Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jesus Ivan Ruiz-Estrada, A095 129 850 (BIA July 11, 2013)

Jesus Ivan Ruiz-Estrada, A095 129 850 (BIA July 11, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 520|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacated the order of removal and remanded the case for further consideration of whether conviction for money laundering under Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-2317(B)(1) is a crime involving moral turpitude. The decision was written by Member Anne Greer and joined by Member Patricia Cole and Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacated the order of removal and remanded the case for further consideration of whether conviction for money laundering under Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-2317(B)(1) is a crime involving moral turpitude. The decision was written by Member Anne Greer and joined by Member Patricia Cole and Member Roger Pauley.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Jul 15, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

10/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
Larios, Hugo
F
., EsqHugo
F
Laios aw, PLLC3110 SRural Road, Ste101 Tempe,
85282
US Deprtment f tie
Executive Oce  Immigration Review
Board ofImmigration Appealsce of the Clek
5 /7 lebrg Pike, Si Fas Cd Vinia 
OHS/CE ice of Chief Counse -TUSP Box 25158Phoenix,
85002Nae: RUIZESTRADA, JESUS IVANA 095-129-850Date of this notice 7/11/2013 
csed s a cpy f he Boad's decso ad de  he above-eeeced case.csue
P Mb:C  AG A Jy Rg 
Sceely,
D
c
t
Doa Ca Chef Cek
uca k
Cite as: Jesus Ivan Ruiz-Estrada, A095 129 850 (BIA July 11, 2013)
 
1,'
U.S
eptent f tie
Decso of te Bord o mmtio AppelsExecutive Oce r Immigraton RevewFll Chch, Vga
0
Fe:A095 29 850 Tucson,
In reJESUS IVA RUIZ-ETDA REOVAL PROCEEGSAPPEADae:O BEALF OF RESPONDENT: Hugo F Laos, EsqureO BEHAF OF DSCAGMahew W KaufmanSeor Aoe
JUL 1 !203
 Noce Sec23(a)(2)(A)(), &N Ac 8 USC
§
122(a)(2)(A)()] Convced of crme nvolvg moral rpudeAPPCATO: TenaonThe responde a nave ad czen o Meco appeals om an Immgaon udge'sOcober 11, 2011 decso ndg ha hs Augus 2009 covcon r mone lauderng under secon
l
3237(B)() o he Azoa code s a crme volv mora urpude, ad reders hmremovabe under he abovecapoed chage snce he commed  whn 5 ears of hsadmsso o he Ued Saes Te record wl be remanded r her proceedngs conssenwih hs orderWe revew an Igraon udges cual deenaons, ncudg credbdeernaons, r cear eor
See
8 CFR
1003 (d)(3)() Te Board uses a de ovosandad o revew r quesons o aw dscreo, judgme ad al oher ssues  appeas omdecsons ofmmgrao Judges
See
8 CFR
§
10031 (d)(3)()Pursuano he record o covco, nclud he pea ageemen, mue order and heranscrp o e respondens pea (Eh 1) he Imgraon udge und ha he respondesconvcon arses uder secon 3-23
(B)() ohe Arzona saues (J a 8) As o hsdscr ca rao   o car or sc  a greem" a asgedAugus
4,
2009 b boh pares ndcas ha he respode was chaged uder aended cou oe" o voag er aa, scos 13-1001 3-231?(B)(1) ad (E) of heArzoa Revsed aues
See
Eh 11
1
We noe ha ( ) seco 13-100 o he Azoa Revsed Saues reaes o aemp(2) seco 3-23  (E) o he Arzoa Rvsed Saues caeorzs he rspoes covcoCoued)
Cite as: Jesus Ivan Ruiz-Estrada, A095 129 850 (BIA July 11, 2013)
 
A095 129 850
Setion
3-2317()(1)
of the Aiona Revised Sttes provides that a person is guilty of money laundering in the seond degree if the person does any of the lowing: [aquires or mantans an interest in ansats, transrs anspots reeives or oneas the existene or nare of raketeering proeeds knoing or having reason to kno that they ae the proeeds of an oense"
See
Ari Rev Stat
§ 3237()( )
Ameded ount one traks the statutoy anguage, exept that it adds aer te wordoense" a phrase speiing that he oense at issue in the respondents ase was o wit Saleof Coaine"
See
Exh
1
(Plea Aeement) The respondent ped guilty to his harge asreeted in the August
4 2009
transript of the Change of Pea"
See
Exh
1.
his transriptalso reets the respodents admissions to the underying ts as reeted in the statesevidene" ie that the respondent was obseed at his plae of eployment thowing items over a fene, was en und to have ore than ten pakets of oaine i his poket, and thenadied that he was aemptig to se the oaie
See
Exh
11
(Change of Plea at
0).
herespondent also admitted atempting to se ertain items om the salvage business r whih hewas working
Id
at
11
The miation Judge und hat the statutory setion under whih the respondentwasonvited did not present a ategorial rime of mora turpitude due to the t that the sienter"requirement is written in the disuntive, ie knows or has reason to know"
See
IJ at
 78
oever, due to the respondents tua admissios, as reeted in the plea transript, eImmiation Judge ud that the respondent
"clearly kew
that his ondut demosated hewasaquiring or maintainng an interest in trasatio [si trasfering, ransporting, reeiving,or onealing the existene of the nature of raketeering proeeds, knoig hat they were theproeeds of an oense, to wit, sale of oaine"
See
J at
8
(emphasis added) he migrationJudge und that this indiated hat the respondent was onvited of money aundering, knowingthat the oense o whih the proeeds were derived was the sale of oaine J at
 9
While we nd o ause to disurb the Immigration Judges analysis of te reord of onvition r the purpose of deteining hether e respondents onvition invoved herequisite evel of siente," as disussed by the Atoey Genera i
Matter of SlvaTrevino, 2
&N
De
687
(AG
 2008),
we nd that ther proeedings are neessary to lari te basison whih he Imigration Judge deteined that the Ariona staute at issue reahes the type of reprehensible ondut neessary r a nding that an oense invoved ora tupitudeasa ass
3
ony, and
(3)
other setios of the Ariona ode were rerened in the amededout oe but hese are not at issue i t aeal
2
Te mmigration Judge idiated tat he reord of onvitio, iluding the iitialinditent,aswe as he plea agreeent, and the minute ey, and aly the ange of plearansipt"was oered into evidee by the Department of Homeand Seuriy and is Exhibit
11
(alhoug the douments are not mared)
 2
Cite as: Jesus Ivan Ruiz-Estrada, A095 129 850 (BIA July 11, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->