Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Mohsenzadeh v. Rea

Mohsenzadeh v. Rea

Ratings: (0)|Views: 86 |Likes:
Published by PriorSmart
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00803-CMH-JFA: Mohsenzadeh v. Rea. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. Claude M. Hilton presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8EE for more info.
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00803-CMH-JFA: Mohsenzadeh v. Rea. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. Claude M. Hilton presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8EE for more info.

More info:

Published by: PriorSmart on Jul 01, 2013
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/19/2013

pdf

text

original

 
FILED
INTHE
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURTFORTHEEASTERNDISTRICT
OF
VIRGINIA
Alexandria
Division
2013
JUN
28P
35
HOSSEIN
MOHSENZADEH
30RevereBeachParkway
Medford,
MA
02155
Plaintiff,
HON.
TERESASTANEKREA
ActingUnderSecretary
of
Commerce
for
Intellectual
PropertyandDirector
of
theUnitedStates
PatentandTrademark
OfficeOffice
of
theGeneralCounsel
UnitedStatesPatent
andTrademarkOffice
P.O.
Box
1450,Arlington,VA22313
MadisonBuildingEast,Room10B20
600DulanyStreet,Alexandria,
VA
22314
Defendant.
CLERK
US
DISTRICT
COURT
ALEXANDRIA.
VIRGINIA
CivilAction
No.
i;
13CV
£>Q3
chh/ctpA
COMPLAINT
PlaintiffHosseinMohsenzadeh("Plaintiffor"Mr.Mohsenzadeh"),forhisComplaintagainstDefendant,theHonorableTeresaStanekRea("Defendant"),respectfullystatesas
follows:
1.ThisisanactionbyMr.Mohsenzadeh,theassigneeandowner
of
UnitedStates
PatentNo.8,346,659("the'659patent"),seekingreviewofinaccurateanderroneouspatentterm
adjustmentcalculationsmadebytheUnitedStatesPatent&TrademarkOffice("PTO").
Specifically,thisisanactionbyMr.Mohsenzadehunder35U.S.C.§154(b)(4)(A)seekingajudgmentthatthepatenttermadjustmentforthe'659patentbechangedfrom1,560daysto
2,783days.
 
2.Thisactionarises
under
35U.S.C.§
154
andthe
AdministrativeProcedure
Act,5
U.S.C.
§§
701-706.
THEPARTIES
3.PlaintiffHosseinMohsenzadehisanindividualwithaprimaryresidenceat30
RevereBeachParkway,Medford,
MA
02155.4.DefendantHonorableTeresaStanek
Rea
isbothActingUnderSecretary
of
CommerceforIntellectualPropertyandDirector
of
theUnitedStatesPatentandTrademark
Office,andissuedhereinherofficialcapacity.
JURISDICTION
AND
VENUE
5.ThisCourthasjurisdictionoverthisactionandisauthorizedtoissuetherequestedreliefsought
by
Plaintiffpursuantto28U.S.C.
§§1331,
1338(a)and1361;35U.S.C.
§
154(b)(4)(A)
and
5
U.S.C.
§§
701-706.
6.Venueisproperinthisdistrictpursuantto35U.S.C.§154(b)(4)(A).
7.ThisComplaintistimelyfiledinaccordancewith35U.S.C.§154(b)(4)(A).
BACKGROUND
8.Plaintiffistheassignee
of
allright,titleandinterestinthe'659patent,atrueand
correctcopy
of
whichisattachedheretoasExhibitA.9.The
'659
patent
was
dulyissuedonJanuary1,2013,andisbasedonU.S.PatentApplicationNo.10/375,501,filedonFebruary26,2003.
10.The
'659
patentisnotsubjecttoaterminaldisclaimer.11.Under35U.S.C.§154(b)(1),thePTOcalculatespatenttermadjustment("PTA")
inthefollowingmanner:(A)an"A-clause,"whichawardsPTAfordelaysarisingwhenthe
PTO
failstoactbycertainexaminationdeadlines;(B)a"B-clause,"whichawards
PTA
for
applicationpendencyexceedingthreeyears;and(C)a"C-clause,"whichawardsPTAfordelays
2
 
duetointerferences,secrecyorders,andappeals.The
PTO
calculates
PTA
byaddingtheA-C
Delays,andsubtractinganyoverlappingdays,andanydaysattributabletoapplicantdelay.12.ThePTOawardedthe'659patent1,421daysforADelaysand1,278daysforB
Delays.ThePTOcalculatedatotal
of
389daysforApplicantDelay,andfoundthattherewere
750days
of
overlappingAandBDelays.Thus,subtractingtheApplicantDelayfromthenon-
overlappingPTOdelays,thePTOoriginallyawardedthe'659patent1,560days
of
patentterm
adjustmentunder35U.S.C.§154(b),asisreflectedontheface
of
thepatent.Atrueandcorrect
copy
of
the
PTOPTA
DeterminationisattachedheretoasExhibitB.
13.WhenthePTOissuedthe'659patentonJanuary
1,2013,
iterroneouslycalculatedthepatenttermadjustmentforthe
'659
patentas1,560days.HadthePTOcalculated
thepatenttermadjustmentproperly,the'659patentwouldbeentitledtonolessthan2,783days
of
patenttermadjustment.
14.35U.S.C.§154(b)(1)(B),entitled"Guarantee
of
nomorethan3-yearapplication
pendency,"providesforanextension
of
oneday
of
patenttermforeachdayfollowingthree
yearsfromtheactualfilingdateofapatentapplication,untilthepatentissues.Thisprovision
applies
"if
theissue
of
anoriginalpatentisdelayedduetothefailure
of
theUnitedStatesPatent
andTrademarkOfficetoissueapatentwithin3yearsaftertheactualfilingdate
of
theapplicationintheUnitedStates,notincluding—(i)anytimeconsumedbycontinued
examinationoftheapplicationrequestedbytheapplicantundersection132(b)[or](ii)anytimeconsumedbyaproceedingundersection135(a),anytimeconsumedbytheimpositionofan
orderundersection181,oranytimeconsumed
by
appellatereview
by
theBoard
of
Patent
AppealsandInterferencesorbyaFederalcourt."

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->