Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
District Reconfiguration Analysis (2)

District Reconfiguration Analysis (2)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 483|Likes:
Published by NC Policy Watch
Source: N.C. Administrative Office of the Courts
Source: N.C. Administrative Office of the Courts

More info:

Published by: NC Policy Watch on Jun 20, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/20/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Superior Court Judges - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula
Based on Data through 6/30/2012
Division 1Division 2
 Judge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE) Judge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)
12.32.03B1.73.021.71.04A1.51.03A2.02.04B1.61.06A 1.01.052.93.06B1.11.08A1.31.07A1.31.08B1.41.07B2.22.0Division Total10.4-10.0=0.4Division Total11.6-10.0=1.6
Division 3Division 4
 Judge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE) Judge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)
92.32.011A1.41.09A0.91.011B1.31.0107.76.0123.64.0143.14.013A1.61.015A1.52.013B1.41.015B1.22.016A2.52.0Division Total16.7-17.0=No need16B2.12.019D1.01.0Division Total14.9-13.0=1.9
Division 5Division 6
udge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)udge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)
17A1.02.019A1.91.017B1.22.019C1.51.0186.65.020A0.91.019B1.51.020B2.02.0212.44.022A1.92.0231.11.022B1.72.0Division Total13.8-15.0=No NeedDivision Total9.9-9.0=0.9
Division 7Division 8
udge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)udge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)
25A1.72.0241.32.025B1.52.0282.22.02610.97.029A1.31.027A2.82.029B1.11.027B2.12.030A1.01.0Division Total19.0-15.0=4.030B0.91.0Division Total7.8-8.0=No need
Updated to reflect the Burr amendment --If reconfigured per 6/12/2013 request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly:Combine Districts 6A and 6B for Prosecutorial and District Court; Newly configured 16A contains Scotland, Hoke,Richmond, and Anson Counties for Superior and District Court; Newly created Prosecutorial District 16C containsRichmond and Anson Counties; Newly configured 20A contains Stanly County for Superior Court, District Court,and Prosecutorial District; SC 19D to 4th Division.. Affected districts highlighted
DistrictDistricDistrictDistricDistrict District District District 
 The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the FiscalResearch Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.
 
Superior Court Judges - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula
Based on Data through 6/30/2012
Business Court
 Judge Need (FTE)Resident  Judges=Special Judge  Need (FTE)
1.00.01.00.01.00.0BC Total3.0-0.0=3.0
Business Court 
 The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the FiscalResearch Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.
 
District Court Judges - Needed as of July 1, 2012, Based on Workload Formula
Ranked from best off to worst off Based on Data through 6302012
District Judges Authorized7/1/2012Unrounded JudgesNeededStaff to WorkloadRatio243.59111.55%27B65.60107.06%154.70106.41%2443.76106.32%9/9B65.88102.04%598.84101.85%111111.0399.70%17B44.0499.03%22B66.0698.99%27A77.2995.98%3066.2895.59%3B66.2995.35%777.3695.10%16A66.3195.09%6A/B44.2394.55%15B55.3493.58%1477.7190.76%2877.8589.15%262123.7188.59%3A55.6688.33%20A22.2788.11%866.8887.19%101921.7987.18%19C55.7986.32%17A33.4985.85%29B44.7184.98%1367.1084.50%15A44.7584.21%20B44.8183.18%25910.8982.63%2344.8981.85%181417.1381.71%19B78.9278.48%9A22.5678.00%29A33.9476.19%16B56.6575.18%4810.6675.02%121013.7872.56%211013.9971.46%19A45.8268.71%22A57.2968.59% Total270309.67
Updated to reflect Burr amendment FTE allocation ---If reconfigured per 6/12/2013 request from the Fiscal Research Division of the General Assembly:Combine Districts 6A and 6B for Prosecutorial and District Court; Newly configured 16A containsScotland, Hoke, Richmond, and Anson Counties for Superior and District Court; Newly createdProsecutorial District 16C contains Richmond and Anson Counties; Newly configured 20A containsStanly County for Superior Court, District Court, and Prosecutorial District; SC 19D to 4th Division. Affected districts highlighted
If the allocation of a new district courtjudgeship were to be based on workloadneed, it would be created in District 22Aor District 19A instead of in District 27B.
 The North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts has provided this data in response to a specific request from the FiscalResearch Division of the General Assembly, and takes no position on the configuration of districts as proposed.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->