Iranian Nuclear Politics: The InternationalDimensions
Dr Babak Ganji
Key Points
* The nuclear policy of the Ahmadinezhad governmentshould be analysed within the framework of the grand strategy of the Iranian state which is aimed at challenging the US in thePersian Gulf and south Asia in particular.* Since the advent of the new government, cleavages withinthe Iranian state apparatus on the nuclear issue have alsochanged. The radical-conservative camp, most notably Iran’ssupreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene’i, would prefer Iran topursue industrial-scale uranium enrichment within theframework of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. There areserious differences of opinion between advocates of nuclearopacity such as Ahmad Tavakkoli, who have called for thecontinuation of talks with the International Atomic EnergyAgency, and those such as the secretary of the Supreme NationalSecurity Council Ali Larijani who seek to tighten Iran’s relations with Russia, China, India and Pakistan. In the centre right andreformist camp, some still favour talks with the EU, althoughthere have been calls for withdrawal from the NPT if the Iraniancase is referred to the UN Security Council. The Majlis,particularly the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee,is still playing an important role in the nuclear debate.* There are serious differences of opinion over grand strategy within the radical and conservative camps, usually expressed interms of the wisdom of Iranian efforts to bring Russia and Chinainto the talks. A powerful current within the state apparatus,strongly believes in self-reliance, contending that neither Russianor China will sacrifice their national interests for Iran.* The grand strategy with which Larijani was associatedcollapsed with India’s vote against Iran at the meeting of theIAEA’s board of governors. However, in the short term it is
Leave a Comment