Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rinsing
Technical reasons for rinsing Rinse water quality Rinsing methods Possibilities for water savings
Danced
Technical reasons for rinsing Stop chemical reactions on the surface To remove contaminants from the surface To minimise or eliminate drag-in of chemicals and contaminants To avoid salt coatings/spots on the finished items
Danced
Rinse water quality Depends on the purpose of rinsing Depends on the rinsing system
Danced
Purpose of the rinsing The process before rinsing (etching, degreasing, aggressive chemicals?) The process after rinsing (are the process chemicals in family with the drag-in chemicals/contaminants?) Is it the final rinse, and what contaminants can be left on the surface?
Danced
The rinsing system Single static rinse Single running rinse Drag-out tank + single running rinse Drag-out tank + double counter flow rinses Drag-out tank + triple or more in counter flow Rinses in reverse flow to process Spray rinse over tank Spray rinse to WWTP Combinations of the above
Danced
Dilution factors Rinsing After degreasing and pickling Before electroplating baths After miscellaneous chemical baths Final rinse after decorative chromium Final rinse after other electroplating baths Typical Dilution factor 100-1,000 500-2,000 200-2,000 5,000-10,000 1,000-5,000
Danced
Rinsing methods Immersion rinsing is used in most cases is necessary for items having a complex geometry Spray rinsing can be used for simple geometry or might be tailored for a uniform production
Danced
Danced
Dragout = 1 litre/h
200g/l
10,000 litres /h
200g/l
100 litres /h
200g/l
21 litres /h
Danced
Pure Water
Danced
E = Electro-degreaser
Danced
1 Drag-out
B
Institute for Product Development
Danced
*) The water consumption equals the dilution of the chemically treated rinse water with 10% (by volume) fresh water.
Institute for Product Development
AHJ Rinsing RSA - 2000
Danced
Drag-out volumes Suspension and dripping Vertically suspended items, effective dripping Vertically suspended items, poor dripping Horizontally suspended items, effective dripping Horizontally suspended items, poor dripping Cup-shaped items, poor dripping Barrels, poor dripping Drag-out volume, ml/m2 25-50 160 50-100 200-400 300-1000 300-500
Barrels, effective dripping, 150-250 rotation Typical, overall average drag out 100-150
Institute for Product Development
AHJ Rinsing RSA - 2000
Danced
Drag out minimisation Prolongation of dripping time Rotation of barrels above the tank Shaking and tilting of racks above the tank Thinner process solutions Scraping of sheet shaped items (like PCBs) Air knives, blowing off the majority of the solution First coarse spray rinse - or spray mist - over the tank
Danced
K
IPU-production Ver. 2.21
L
27-07-00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
200,0 1,0 1
[liter]
Date:
10-10-00 13:15
Result:
Concentrations
[g/liter] The values in the table are calculated for a reverse flow of
0,040
0,040 0,000
5000
[liter]
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8
Danced
1000 100 10 1 0,1 Co nc. 0,01 in tan 0,001 k# [g/l0,0001 iter ] 1E-05 1E-06 1E-07 1E-08 1E-09 1E-10 1E-11 1E-12 1E-13 Reverse Flow [liter] 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000