: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

Flood Management in
Namhak,
Khiriratnikhom, Suratthani

Darakorn Plongkong

; Email: Plongkong_12@hotmail.com

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[45]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

/

: ,

Abstract
The purpose of this research was to
study the flood situations in Namhak,
Khiriratnikhom,
Suratthani
and
the
Namhak
communitys
4-step
flood
handling
process,
alarming,
aiding
residents,
draining,
and
ameliorating/restoring. The research was a
qualitative research study by using the
[46]

: 2

1 ( . .- . . 2556)
focus group discussion technique with the
sample of 8 entities, the community
leaders, the local leaders and the wise
people. Statistical classification was used
and then synthesised as a descriptive
summary. The research findings were
summarised as follows: Alarming must
start from both the senders and receivers
in the communication. When an immediate
flood occurred, alarming was prone to
failure and thus people could not get a
timely news. So, both Namhak Subdistrict
Administrative
Organisation
and
the
community leaders must function together
to alert people quickly throughout and
thoroughly up-to-date. In risk analysis of
each areas, some communities were still
lack of knowledge, clear information and
statistics to assess the severity of the
flooding. As for aiding residents, it was
found that the agencies that could help
people coping with the flood were the
district, the province, the Office of Disaster
Prevention and Mitigation, and the
Provincial Administration since these
agencies were readily available and
adequately capable to support the affected
areas. The leading factor in the process of
[47]

: 2

1 ( . .- . . 2556)
operation to consider was survival bags.
Drainage in Namhak was lack of the proper
management, mostly fixing only problems
at hands. Ameliorating/Restoring was the
process of reconstructing the areas and
returning normal living conditions to
people.
Keyword: Flood Management, Namhak

500

[48]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

..2553

..2543
20
16

3
80
[49]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

30,000 10,000


..2553



23 ..2554

10 100 651
628,998 2,094,595
64 (
, 2554)



[50]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

77.11
11

[51]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

1.

2.

[52]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

1.




4
/
2.

[53]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

Focus Group Discussion

Focus Group Discussion 4

/

(Descriptive Analysis)

(2555)
[54]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

9
[55]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

11

1-2

[56]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

(Land slide)

[57]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

1 3 4
5

6, 8, 9, 11

[58]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[59]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

.





[60]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

5 1
3 5 6
9

(.)


[61]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[62]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[63]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[64]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[65]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[66]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[67]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[68]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[69]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

/
/

[70]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

4


/

[71]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[72]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

1 3
4 5

2-3

[73]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

4
[74]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

[75]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

1 3

4 5

2-3

[76]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

1.

[77]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

Early Warning



2.






3.

4.

[78]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

5.

6.






[79]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

7.

()

8.

[80]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

9.

. 2555. ( )

. 1
(1):
1.

. 2554.
[81]

: 2

( . .- . .

2556)

:
.
: .
4 .
2554.
. 13
2555

region4.prd.
go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=62.
. 2554.


( )
. 13
2555 www.samutprakanpao.
com/?p=172.

[82]