The Messenger 127
– March 007
Editorial
The Organisation
Catherine Cesarsky
(ESO Director General) The birth o the European ELT At ESO, we will all remember 006 as theyear o the birth o the E-ELT (Europe-an Extremely Large Telescope). The ges-tation period has been quite long. Astron-omers have been discussing or manyyears the wondrous scientic programmesthey hoped to conduct with an ELT. I re-member the enthusiasm o scientists whogathered in the rst workshops organisedby OPTICON, in Edinburgh in 000, ol-lowed by the two-week-long Leiden meet-ing in 001. These were ollowed by anumber o meetings and workshops, oneo them in conjunction with “Exploring thecosmic rontier”, in Berlin in May 004,which pregured the science vision dis-cussions our community is now havingin the ramework o ASTRONET. An im-portant point about these discussions isthat many o them were shared with ourcolleagues rom across the Atlantic. Aworldwide meeting took place as an IAUSymposium, in Cape Town in November005. Also in 005, under the leadershipo Isobel Hook, the rst European ELTscience case appeared, in the orm o ashort and well-illustrated documentgeared to decision makers ollowed by alengthy volume or astronomers.In parallel, studies o telescope con-cepts were pursued. At ESO, it was allstarted in the second hal o the 1990sby Roberto Gilmozzi challenging the engi-neers to create a concept or a 100-mtelescope. This prompted work rom ouropticians to devise ways o sharpen-ing the blurred images that would be ob-tained with a spherical primary mirror,as it appeared that this simple and rela-tively inexpensive shape would be a re-quisite or such a mammoth telescope tobe easible. The mechanical engineerslooked into nding ways o constructinglarge structures with the required sti-ness, yet still relatively light and inexpen-sive to be produced by using many simi-lar pieces (the Lego model). Meanwhile,the ESO Adaptive Optics (AO) special-ists, in collaboration with European col-leagues, while still delivering all the de-vices necessary or VLT and VLTI, weremethodically investigating more andmore advanced schemes, necessary oran ELT. The OWL studies at ESO were ora long time one o the lowest prioritiesin our programme, as at that time Coun-cil asked us to concentrate our eortson completing the Paranal Observatoryand on starting the ALMA construction. The situation was completely changedwhen in December 004, Council, adopt-ing the recommendation by the Coun-cil Science Strategy WG chaired by Ral Bender, announced the now amousresolution which, at last, gave ELT studiesa high priority within the Organisation.In 005, while the rst complete ScienceCase was being completed, at ESO allthe work perormed on the OWL conceptwas written up. Another very impor-tant activity in 005, organised by SandroD’Odorico in a broad cooperation withthe community, was to provide instru-mentation concepts or OWL. Finally, theFP6 ELT Design Study was started bya European-wide consortium led by ESO,aimed at evaluating critical technologiesneeded to build a giant telescope.By the end o 005, ollowing the OWLreview, we decided at ESO to reorientthe ELT eort towards the best aordableELT acility, with a diameter rom 30 to60 m that could be built on a competitivetimescale and with acceptable risks,with strong involvement o the communi-ty. I had great condence in the ESOsta, which I knew was well prepared todesign an ELT, and in the community,which had shown prowess in developingtelescope concepts, various aspectso adaptive optics and in instrumentationdesign. In the last week o December005, I solicited 88 astronomers andengineers rom the community and ESO,to participate in ve working groups (Sci-ence, AO, Instruments, Telescope designand Site evaluation), to elaborate withintwo months a ‘toolbox’, a compendium o the relevant knowledge or designingan ELT, including trade-os and prioritisa-tion criteria. I was extremely pleased tosee that almost all accepted readily. Theyrose to the challenge, and provided mewith an excellent document that was astarting point towards the very ambitiousgoal I had set: to present the conceptstudy o the E-ELT to Council or Phase Bapproval in December o 006. Soon a-ter, the chairs and co-chairs o the WG’scame together in the ELT Science andEngineering WG (ESE), chaired by DanielEnard, and provided the E-ELT basicrequirements: a multipurpose telescopeand instrumentation which was ‘laserguide star riendly’ and ast in switching. Adaptive Optics was to be integrated inthe telescope. The diameter, 4 m, wasconsidered by the committees as a goodstarting compromise between ambi-tious scientic goals and schedule, costand risk. The design principles are described inthe article by Roberto Gilmozzi andJason Spyromilio in this issue (page 11). Ihad high expectations, but these weremuch surpassed when I was presentedwith the novel ve-mirror design, whichcorresponds to all ESE requirements andnot only provides excellent image qualityacross the eld o view but also improvesperormance and reduces risk by sepa-rating the unctions o eld stabilisationrom those o AO. Other attractive ea-tures are that it is cheaper than a classi-cal telescope, is aster to build and thuscan be timely, and is upgradeable at areasonable cost.First our advisory committees (in thiscase, ESE and STC, and the Council ELT Advisory Committee ESRC), then ourcommunity, at a historic meeting at theend o November in Marseilles (see themeeting report on page 0), and nallyCouncil on 6 December 006, were con-vinced by this novel design, leaving itto the ESO E-ELT Project Oce to under-take a Phase B study with the commu-nity and industry. The real work is start-ing now!Spain has joined ESOOn 14 February 007, I was notied bythe French Council delegate, Mr. JulienGalabru, that Spain had deposited theinstrument o accession to ESO in thearchives o the French Ministry o Foreign Aairs. This was the last ormal step re-quired or Spain to become the 1th ESOMember State, and it appropriately hap-pened on Valentine’s day, a good omenor the uture.In act, Council and the Spanish negotiat-ing team, then headed by Carlos Alejaldre