• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
UNCLASSIFIEDCOMMISSION SENSITIVE
TEAM 7 DRAFT MONOGRAPHonCIVIL AVIATIONANDTRANSPORTATION SECURITY
Sam
BrinkleyWilliam JohnstoneJohn Raidt
UNCLASSIFIEDCOMMISSION SENSITIVE
 
DRAFT FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY DRAFT
CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY:
PRELUDE
TO
9-11Executive Summary
The
story
of how
terrorists
on
September
11,
2001 were able
to
hijack four U.S. civilianjetliners
and use
them
as
weapons
of
mass destruction against
the
American homelandbegins with fundamental questions about the status of the civil aviation security systemthat
was
supposed
to
stop them.
How did the
U.S. civil aviation security system evolve
to
achieve
its
status
as of
September
11,2001?Who was
responsible
for
setting, implementing
and
enforcing aviation securitypolicies and procedures?
What
did
civil aviation authorities perceive
to be the
security threat
to
commercialaviation, its vulnerabilities to terrorism and the consequences of a successfulattack? And what did they do about it?
Precisely what security measures were
the
hijackers required
to
defeat
in
order
to
execute their crime on September
11,
2001?
Pivotal
Incidents
and
Aviation Security
From
the
inception
of the
U.S. civil aviation system
in the
1920's
up to the
modern era,two
forms
of attack against U.S. commercial
aircraft
have remained the most urgent andconsequential
air
piracy, most commonly referred
to as
hijacking,
and
sabotage,
primarily in the
form
of
bombing.
The
national system
for
protecting passengers,
aircraft
and
airports
from
attack
was
neithercreated nor developed by policy makers in anticipation of criminal and terroristintentions, but rather in reaction to
major
incidents—a
phenomenon observed bynumerous public aviation commissions
and
commentators
over
the
past
25
years.
As
threats manifested themselves through successful
attacks,
including
headline,
watersheddisasters,
new
defensive measures
and
approaches were implemented
by
policy makers
seeking
to
solve
the
prevailing
"security
problem"
of the
time.
• The1955 bombingof aUnited
flight
for thepurposeof
insurance
fraud
The sabotage of this
flight
after
take-off
from
Denver,
Colorado,
killing 44, gave rise tolimits
on the
value
of
passenger insurance policies.
The
attack
was
followed three years
later
by the
hijacking
of a Cuban airliner en route
from
Havana to
Miami
1
and a series of
midair
collisions." These incidents together with "the approaching introduction
of jet
airliners spurred Congress to create an independent Federal Aviation Administration
(F
AA), extending
the
agency power
to
oversee both
the
"safety
and
security"
of
civilianaviation, as well as to
"promote"
the aviation industry.
3
In
these
early
years,
the primary
focus
of air commerce regulators was on issues of "operational safety," while the thrustDRAFT FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY DRAFT1
 
DRAFT
FOR
INTERNAL
USE
ONLY DRAFT
of
security policy
was on
enforcing generally applicable statutes against
fraud,
theft
and
assault.
• The
rash
of
aircraft hijackings
to
Cuba between 1968
and
1972
The
industry's
age of
relative innocence
was
shattered
by an
epidemic
of
hijacking
between 1968
and
1972.
Congress responded
by
passing
major
new
aviation securitylaws,
the
centerpiece
of
which
was a
requirement
that
air
carriers
submit
their passengers
to
pre-boarding checkpoint screening
in
order
to
enforce prohibitions
on the
possession
of
"deadly weapons, explosives
and
incendiaries"
aboard commercial
aircraft.
The new
body
of law
created
a
federal
regulatory
system
in
which
the FAA was
responsible
forestablishing
and
enforcing security policies
and
standards, while commercial
air
carriers
and
airports were responsible
for
carrying them out. During this period political
and
religious
conflict
in the
Middle East created
a
breeding ground
for
terrorist activity, some
of
which
in the
years
to
follow
was
aimed
at the
United States over
its
policies
in the
region.
• The
1988 downing
of Pan Am 103 by a
terrorist bomb
The Pan Am 103
disaster
shifted
the
security
focus
from
hijacking
to the
sabotage threat
as
authorities endeavored
to
develop
the
technological means
to
detect improvisedexplosive devices
(lED'S).
Laws
passed
in
response
to the
incident created
new
positions within
the FAA to
oversee security,
and
required
the FBI and FAA to
formally
assess
the
contemporary aviation threat posed
by
rogue
states
and
terrorist movements,
and
to
evaluate systemic vulnerabilities
to
their
tactics.
• The
destruction
of TWA 800
over
the
Atlantic Ocean
in
1996
This
tragedy
reinforced aircraft
sabotage
as the
major
security concern,
as
hijacking
was
perceived
to be in
check.
The
heightened concern over bombs, prompted
a
major
push
toincrease the
screening
of
checked baggage
for
explosives
(even
though
the
federal
investigation
into
the
disaster eventually concluded that
the
cause
of the
crash
was not an
explosive).
The
incident occurred
at a
time when both
the
domestic aviation securitysystem
and
U.S.
national security
complex
at
large
perceived
a rising
threat
from
the
proliferation
of
highly capable terrorist groups willing
to
target
and
maximize casualties
among
civilian populations
in
pursuit
of
extreme political
or
religious
aims—a
trend
illustrated
by the
1993
bombing
of the
World Trade Center,
the 1997
bombing
of the
Federal
building
in
Oklahoma City,
the
1998 bombings
of the
U.S. embassies
in
Africa
and the
foiled
1995 Bojinka
plot
by
Ramzi
Yousef, anAl
Qaeda
affiliate,
to
destroy
12U.S.
airliners simultaneously through coordinated bombings.
DRAFT
FOR
INTERNAL
USE
ONLY DRAFT
2
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...