QUIZ

1. Who must inform the arrested person of his Miranda Rights?

A. B. C. D. Arresting Officer His Counsel Judge Prosecutor

2. In Stonehill VS. Diokno, those things seized in the offices of the corporation were considered invalid.
A. True B. False

3. How many search warrants were issued by the respondent-judges against the petitioners in the Stonehill VS. Diokno Case? A. 40 B. 41 C. 42 D. 43

4. Who among the persons listed below is not included in the immediate family that may visit an arrested person?
A. B. C. D. Father of arrested person Daughter of arrested person Brother of the father of the arrested person Cousin of the arrested person

5. Republic Act No. 7438 is:

A.
Act Defining Certain Rights of Person Arrested, Detained or Under Custodial Investigation as well as the Duties of The Arresting, Detaining and Investigating Officers, and Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof. B. Act Defining Certain Privileges of Person Arrested, Detained or Under Custodial Investigation as well as the Duties of The Arresting, Detaining and Investigating Officers, and Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof. C. An Act To Punish Any Public Officer Or Employee Who Shall Obstruct, Prohibit, Or Otherwise Prevent The Exercise Of The Right Of Attorneys To Visit And Confer With Persons Arrested.

6. What doctrine was abandoned in the Stonehill VS. Diokno Case?

A. B. C. D. Moncadu Doctrine Moncado Doctrine Miranda Doctrine Mirinda Doctrine

7. It involves any questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.

8. _______ is any lawyer, except those directly affected by the case, charged with conducting preliminary investigation or those charged with the prosecution of crimes. Without him/ her, no custodial investigation shall be conducted.

9. ________ states that an arrested person has the rights to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel, preferably of his own choice, who shall at all times be allowed to confer privately with the person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation. If such person cannot afford the services of his own counsel, he must be provided with a competent and independent counsel by the investigating officer,

10. In the Stonehill VS. Diokno case, all the search warrants were invalidated by the Supreme Court.
A. True B. False