Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Lear v. NHK Seating of America

Lear v. NHK Seating of America

Ratings: (0)|Views: 129|Likes:
Published by PriorSmart
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-12937-SJM-RSW: Lear Corporation v. NHK Seating of America Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the Hon. Stephen J. Murphy presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8GR for more info.
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-12937-SJM-RSW: Lear Corporation v. NHK Seating of America Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the Hon. Stephen J. Murphy presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8GR for more info.

More info:

Published by: PriorSmart on Jul 05, 2013
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/23/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGANSOUTHERN DIVISIONLEAR CORPORATION,Plaintiff,v.NHK SEATING OF AMERICA, INC.Defendant.Case No. _____________ 
COMPLAINT FOR PATENTINFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND
 
 
 1
I. THE PARTIES
1.
 
Plaintiff Lear Corporation (“Lear”) is a Delaware corporation,
having its principal place of business at 21557 Telegraph Road, Southfield,Michigan 48086.2.
 
Upon information and belief, Defendant NHK Seating of America, Inc.
(“
 NHK 
”) is
a Michigan corporation, having its principal place of  business at 2298 West State Road 28, Frankfort, Indiana 46041.
II. JURISDICTION
 3.
 
Claims pleaded herein arise under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. §1
et seq
.4.
 
Subject matter jurisdiction for the pleaded claims is conferredupon the Court by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338.
III. PATENTS-IN-SUIT
5.
 
On January 3, 1995, U.S. Patent No. 5,378,043
(“the
 
043 patent
”), for “
Vehicle Pivotal Headrest,
” was duly and lawfully issued, naming
David C. Viano, Richard J. Neely and Mladen Humer as inventors. A copy of the
‘043
patent is attached as Exhibit A.6.
 
Plaintiff Lear is the owner by assignment of the
043 patent.
 
 27.
 
Defendant NHK has had knowledge of the ‘043 patent at least
since August 8, 2007.8.
 
On October 14, 2003, U.S. Patent No. 6,631,949
(“the ‘
949
 patent”), for
Variable Movement Headrest Arrangement
,” was duly and lawfully
issued, naming Mladen Humer, Yan Fan and Magnus Roland as inventors. A copy
of the ‘
949 patent is attached as Exhibit B.9.
 
Plaintiff Lear is the owner by assignment of the ‘9
49 patent.10.
 
Defendant NHK has had knowledge of the ‘949 patent at least
since August 8, 2007.11.
 
On October 14, 2003, U.S. Patent No. 6,631,955
(“the ‘
955
 patent”), for
Variable Movement Headrest Arrangement
,” was duly and lawfully
issued, naming Mladen Humer, Yan Fan and Magnus Roland as inventors. A copy
of the ‘
955 patent is attached as Exhibit C.12.
 
Plaintiff Lear is
the owner by assignment of the ‘9
55 patent.13.
 
Defendant NHK has had knowledge of the ‘955 patent at least
since August 8, 2007.14.
 
On December 2, 2003, U.S. Patent No. 6,655,733
(“the ‘
733
 patent”), for
Variable Movement Headrest Arrangement
,” was duly and l
awfullyissued, naming Mladen Humer and Yan Fan
as inventors. A copy of the
733 patent is attached as Exhibit D.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->