Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity

Table Of Contents

0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Conviction Integrity Review - People v. Jesse Friedman - FINAL

Conviction Integrity Review - People v. Jesse Friedman - FINAL

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 11,159|Likes:
Published by johnd7463

More info:

Published by: johnd7463 on Jun 24, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/18/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
C
ONVICTION
I
NTEGRITY
R
EVIEW
:
 
 P
 EOPLE V 
 .
 
 J 
 ESSE
 F
 RIEDMAN 
 
C
OMMISSIONED
B
Y
:
ATHLEEN
M.
 
ICE
  N
ASSAU
C
OUNTY
D
ISTRICT
A
TTORNEY
 
C
ASE
A
DVISORY
P
ANEL
 
M
ARK 
F.
 
P
OMERANTZ
,
 
E
SQ
.
 
(C
HAIR 
)P
ATRICK 
J.
 
H
ARNETT
 S
USAN
H
ERMAN
,
 
E
SQ
.
 
B
ARRY
S
CHECK 
,
 
E
SQ
.
J
UNE
2013
 
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iI. The Investigation And Prosecution Of Arnold And Jesse Friedman............................1
A. The Friedman Family ...............................................................................................1B.
Arnold Friedman’s Computer Classes
.....................................................................21. Classroom Organization...............................................................................32. Sessions and Class Membership ..................................................................4C.
Arnold Friedman’s
Abusive History ........................................................................4D. Federal Agents Arrest Arnold Friedman for Trading in Child Pornography...........6E.
The Nassau County Investigation’s First Phase
(Pre-State Search Warrant: November 3-25, 1987) .................................................71.
The NCPD’s Investigative Team and Procedures
.......................................72. Interview
Breakdown, and the Significance of “Negative” Reports
...........93. Initial Media Coverage ..............................................................................114. Witness Interviews .....................................................................................11F.
The Nassau County Investigation’s Second Phase
(November 25-December 17, 1987) ......................................................................141. The Search Warrant and Arrests ................................................................142. Continuing Media Coverage ......................................................................163. Additional Witness Interviews ...................................................................174. The First and Second Indictments..............................................................205. Notes on the Indictments ...........................................................................22G.
Arnold Friedman’s Guilty Plea and Sentence
........................................................22H.
The Nassau County Investigation’s Third Phase (December 17,
1987, to December 20, 1988) .................................................................................241. Final Witness Interviews............................................................................242.
Summary of Statements Concerning “Sex Games”
...................................273. Police Identify Three Potential Accomplices ............................................284. Media Coverage Subsequent to the Second Indictment ............................32I. Third Indictment (Nov. 7, 1988) ............................................................................33J.
Jesse Friedman’s
Guilty Plea .................................................................................351. Spring 1988: Jesse Hires Attorney Peter Panaro .......................................362. Autumn 1988: Panaro Retains Psychologists and Other Experts ..............373. Winter 1988: Jesse Explores His Options ..................................................404. Late Winter 1988-89: Plea and Sentencing ...............................................42
 
H. 1988
 – 
2001: From Jesse Frie
dman’s Guilty Plea to Release
..................................441. Jesse Friedman Reaffirms His Guilt on National Television.....................442.
Goldstein’s Guilty Plea
..............................................................................483. Arnold Friedman Considers Trying to Vacate his Guilty Plea ..................484.
Jesse’s Prison Term
....................................................................................49
II. Commencement, Scope, And Methods Of Review ........................................................51
A.
Capturing the Friedmans
.......................................................................................51B. Post-Conviction Litigation .....................................................................................52C.
The District Attorney’s Response
..........................................................................541. Record Privacy ...........................................................................................562. Witness Outreach Protocols .......................................................................57D. Standard of Review ................................................................................................581. Reasonable Probability ..............................................................................592. Vacatur in the Interests of Justice ..............................................................59E. Evidentiary Limitations .........................................................................................61
III.
Findings Of Fact: Jesse Friedman’s Principal Claims Do Not Demonstrate
a Reasonable Probability That He Was Wrongfully Convicted ..................................63
A. Claims of Inappropriate Police Questioning Are Exaggerated ..............................641. Detective
Anthony Squeglia’s Interview
...................................................652. Other Police Accounts Demonstrate Appropriate Questioning .................673. Some Witnesses Were Interviewed on Multiple Occasions;This Was Not Universal Practice or Necessarily Improper .......................684. Early Phase I and II Interviews Were Generally Characterized by Open, Non-Leading Questioning ..........................................................705.
The “Meyers Tape” Depicts an Interview Conducted to“Close Out” the Case, Not to Charge Jesse Friedman
...............................726. The Evidence Does Not Support the Allegation that PoliceUsed the Close-Out Statement to Generate Charges AgainstJesse Friedman ...........................................................................................737. Not All Suspects Were Prosecuted ............................................................758. Modern Best Practices ...............................................................................75B. The Review Team Found No Credible Evidence that Hypnosis WasUsed on Any Complainant .....................................................................................771. Doctors Denied That Hypnosis Elicited Charges ......................................782. The Only Witness Account to Describe Hypnosis Is Not Reliable ...........783. Nothing Else Suggests That Hypnosis Was Ever Used .............................79

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->