Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-
.
.
.
.
)Brown et al.,
.(1987
)
.(Atiase, 1985; Bhushan, 1989
.
.
.1
)Jensen
(&Meckling, 1976
.
. ) (Baiman, 1982
" )(
)( " )
.(P.155 :
)Gomez-
.(Mejia &Wiseman, 2007
.
.
.
) (Beaver, 1998
- :
.
.
.
.
.
.
/
.
.
.
) .(Francis et al., 1996
)Healy
.(&Wahlen, 1999, P.368
) (Schipper, 1989
" " Informational Perspective
) (Pourciau, 1993
" " Opportunistic Earnings
.Management
.
.
).(Healy &Wahlen, 1999
) Graham et
.(al., 2005; Degeorge et al., 1999; Dye, 1988
)Graham et al., 2005; Dechow &shiner,
.(2000; DeFond &Jiambalvo, 1994
:
:Income Smoothing
/ )
.(Fudenberg &Tirole, 1995
.
)Burgstahler
.(&Dichev, 1997
Accelerating Revenue
:Recognition
)Sevin &Schroeder,
.(2005
" " :Big Bath Charges
.
/ )Jordan &Clark, 2004; Walsh et al.,
.(1991
Discretion in
:Accounting Estimates
)
(
)
.(GAAP
Discretion in
:Accounting Method Choices
/
) (
.(GAAP (Heflin et al., 2002
.2
.
Mean
.
.
Event Studies
.
.
(Jones (Jones, 1991
.
:T - )(
. )
(
.
.3 :
.
.
)Gu et al.,
(2005
. ) (Gu et al., 2005
:
) ( . )Gu
(et al., 2005
.
)( : )(Hayn, 1995
.
.
. )(Gu et al., 2005
.
: ) (Gu et al., 2005
. )(Gu et al., 2005
.
: ) (Gu et al., 2005
.
.
) (
. ) (Gu et al., 2005
.
,
)Gu et al.,
(2005 .
:
/ : )
(Amat et al., 1999
/ .
/ .
/
.
:
.
) (Amat et al., 1999
.
.
.
:
.
) (Giroux &Wiggins, 1984
.
.
:
/
.4 :
.
.
T-
.
/
/ .
/ .
) .(Gu et al., 2005
.
"
.
.
.
T
.
Homoscedasticity
T-
.
.
.
. ) (Pourciau, 1993
" "Big bath
.
.
.
) .(Healy, 1985
.
.5
EM .
:
Income Smoothing
.
5-1
.
/ .
.
.
5-1-1
) (Dye, 1988
:
.
) (.
.
.
5-1-2
).(Bartov et al., 2002; Healy &Wahlen, 1999
. ) (Barth et al., 1999
)(PE
) (PE
.
PE
.
) (DeAngelo et al., 1996
%14 .
) (Burgstahler &Dichev, 1997
.
.
)Hayn, 1995; Burgstahler &Dichev,
(1997
.
.
. ) Bartov et
,(al., 2002
.
.
) (Burgstahler &Dichev, 1997
.
. Prospect Theory
.
.
) (Graham et al., 2005
400
.
.
%78
.
.
.
)Graham et al.,
.(2005
5-1-3
)
.(Healy &Wahlen, 1999
.
);Guidry et al., 1999; Healy, 1985
.(Holthausen et al., 1995
)
.(Bartov &Mohanvam, 2004
)Gaver, 2003, p.
.(583 )Bartov
(&Mohanvam, 2004
.
. ,
.
) (DeFond &Jiambalvo, 1994
.
.
5-1-4
)Healy &Wahlen,
.(1999 ) (Watts &Zimmerman, 1978
" "
. Watts
&Zimmerman
. )
(Navissi, 1999
1971 .1972 ) (Jones, 1991
.
) (Cahan et al., 1997
.1980
5-2
.
) (Degeorge et al., 1999
.
(1) :
) ( (2)
(3) )
( .
.
.
.
)
( .
) (Graham et al., 2005
.
.
"
" " " ).(p.5
)Dechow &Shinner,
(2000 "
" ) .(p.248
.
.
.
) (Roychowdury, 2006
.
"
) .(Roychowdury, 2006 )
.
) (Lambert, 1984
.
.
)(Trueman &Titman, 1988
.
.
.
. )
(Trueman &Titman, 1988
.
) (Beattie et al., 1994 163
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) .(Amat et al., 1999
.
.
.
.
.
/
/
.
GAAP
.
5-4-1
.
.
.
:
.
) (Worthy, 1984
.
. 20
) (APB
.
) .(Lee, 2000
FASB
.
.
FASB SEC
.
)
( .
. ) (Healy &Palepu, 1990
.
.
.
.
.
.
.Stuffing the Pipeline
.
.
.
.GAAS GAAS
).(Swanson, 2007
5-4-2 Financial Distress
) :
(1
) (2 (3)
.
) (Altman &Lavalee, 1983
:/
/ /
/
.
.
Marais )Altman
(&Lavalee, 1983
.
Marais /
/1
/
/ . Marais
.
)
(
.
Koch )
(Lee, 2000 Financial Strength Rating
Technical Default
)
( .
.
)(
) (+
.
.
) (
.
) (Giroux &Wiggins, 1984
.
.
.
) (Lau, 1987
:
.
400
. Multinomial Logit
.
%79 %85
.
) (Jones &Hensher, 2004
5-5
:
).(McNichols, 2000
5-5-1
)Dechow
(&Sloan, 1991) (Petroni, 1992) (McNichols, 1998
.
Dechow & Sloan
.
GAAP
.
5-5-2 Distributional
Analysis
) (Burgstahler &Dichev, 1997
Cross-Sectional Distributional
.Method
.
.
.
.
:
Bins
.
.
.
5-5-3
:
(Healy (Healy, 1985 DeAngelo (DeAngelo,
(1986 (Jones (Jones, 1991 Jones )
.(Dechow, Sloan &Sweeney, 1995
.
(Healy (Healy, 1985
. Healy
:
,
. Healy
.
Estimation Period
Event
.Period
)Dechow et al.,
.(1995 (DeAngelo (DeAngelo, 1986
.Healy DeAngelo
)
.(Dechow et al., 1995
Healy DeAngelo
Jones
.((Jones, 1991 Jones
.
.
.
%25
Jones (Jones,
.(1991 Jones )(Dechow et al., 1995
Jones
.
).(Dechow et al., 1995
) (Healy &Wahlen, 1999
/ . )
(Healy, 1985
)
( .
Healy ) (
.
. :Healy
= / 1
:
:
.
:
.
:1
.
. )
(Healy, 1985
) ( ) (
.
) (DeAngelo, 1986
) (
. )(DeAngelo, 1986
) ( )
( ) (.
DeAngelo Healy
) (
. DeAngelo
) (
) (
1- ) ( .
DeAngelo :
= ) /(1- 1-
:
:
.
:
.
:1-
.
DeAngelo Healy
.
) ( .
DeAngelo
.
Healy DeAngelo
)
(
) (
) (1- ) (
).(Dechow et al., 1995
) (Jones, 1991
Healy DeAngelo
) ( . Jones
. Jones
.
Jones :
/ = 1- )/1 + (1- )1
/ (1-
+ )2 / + (1-
:
:
.
:1-
.
: 1-
.
:
.
.
Jones
.
) .(1997
Jones )(Dechow et al., 1995
.EM Jones )(MJM
:
= / [ -1 - /1)1 + (1-
))1
(/ + (1- )2 / (1-]
:
:
.
:
.
:1 - .
: 1-
.
:
1- .
:
.
Jones
.
.
)Healy, 1985; Jones, 1991; Dechow et al.,
:(1995
= ) - - + - (/ 1-
:
: .
: .
: .
:
.
:
: .
5-6
) (
) (
) (Chou et al., 2006; Lee, 2006; Mir &Seboui, 2006
) (
. )Chou
(et al., 2006
.
. ) (Visvanathan, 2006
) (
) (
.
/
) ( .
) (
.
. );Healy, 1985
(Jones, 1991; Dechow et al., 1995
) (
/
.
) ( .
.
) (CFO
.
)
( )
( .
.
) (WC
) (CFO .
.
) (
.
.
) (WC
) (CFO
.
. ) (Miller, 2007
) (
.
.
)
(
.
.
.
.
.
) (Miller, 2007
.
.
.
.
.
5-6-1
.
.
.
) (Jones, 1991 ) ( )
( . )Dechow et al.,
(1995 Jones )
( . )(Albornoz &Alcarria, 2003
Jones . )& Tucker
(Zarowin, 2006 ) ( ) ROA
( .
) (Dechow &Dichev, 2002
.
)
. Jones
. )Aren,
(2007 Jones.
) (Han & Wang, 1998 Jones
.
) (Magnan et al., 1999 Jones
.
.
) (Xie et al., 2003
. )
(Das &Zhang, 2003
. )Albornoz
(&Illuecca, 2004
.
/
.
/.
) (CFO
) (WC
. Miller Ratio
((MR .CFO/WC :
Jones
);Mitra, 2007
.(Lobo &Zhou, 2006; Kwon &Yin, 2006 )
(Miller, 2007 MR
)
(WC )
.(CFO
.
) (.
)( WC .CFO )Cheng
(&Thomas, 2006 Jones
/
.
.
.
) (Miller, 2007
Jones
.
.
.
.
.5 :
5-1 :
) :
(2006
) .(2 50
2005 2004 2003
150 .
) (1
.
%20 %18
%10 .
%8
%6
%4 .
)
( %2 .
.
Microsoft Excel 2007 SPSS
.16
) :(1
10
5
1
2
9
2
2
1
4
1
1
2
1
5
1
50
20%
10%
6%
2%
4%
18%
4%
4%
2%
8%
2%
2%
4%
2%
10%
2%
100%
5-2 :
.
.
MR
)
( . ) (1
.
) :(1
-
) Gu et
.(al., 2005 )Gu
) :(3
.
) :(3
.
-4 ) Growth( : ) Gu et
(al., 2005
.
) (.
:
) :(4
.
) :(4
.
-5 )( : ) Gu et
(al., 2005
.
) ( .
1 .
:
) :(5
.
) :(5
.
-6 )( : ) Gu et
(al., 2005
.
) ( .
:
) :(6
.
) :(6
.
-7 )( : )Gu et al.,
(2005
.
.
) (1
)( .
:
) :(7
.
) :(7
.
-8 / )( :
) (Amat et al., 1999
/ .
/ .
/ .
/
:
) :(8
/
.
) :(8
/
.
-9 )(:
. )
(Amat et al., 1999
.
.
. )
(1 )( .
:
) :(9
.
) :(9
.
-10 )( :
. )& Giroux
(Wiggins, 1984
.
.
) (1
)(
.
:
) :(10
.
) :(10
.
) :(2
) (2
= /
= +
.
= ) - ( / .
= 1
.
= 1
.
= 1
.
= 1
.
. = 31/12
= 1
.
) (
.
/
/
) 1(.
.
) ( .
50
.2005 2004 2003 )(8
.
5-2-1 :
) (3) (4
.
Skewness
Kurtosis
.
Standard
Deviation );Dechow et al., 1995
;Mitra, 2007; Wright et al., 2006; Lobo & Zhou, 2006
.(Kwon & Yin, 2006
2005 :(3)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
.82
5.1056
.04
1.00
.65
.04
.1880
671.407
.5445
5.0303
-.2823 Mean
.055
.63109
.028
.000
.068
.028
.04285
144.871
.03283
1.1916
1.00
3.4483
.00
1.00
1.00
.00
.1025
238.481
.5413
1.2085
9.72
.00(a)
3.94(a)
.388
4.46245
.198
.000
.479
.198
.30300
1024.39
.23214
8.4261
.151
19.913
.039
.000
.229
.039
.092 1049384.3
.054
71.000
3.530 Variance
-1.718
1.753
4.841
-.697
4.841
3.873
1.984
-.001
2.633
1.124 Skewness
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.989
3.246
22.331
-1.580
22.33
18.735
2.707
-.696
6.899
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
20.93
1.85
3517.22
.88
38.194
.50
.00
3.94
.07
.080
-3.54 Minimum
21.43
1.85
3521.16
.95
38.274
6.82 Maximum
41
255.28
50
33
9.40
33570.3
27.22
251.51
.337
.07(a) .080(a)
50 Valid N
.0552 Median
-3.54(a) Mode
1.8789 Std. Deviation
14.12 Sum
2004 :(4)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
.94
2.4628
.18
.94
.66
.06
.1279
803.3640
.5571
3.9637
.034
.51117
.055
.034
.068
.034
.02199 176.26287
.03266
.87400
1.00
1.6182
.00
1.00
1.00
.00
.0805
245.9598
.5495
.98750
.00(a)
.00(a)
18.55(a)
.240
3.61454
.388
.240
.479
.240
.15551 1246.3667
.23093
6.1801
.058
13.065
.151
.058
.229
.058
.024 1553429.9
.053
38.194
4.088 Variance
-3.821
4.316
1.718
-3.821
-.697
3.821
2.234
1.872
.092
2.384
.221 Skewness
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
.337
13.124
21.001
.989
13.124
-1.580
13.124
5.598
2.385
-1.060
5.726
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
.662
22.34
.74
4752.22
.79
27.910
.00
.00
18.55
.14
.067
-6.88 Minimum
22.34
.75
4770.77
.93
27.977
6.96 Maximum
47
123.14
47
33
6.39
40168.20
27.85
198.18
.14(a) .067(a)
50 Valid N
.2472 Mean
.28593 Std. Error of Mean
.0726 Median
-6.88(a) Mode
2.02186 Std. Deviation
-12.36 Sum
Skewness Kurtosis
.
) (
.
Kurtosis
Kurtosis
.
Skewness Kurtosis 3 5
Standard
errors
.
Kurtosis 4,853
2,885 2004 2005 5
1,42965 1,3286
) 5 28593,0 .(0,26572
Kurtosis .
Skewness 0,221
1,124 2004 2005 5
1,42965 1,3286
) 5 028593 (0,26572
.
Parametric
.Tests
.
5-2-2 :
) (3) (4
. ) (5
.
:5
3,96376 5,03034
0,2472 0,2823- 2004 2005
.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
.
7
.
0,1279 0,1880 2004
2005
.
0,18 0,04 2004 2005
.
/ 2,4628
0,1056 2004 2005
/
.
3
.
5-4 :
) (2
.
.
%90 .
) (6 .
) :(6
Model
.
241
Adjusted
R
R Square Square
.058
-.047
Std.
Error of
the
Estimate
Change Statistics
R
Square
Change
2.00597
ANOVA
.058
Sig. F
F
Change df2 df1 Change
.551
10
89
.849
Mean
F
Square
df
Sum of Squares
Change
Statistics
Adjusted
R
R
.551
2.218
10
22.179
R
Square
Square
89
358.127
Sig. F
F
R4.024
Square
99
380.306
Change Change Change
Sig.
.849
Model
Regression
Residual
Total
.683
.705
.537
.423
.312
.606
.257
.252
.493
.400
.467
.497
.288
.179
.098
.367
.066
.063
.243
.160
.467
.497
.288
.179
.098
.367
.066
.063
.243
.160
.414
.447
.217
.097
.007
.304
-.027
-.030
.168
.076
.000
.000
.000
.031
.384
.000
.702
.729
.002
.060
8.759
9.886
4.051
2.178
1.082
5.808
.706
.676
3.217
1.909
Coefficients
Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
)(Constant
Standardized
Coefficients
-.686
-.008
.265
3.83E-005
-.847
.927
.173
-.046
.101
.038
Std. Error
1.590
.037
1.234
.000
.921
.969
.532
1.217
.662
.055
-.031
.031
.022
-.104
.104
.042
-.004
.016
.083
.685
.674
.114
Sig.
Beta
-.432
-.218
-.215
-.182
.919
-.956
.325
-.038
.152
.700
1.01
7
.667
.828
.830
.856
.360
.341
.746
.970
.880
.486
.312
.
F 0,551
.
) :(7
. R-Square
0,160 0,497 Adjusted R-Square
0,007 0,447 ) .(7
Adjusted R-Squre
0,047 ) (6
) (.
.
) (8
.
) (8
0,512 .
) :(8
.6:
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
Pearson Correla
Sig. (2-tailed
1
-.113
.264
.090
.372
.087
.388
-.145
.150
.110
.274
.087
.388
-.012
.902
.007
.947
.088
.382
.110
.274
1
)**(.512
.000
)**(.259
.009
-.145
.151
-.121
.231
)**(-.488
.000
.063
.534
-.079
.437
.037
.716
)**(-.339
.001
1
)**(.398
.000
)**(-.327
.001
-.003
.978
)**(-.339
.001
.013
.900
-.108
.285
)**(.262
.008
-.055
.585
1
-.180
.073
.021
.837
)**(-.433
.000
.070
.492
.020
.847
-.064
.528
-.002
.981
1
-.130
.197
.089
.379
-.005
.964
-.122
.227
.119
.238
-.028
.785
1
.165
.102
.040
.690
.066
.514
-.170
.090
.085
.402
1
-.126
.211
.050
.622
.028
.786
.125
.216
1
.062
.541
.144
.154
-.065
.521
1
-.171
.089
.031
.756
.
.
.
)) (5) (3) (2) (1
(10) (7) (6 .
/
) .(9) (8) (4
1
-.125
.214
.
.
.
.
.
.
)" (1996
:
"
.82 -59 (3) 21
:
2006 .
Albornoz, B. G., & Alcarria, J.J. (2003), "Analysis and Diagnosis of
Income Smoothing in Spain", European Accounting Review,
12 (3), 443-463.
Albornoz, B. G., & Illueca, M. (2004), "Comparing Abnormal
Accruals Models: A Nonparametric Approach", Applied
Economics, 36 (13), 1455-1460.
Altamuro, J., Beatty, A., & Weber, J. (2005), "The Effects of
Accelerated
Revenue
Recognition
on
Earnings
Informativeness: Evidence from SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101", The Accounting Review, 80(2), 373-401.
Altman, E., & Lavalee, M. (1983). Business Failure Classification in
Canada. Journal of Business Administration, 147-164.
Amat, O., Blake, J, & Dowds, J (1999), The Ethics of Creative
Accounting (paper no. 349), Department of Economics and
Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.