, all the decient bridges would span from
Washington, DC to Denver, Colorado — more than
1,500 miles
. (Or farther than from Canada to Mexico.)While most bridges are designed to last 50 years beforemajor overhaul or replacement, the average age of an
 American bridge is well past middle age at
43 years
.
One in nine bridges remains structurally decient
 About this data
 This report is derived from the National Bridge Inventory, a compliation of state-collected data, which is reported
to and then published by the Federal Highway Administration. This data was released in early 2013 and was re
-
ported to the FHWA at different times by states in 2012. It’s perhaps most helpful to think of the NBI dataset as asummary of bridge conditions during a period of time, not a single specic single moment. States report their datato FHWA at different points during 2012, and repairs may have been made in the many months between their
reporting date and the release of the FHWA dataset. States have the most up-to-date bridge data, but this is thesole complete national source of bridge data.
 
THE STATE OF OUR NATION’S BRIDGES
3
The Fix We’re In For:The State of our Nation’s Bridges
2013T4 AMERICA 
safety. However, allowing bridges to remain in seriousneed of repair can lead to the sudden closure of acritical transportation link or, far worse, a collapse that
results in lost lives and a major economic impact to the
affected region.
Considering declining gas tax revenues for
transportation and other budget woes, securing themoney to repair or replace thousands of bridges, while
xing the other parts of our aging highway and transit
networks, is a critical national issue. The maintenancebacklog will only grow as bridges age and costs rise. The Federal Highway Administration estimates that
repairing our decient bridges would cost a staggering$76 billion. This gure will likely increase as many of our
most heavily traveled bridges – including those built
more than 40 years ago as part of the Interstate system– near the end of their expected lifespan.
Meanwhile, Congress last year introduced a wild card
into the mix by passing legislation that
eliminated a
dedicated fund for bridge repair
in the renewal of 
the federal transportation program, known as MAP-21.
Instead, states are directed to set standards that they
expect to meet for repair, but with limited enforcement
in case of failure. The upshot is that bridge repairnow must compete with other transportation needs. At the same time, the new law reduced access to
funds for the nearly 90 percent of structurally decient
bridges that are not part of the so-called National
What does “structurally decient”
mean?
Highway bridges have three primary compo-
nents: 1)
the deck
, which is the top surface of the bridge that cars, trucks and people cross;2)
the superstructure
, which supports thedeck; and 2)
the substructure
, which uses theground to support the superstructure. Each of 
these bridge features is given a rating between 0
and 9 when inspected, with 9 signifying the bestcondition. Federal guidelines classify bridges
as “structurally decient” if one of the three key
components is rated at 4 or less (poor or worse),
meaning engineers have identied a major defect
in its support structure or its deck. (There area handful of other criteria that can result in a
decient grade, but for the majority of decient
bridges, one of these three primary componentsrates a 4 or below.) Federal law requires states
to inspect all bridges 20 feet or longer at least
every two years, though states typically inspect
structurally decient bridges far more often.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->