Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Pablo Nunez Serrano, A041 402 248 (BIA June 20, 2013)

Pablo Nunez Serrano, A041 402 248 (BIA June 20, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) returned the record for further proceedings because the immigration judge did not ask the respondent whether he wanted to secure legal representation, did not require the respondent to plead to the allegations in the Notice to Appear, did not determine whether the respondent was eligible for relief from removal, and did not ask the respondent if he wished to reserve his appeal rights. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) returned the record for further proceedings because the immigration judge did not ask the respondent whether he wanted to secure legal representation, did not require the respondent to plead to the allegations in the Notice to Appear, did not determine whether the respondent was eligible for relief from removal, and did not ask the respondent if he wished to reserve his appeal rights. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Jul 02, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Fernando Guterrezaw Oce o Fernando Guterrez3340 S. Hasted StChcago  60608Name NUNEZ SERRANO PABO
 pn f Ju
Executive Oce r Immgration Review
ard Immigrtn AppealsOce  he lek
5/07 lbu Pk. Su 2000
Fls
C/  1104
HS/CE Oce o Che Counse
POK3400 FM 350 Southvngston

77351A 0402-248Date o thsnotce6/20/2013
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and orer in the above-rerenced case.nclosure
 b h
Sincerely,
D
u
c
Donna Carr Chie Clerk
will 
Cite as: Pablo Nunez Serrano, A041 402 248 (BIA June 20, 2013)
 
NUNEZ SERRANO, PABLOA041-402248
U.. pn f Ju
Executive Oce r mmigration Review
ard Imgratin AppealsOce  the lerk
50lesbrg Pik, St 000Fa C/rch Virginia 2204
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel POK3400 FM 350 SouthPOK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER 3400 FM 350 SOUTHLivingston TX 77351LIVINGSTON, X 77351Name: NUNEZ SERRANO PABOA 04102248Date of this notice:6/20/2013
Encosed is a coy of the oard's decision in the abovererenced case This coy is begrovided o you as a couresy Your aoey or reresetaive has een seed with thisdecision ursuan o
8
FR § 1292.(a). f he atached decision orders ha yo beremoved om he Unied Saes or arms an mmigraion Judges decision ordering ha youe removed any etition r review of he atached decisio mus e ed wh ad receivedby he aroriate cour of aeas wihin
30
days of the date of the decision.Encosure
 b h
Sincerely
D
c
t
Donna arr hief lerk
wlism: Dck
Cite as: Pablo Nunez Serrano, A041 402 248 (BIA June 20, 2013)
 
U.
p f 
Exe�utive Oce r Immiation ReviewDecision of the Board of mmiation Appealsals Church, Virginia
22041
Fe:A04 l 402 248 -Lvingston,

Date:
JUN 2 0 13
I re PABLO NUNEZ SENO a.k.a Pabo uez Seao a.ka Pedro aa ak.aabo Serano Nuez aka Pabo uezSeano ak.a Pabo Nune ak.a abo S. Nunez
REMOVA PROCDNGSAEALON HAF OF RSPONNT: Feando Gutee, squeO BHAF OF HSohn McPhaAssisat Chief CouseTherespondet appeas the decision of the Immiation Judge, dated Mach 4, 2013,odeing hs remova om the United States The Department of Homead Securty is opposedto the appea.Consideig the totalit of the crcumstances peseted n ths cse, we concude that it isappropate to emand te ecod to the Immgration udge  the proceedngs mpotanty,the mmigaton udge did not ask the respodet whethe he wshed to waive the prvege ofega repesetaton, dd not requie the espodet to pead to the aegatos cotaed in teotce to Appear, dd ot deteme whether the respondent was egibe  reief om emova,addid ot ask the espodet if he wshed to eseve his appea ghts.
ee
8 CFR
§
1240(c);
Matter
o/C-B-,
25 &N Dec. 888 (BA 2012).The ack of peadgs om the respondent d te ack of ct ndg and ega assom te mmigaton udge prevet ths Board om addessg the uderyg merts of therespodent's cams that he s ot subject to remova om the Unted Sates Accodngy, weexpress no opio egadg the uimate outcome of these remova poceedigs at he pesenttime
ee Matter
of
,
21 &N Dec 413 (IA 1996) The owg order s eteed.ORDR The ecod s emaded to the mmigraton Cout r the poceedingscosstent with the egong opinio and r the etry of a ew decsion
Cite as: Pablo Nunez Serrano, A041 402 248 (BIA June 20, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->