Team 5QuestionsforDirector Mueller
Watchlisting
and
Information
Sharing
-^-""^X
/-'"'
1.
Pre-9-11watchlist.
Why did theF^Hno>iravea writte^sppHcy^9flwatchlisting of
tlsTIPOFF
uspected terrorists
before
Septsystem?
2.
FBI watchlist procedures.
What is the FBI doing
differently
today to ensure that
known
orsuspected terrorists
~
including thosewho are thesubjectof or areference
in an
international terrorism investigation
- are
included
in
terroristwatchlists administered by
TTIC's
Terrorist Identities Group and the TerroristScreening Center
(TSC)?
3.
FBI watchlist point person.
Who at the FBI is inchargeofwatchlisting known
or
suspected terrorists, and is responsible for ensuring that the FBI policy isimplemented?
4.The Paris
incident.
Over the Christmas holiday a flight from Paris was cancelleddue to concerns about watchlisted individuals, whom the French government hasindicated were
not a
threat, including
a
Tunisian minor.
Affarjjgp..
1^__
responsibility
for
w^trhlkt
^terminations
passed
from the
Department
of
State
to,
the
Terrorist Screening Center,
pursuant
tn
a
Presidential directive.
•
It
is
our
understanding that
the
Terrorist Screening Center
was not
consultedwith regard to the watchlisted individuals and that these decisions were made
by
the DHS National Targeting Center in consultation with the FBI National
Joint
Terrorism Task Force, located
at FBI
headquarters. Would
you
clarify
the
facts
and
tell
us
why^wasiffitEe
TSC)consulted?
•
What changes
are now in
place
to
make sure they will
be
consulted
in the
future?
$
ff-
NV
YO
5.
DHS
role.
The
Presidential directive leaves open where
the TSC
should reside
ill
the long term. Currently, the Director of the TSC reports to you and the TSC
is
housed
in
FBI.
_
• In
your view, should
the TSC be
housed
in the FBI or in
DHS?
''
"
^
las
6.
Travel document
information-sJt&
ability to
share
informationTf'
J
h
7.
the
U.S.
-
for
example, physical
e
places -- with the CIA?are there on the FBI's
iwn
or
suspected terrorists
in
arches
of persons or
Condor.
It is our understanding that 125,000 Condor name checks have been
performed
by the FBI since January 2002, and that no individual has been denieda visa based on any of these name checks. Inasmuch as these name checks
often
result
in
significant
delays
in
visa processing,
for no
apparent benefit, shouldn't
the
Condor programbescrappedandreplacedbyterrorist screening doneby theTSC?
Leave a Comment